C Connor Bedard - Regina Pats, WHL (2023 Draft) Part 3

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
25,061
11,845
Same age as Bedard he scored 44 goals in 40 games in the USDP program, and scored 72 goals in 64 games his draft year…

My bad I screwed up the backwards age line on elite prospects but I'm sure Bedard would also have much better stats playing with guys like Hughes and Zegras against lesser competition as well.
 

Bankerguy

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
3,983
2,207
does not look like Jack Hughes out there.
I dont mind the Stamkos comparison (in terms of style)
If you think back to when Stamkos was 22, (his 97 point season), he's kind of resembles him but not as explosive yet more agile and tricky with the puck.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,751
16,933
My bad I screwed up the backwards age line on elite prospects but I'm sure Bedard would also have much better stats playing with guys like Hughes and Zegras against lesser competition as well.
Not so sure that NCAA is lesser competition.
 

Silkytentacles

Registered User
Mar 9, 2021
178
94
Oregon
Bedard will be a lot better than Hughes. Not a good comparison.
Lol a lot better? No, I don’t think you realize how good Jack Hughes is and still yet to become

He didn’t look to explosive with his skating but when he did have the puck he was good with it. Everything about his shot was great just wish he got to better high danger areas in 3 on 3 instead of trying to beat the goalie with some distance on both of those. Can’t wait to see him do more in December
 

Deep Blue Metallic

Bo knows hockey.
Mar 5, 2021
5,201
6,517
Lol a lot better? No, I don’t think you realize how good Jack Hughes is and still yet to become

He didn’t look to explosive with his skating but when he did have the puck he was good with it. Everything about his shot was great just wish he got to better high danger areas in 3 on 3 instead of trying to beat the goalie with some distance on both of those. Can’t wait to see him do more in December
I think Jack was hampered by the unwritten rule that 1OA picks must immediately play in the NHL. Iirc he was the 1st NTDP player to go straight to the NHL. A year of NCAA play would have been enormously beneficial. Regardless, he's on the verge of superstardom now.

Cameron's (mis)use of Bedard was ridiculous. Bumper in the PP and mostly bottom-6 minutes for arguably the best prospect since Matthews is criminal, even for a 17 year-old.

Looking forward to seeing Bedard in December too, with a coach who utilizes him properly. It's pretty much a given he'll destroy the WHL. That shot and release is just absurdly good.
 

GM Armchair

Registered User
Dec 16, 2019
863
1,256
Lol a lot better? No, I don’t think you realize how good Jack Hughes is and still yet to become

He didn’t look to explosive with his skating but when he did have the puck he was good with it. Everything about his shot was great just wish he got to better high danger areas in 3 on 3 instead of trying to beat the goalie with some distance on both of those. Can’t wait to see him do more in December
Yes I think a lot better, but I’m also a believer that Hughes is over hyped. You can believe that he will be close to Bedards skill level but I believe it won’t be close.
 

Silkytentacles

Registered User
Mar 9, 2021
178
94
Oregon
Yes I think a lot better, but I’m also a believer that Hughes is over hyped. You can believe that he will be close to Bedards skill level but I believe it won’t be close.
Hughes has better hands and skating I don’t think he will be a lot better. They will both be top end stars in this league
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I am Bettman

Ippenator

Registered User
Jan 6, 2016
5,674
4,445
Espoo
Yeah technically that was but realistically this WJC was played 8 months later than it had to...
It was still the same to all the players in this tournament, so I don’t think it makes anything necessarily easier for them, as the competition is also a few months older.
 

Future

Registered User
Feb 8, 2011
10,743
3,627
Ontario
Best prospect since Matthews/McDavid but I don’t think he’s on that level. Next tier below IMO because I don’t think his tools compare well. Tools matter a lot at the highest level. What can you do at a level that no one else can? Look at Mackinnon and Makar and their skating, for example.

His best quality is his shot, but I’m not so sure it would even be top 5 in the NHL.
 

silkyjohnson50

Registered User
Jan 10, 2007
11,304
1,195
Best prospect since Matthews/McDavid but I don’t think he’s on that level. Next tier below IMO because I don’t think his tools compare well. Tools matter a lot at the highest level. What can you do at a level that no one else can? Look at Mackinnon and Makar and their skating, for example.

His best quality is his shot, but I’m not so sure it would even be top 5 in the NHL.
Matthews/McDavid isn’t a level either.
 

Future

Registered User
Feb 8, 2011
10,743
3,627
Ontario
Matthews/McDavid isn’t a level either.

Hart/Lindsay/Richard/Art Ross trophy winner isn’t considered a level while discussing individual players’ potential? Especially in the context of how Bedard compares to recent first overall picks?

Does everything have to be a dick measuring contest?
 
Last edited:

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,558
6,749
Best prospect since Matthews/McDavid but I don’t think he’s on that level. Next tier below IMO because I don’t think his tools compare well. Tools matter a lot at the highest level. What can you do at a level that no one else can? Look at Mackinnon and Makar and their skating, for example.

His best quality is his shot, but I’m not so sure it would even be top 5 in the NHL.
Bedard’s elite asset is his shot. The rest of his tools are excellent, but I’d still take Matthews, McDavid and Makar over Bedard right now because I know exactly what I have. There’s an element of unknown/projection no matter how good he looks right now. And even if he does indeed hit his ceiling, how much more could he help my team to win a cup than Matthews, McDavid and Makar?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

Bubbles

Die Hard for Bedard 2023
Apr 16, 2004
9,007
8,654
BC Teams:Nucks,Juve
Do people have bad memories or are they just confusing a prospect hype and what a player becomes? Mackinnon, Matthews and Makar (whoa MMM) were never considered generational before arriving in the NHL. The fact that they have become excellent players is a great achievement for them.

McDavid's final CHL season really cemented his generational status, and it remains to be seen if Bedard's upcoming season will reflect it.

My god I hate using the word "generational". Everyone has a different definition so the word is essentially meaningless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,751
16,933
Bedard’s elite asset is his shot. The rest of his tools are excellent, but I’d still take Matthews, McDavid and Makar over Bedard right now because I know exactly what I have. There’s an element of unknown/projection no matter how good he looks right now. And even if he does indeed hit his ceiling, how much more could he help my team to win a cup than Matthews, McDavid and Makar?

Taking less money once he hit his prime so a team can be build around him lol.
 

silkyjohnson50

Registered User
Jan 10, 2007
11,304
1,195
Hart/Lindsay/Richard/Art Ross trophy winner isn’t considered a level while discussing individual players’ potential? Especially in the context of how Bedard compares to recent first overall picks?

Does everything have to be a dick measuring contest?
Not when comparing it to McDavid, no. Not as a player and not as a prospect, which is what we’re talking about when discussing Bedard.

Matthews was a great prospect. A #1 most years. McDavid was the once every decade prospect. You’d have to go back to Crosby before McDavid wasn’t the unanimous #1 pick.

Matthews was not that level prospect and he’s not that level of player. McDavid is off to a historical start to his career that only a few guys compare to or better statistically speaking and Matthews is certainly not one of them. And one subjective Hart trophy - especially when McDavid comfortably outscored him and then went on to have a historic postseason performance - doesn’t change that. There’s a reason why Matthews - and a handful of other guys - are in the conversation for 2nd best player in the NHL.
 

Mathieukferland

Registered User
Oct 11, 2020
1,833
2,141
Sloane Square, Chelsea, England
Best prospect since Matthews/McDavid but I don’t think he’s on that level. Next tier below IMO because I don’t think his tools compare well. Tools matter a lot at the highest level. What can you do at a level that no one else can? Look at Mackinnon and Makar and their skating, for example.

His best quality is his shot, but I’m not so sure it would even be top 5 in the NHL.
McDavid is the generational player of his generation (2010s), that’s the tier, he’s one of one. Matthews/MacKinnon occupy the next one, which is more where I see Bédard. I don’t think Bédard will be generational, but his production is certainly generational to this point as a prospect , but that doesn’t always translate to the NHL, especially for a smaller player
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
96,128
108,758
Halifax
Best prospect since Matthews/McDavid but I don’t think he’s on that level. Next tier below IMO because I don’t think his tools compare well. Tools matter a lot at the highest level. What can you do at a level that no one else can? Look at Mackinnon and Makar and their skating, for example.

His best quality is his shot, but I’m not so sure it would even be top 5 in the NHL.

Yeah it's top 5 in the NHL.. and even if it -isn't-, its literally the best draft eligible shot we've ever seen so its completely reasonable to project it in the top 3 of the NHL.
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,438
12,966
Canada
Technically this is his D-2 WJHC. He will dominate the Christmas tournament in his D-1 tournament.

For comparisons we should look at the 2005 team where Crosby in his draft year was 4th in scoring behind Bergeron, Getz and Carter. I know that was a special team because of a lockout....but this team was similar with McTavish, Johnson et al.

Sure...Bedard didn't dominate....so what. He just turned 17.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad