C Connor Bedard - Regina Pats, WHL (2023 Draft) Part 3

FiveFourteenSixOne

5-14-6-1
Sponsor
Jan 28, 2006
4,077
1,641
Edmonton
Probably the wrong time to say it but Matthews was clearly a better prospect imo. I would prefer Eichel too. Guess I’m not nearly as high on Bedard as some (most?) are here.

Hey guys I found the contrarian!

This is the kind of person that was born and raised in Montreal and cheers for the Leafs, "just cuz".
 

FDBluth

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
11,265
1,264
Kelowna, BC
Anyone get a bit of a Datsyuk vibe from Bedard?
I can see it. I think he has a similar approach in certain aspects of his game, especially when beating players and moving with the puck in the offensive zone. Very methodical and surgical in executing moves with the puck. Likes to go east-west and beat players going from side to side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexanderTheGood

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,730
34,977
**or compliments
The discourse here has rather obviously been comparing Bedard and Matthews as prospects and in terms of NHL projection, with size being a major factor

Someone uses Cole Caufield as an example that Bedard will be able to "absolutely rip it" in NHL despite his size. This makes very little sense to me, because

Caufield is a 20 goal scorer, not a 60 goal scorer like Matthews
So, either
a) Caufield is massively inferior to Matthews in shooting ability
or,
b) Caufields size or other abilities prevent him from getting to the scoring positions required to score like Matthews

Which leaves us with absolutely no evidence through Caufield example that size is not a concern in terms of being "absolutely able to rip it" at the NHL level, so long as Matthews or any other relevant goalscorer really is the standard being compared to.
Caufield scored something like 20 goals in his final 37 games of the season. As a rookie on a lottery team.

I think it's safe to assume that he's going to be a really good goal scorer.
 

Kopitar11

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
75
53
Sweden
He is such a beast. Whatever team gets him will be very happy in the future.
Hope he doesnt end up in a place like arizona for example.
Philly would be a dream for the fans and im one.
But it sucks to tank, but we'll see. We might not even have to do it we can go very very bad anyway and get a goood chance in lottery. Its time for the NHL to give the Flyers the first choice.
Tired of the same teams getting it everytime. Its not fair
 

McRpro

Cont. without supporting.
Aug 18, 2006
10,139
7,356
He is such a beast. Whatever team gets him will be very happy in the future.
Hope he doesnt end up in a place like arizona for example.
Philly would be a dream for the fans and im one.
But it sucks to tank, but we'll see. We might not even have to do it we can go very very bad anyway and get a goood chance in lottery. Its time for the NHL to give the Flyers the first choice.
Tired of the same teams getting it everytime. Its not fair
Sometimes life isn't fair, Rocket Man.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
37,610
60,631
Weegartown
Has to be said he was brutal in the QF game against the Swiss. All the immature things you would expect from a freshly 17 year old budding superstar. Long shifts, getting lost in the defensive zone, trying to go 1 on 2 too often, firing it into defenders rather than making a pass. Also god bless him for the effort shot blocking but ooooof :laugh: complete flailure

Will be interesting to see how his game rebounds in the SF. Elite players don't have b2b bad games very often.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ippenator

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,278
795
Toronto, ON.
HF is so exhausting sometimes. You do acknowledge that Caufield can fire the puck-right? That he can beat goalies outright with his shot?
To be honest I think Caufield has a better shot than Bedard, release wise. Bedard can absolutely wire the puck, but he has to really lean into it. I wouldn’t describe Bedard as having an insanely good release, but it does pop off his stick really well. He gets a bit too many of his shots blocked or deflected as he does need some time and space to let it go. Caufield has a bit more of a versatile release. I know this won’t be popular since the hype around Bedard is out of this world, but I think him and Caufield will have similar careers. Bedard is better but I don’t think it’s a huge gap. Caufield was also a phenom at the NTDP and just got overshadowed a bit by Hughes when it came to overall hype. I don’t think Bedard is an elite passer or playmaker, skating is fine but not dynamic, isn’t a very good 200 foot player, although I’m sure he’ll improve upon that. But outside of his wicked shot, I don’t see much to his game that scream sure fire top 5 NHL player. Although I do expect him to be a routine 40 goal scorer or more year in year out once he’s established in the league

Yeah but you do realize that if Bedard becomes Cole Caufield that's the biggest bust relative to draft hype since Daigle?
That’s the problem with hype, it often gets out of control and only hurts the kid.
 

Tutu to

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
1,503
881
Toronto
Yeah he’s definitely filled out a little and has gotten heavier, which I do think is essential for a player of his size. Now he just has to keep working on his stride and quick feet.
But was it just me or was he quicker in December? Maybe he’s injured.
 

Chiarelli

Registered User
Jan 27, 2019
5,051
7,079
Nope. Not a bit. A very different kind of player in my opinion. What really makes you think like that?
Shifty, high IQ, positioning, east-west play, and he doesn’t really have a stand out quality other than his shot yet consistently dominant.
 

Ippenator

Registered User
Jan 6, 2016
5,674
4,445
Espoo
Shifty, high IQ, positioning, east-west play, and he doesn’t really have a stand out quality other than his shot yet consistently dominant.
I would say quite far fetched. Datsuyk was defensively excellent, which Bedard definitely isn’t. Datsyuk had absolutely filthy hands, which again Bedard doesn’t have, although his hands are definitely very good for sure. And finally, Datsyuyk was always a pass first guy, while Bedard is definitely a shoot first guy, which he definitely should be with the magnificent shot that he has.

All this leaves me to recognise only the high hockey IQ and shiftiness being a bit similar between them, but I would say those are anyway abilities that all real top class players of their sizes have always had. Really very far fetched to say that they somehow clearly remind each others. I will stick to my opinion that they are after all very different kind or players.
 
Last edited:

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,559
6,754
To be honest I think Caufield has a better shot than Bedard, release wise. Bedard can absolutely wire the puck, but he has to really lean into it. I wouldn’t describe Bedard as having an insanely good release, but it does pop off his stick really well. He gets a bit too many of his shots blocked or deflected as he does need some time and space to let it go. Caufield has a bit more of a versatile release. I know this won’t be popular since the hype around Bedard is out of this world, but I think him and Caufield will have similar careers. Bedard is better but I don’t think it’s a huge gap. Caufield was also a phenom at the NTDP and just got overshadowed a bit by Hughes when it came to overall hype. I don’t think Bedard is an elite passer or playmaker, skating is fine but not dynamic, isn’t a very good 200 foot player, although I’m sure he’ll improve upon that. But outside of his wicked shot, I don’t see much to his game that scream sure fire top 5 NHL player. Although I do expect him to be a routine 40 goal scorer or more year in year out once he’s established in the league


That’s the problem with hype, it often gets out of control and only hurts the kid.
Caufield and even Matthews are on the continuum of classic shots. Matthews uses it better than anyone but it’s still an extreme form of a classic release. First time I say Bedard I was stunned how his shot was different.

He presses hard downwards, the stick bends in a deep arc and loads up energy and the puck just pops out. The follow through snaps upward differently than anyone else. The way the puck leaves the blade must be confusing for goalies. And it comes in like a bullet.
 

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,278
795
Toronto, ON.
Caufield and even Matthews are on the continuum of classic shots. Matthews uses it better than anyone but it’s still an extreme form of a classic release. First time I say Bedard I was stunned how his shot was different.

He presses hard downwards, the stick bends in a deep arc and loads up energy and the puck just pops out. The follow through snaps upward differently than anyone else. The way the puck leaves the blade must be confusing for goalies. And it comes in like a bullet.
Ya that’s a good description of his release for sure, the way he leans on his stick and let’s the flex of the stick do the work is amazing, it does come off his blade like a bullet. For a smaller guy he can really rip it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad