lafellaesobar
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2022
- 857
- 500
Bedard's 16 year old season is probably more comparable to Stamkos' draft year, when you factor in WJC and how little help Bedard had in Regina - which is insane if you are calling Stamkos' draft year season tier 2.I disagree. I don't see Bedard as McDavid tier. I've been here a long time too. But, Bedard will get the crazy Canada WJC hype and such. I also wouldn't put Tavares ahead of that group you are talking about. Even after his 72 goal 16-year old season, Bob polled scouts entering the 2008 draft year, who would you take Tavares or Stamkos, and Stamkos won by like a 7-3 margin. And, that is arguably when Tavares hype was at its highest. I also wouldn't go in such a convoluted way. I'd say there were basically 2 names at the top since 04/05 lockout and that is Sid, then a tier of like Matthews, Eichel, MacKinnon, Tavares, and Stamkos. There wasn't clear separation. I expect Bedard to land in the latter tier. His 16 year old season was pretty comparable to Stamkos, especially if you factor in historically OHL scoring has translated better to NHL production than the WHL's by a slight margin.
Spezza and Bouwmeester also made it at 16, he'll Bouwmeester is the only one who made it as a late birthday. Stamkos also had like no help in Sarnia. And, I'm not gonna put too much weight on one game vs Austria. Congrats he made it. And, I'm not speaking on hype or whatever. I'm saying how I think he grades out. I know TSN will be going crazy over him all year.Bedard's 16 year old season is probably more comparable to Stamkos' draft year, when you factor in WJC and how little help Bedard had in Regina - which is insane if you are calling Stamkos' draft year season tier 2.
In terms of just hype the summer before the draft season - making the Team Canada as a 16 year old puts you so far ahead of the pack to the general public.
The hype rankings would be:
1. Crosby
2. Bedard/McDavid
yes, I know other have made it when they were 16 - I'm talking about recent history. I'm not putting any stock into the game against Austria, I was merely stating that Bedard made the team at 16 and Stammer at 17 - another reason why those 2 seasons are more comparable. Stammer still had a considerably better supporting cast. And the guy you originally replied to was talking about hype/buzz it looked like but reading isn't for everyone.Spezza and Bouwmeester also made it at 16, he'll Bouwmeester is the only one who made it as a late birthday. Stamkos also had like no help in Sarnia. And, I'm not gonna put too much weight on one game vs Austria. Congrats he made it. And, I'm not speaking on hype or whatever. I'm saying how I think he grades out. I know TSN will be going crazy over him all year.
I'm not sure he gets much taller. He seems to be of the small stocky build but will probably fill out more and who knows if whatever team he goes to inflates his height.
In a lot of cases if Bedard wasn't destroying the league to the extent he is (and Crosby was even a bigger version of this) scouts get scared on the growth potential of guys who are short but stocky at that age. It scared teams with Jake Wise, Adam Mascherin, and to a lesser extent Marco Rossi, compared to guys built like Marner, J. Hughes and Patrick Kane, who they feel will take bigger strides as they add muscle. This was a concern to an extent with Matt Savoie among scouts this year. But, if Bedard dominates to the level he's capable no one will care about it really, unless somehow Fantilli has a Hobey Baker level season which seems quite unlikely, and how teams will view Michkov is almost impossible to predict considering we have no idea what potential issues there are with Russian prospects now, let alone what the global political sphere is like in a year.
The way the lottery system works now I think Sorokin is too good to let that happen.He gonna be an islander
Both Bedard and Michkov who is also listed at about 5’8” and 160 (ish). Can’t remember the last time there were two more highly touted players in the same draft at 5’8”-5’9”. When I watched those guys last season they were both so electric.
If I recall correctly, he played there only 4 or 5 U20 league games and was on a 1.0 PPG., which is very good for his age (he was only 15 then) already, but the sample size is still that small that I don’t think you can make too much of conclusions on the basis of that.Does anyone recall his short stint with HV71? How did it go?
I remember asking this a long time ago - but forgot the answer
Better than Matthews.Shoots it like Matthews
Uh? The shooting technique's very different.Shoots it like Matthews
Uh? The shooting technique's very different.
This, by the way, is not true.This was a good article. Explains why Bedard is already a better shooter than Matthews
Not sure about shooting but I see him as more dynamic and a better prospectThis, by the way, is not true.
You're cringe.Better than Matthews.
Matthews’ drag shot is the NHL’s best weapon at the moment. Watching him play — and shoot — changed everything for Bedard.
“Even now, I’ll just search up videos on shooting, or just watch his goals,” Bedard says of Matthews. “I think I’ve seen all of his goals. It’s something I enjoy doing and I use it a lot. He obviously created it, and it’s become the shot I use the most.”
Yeah, thats why Bedard himself even said he learned that shooting technique by watching Matthews...Uh? The shooting technique's very different.
I think most people just underrated Matthews as a prospect at the time. Combination of immediately following the hype of McDavid as a prospect and taking a non traditional path for a top prospect. If people really want to act like a Matthews comparison is some kind of slight on Bedard they need to reevaluate.Leafs fans can cry all they want but the truth is that Bedard is the best shooter we've seen at this age, period.
Matthews obviously developed a lot and continued to grow but there's no one in Matthews class who thought he'd ever score 60 and most conceded Laine would be the better goal scorer.
But Bedard can already shoot it and one can conceive that he'll continue to develop further.
I think most people just underrated Matthews as a prospect at the time. Combination of immediately following the hype of McDavid as a prospect and taking a non traditional path for a top prospect. If people really want to act like a Matthews comparison is some kind of slight on Bedard they need to reevaluate.