It's your take on marketing that is bad.I just don't understand why is the NHL so bad with marketing? Why pump someone SO much before he even plays his first game?
very bad analysisC rating from me
(without an assist, 5 sog, it would have been D)
2/13 at face-offs (15 %)
was getting hit a lot
i did like his skating, was flying out there
took too many shot attempts, quality over quantity kiddo!, getting 5 sog
sounds nice, but none were quality shots, missed 1 scoring chance in the 1st
his 3rd period was his best, but even his 3rd period wasn't anything special
i did like his effort in his debut, some times he did too much, but it was his first game
play more simple and less is more
oh and what about his height?
Crosby is 5 foot 11 / 200 lbs, Bedard looked tiny next / facing him at the dot
Bedard is not not 5 foot 10 / 185 lbs, say what ever you want.
(i can see that with my eyes that he is not 5 foot 10)
ps, didnt pittsburgh player touch the puck front of the net,
it was also a rebound goal, so should his secondary assist count?
just made some observations thats all
Whatever you say, Leafer...C rating from me
(without an assist, 5 sog, it would have been D)
2/13 at face-offs (15 %)
was getting hit a lot
i did like his skating, was flying out there
took too many shot attempts, quality over quantity kiddo!, getting 5 sog
sounds nice, but none were quality shots, missed 1 scoring chance in the 1st
his 3rd period was his best, but even his 3rd period wasn't anything special
i did like his effort in his debut, some times he did too much, but it was his first game
play more simple and less is more
oh and what about his height?
Crosby is 5 foot 11 / 200 lbs, Bedard looked tiny next / facing him at the dot
Bedard is not not 5 foot 10 / 185 lbs, say what ever you want.
(i can see that with my eyes that he is not 5 foot 10)
ps, didnt pittsburgh player touch the puck front of the net,
it was also a rebound goal, so should his secondary assist count?
just made some observations thats all
C rating from me
(without an assist, 5 sog, it would have been D)
2/13 at face-offs (15 %)
was getting hit a lot
i did like his skating, was flying out there
took too many shot attempts, quality over quantity kiddo!, getting 5 sog
sounds nice, but none were quality shots, missed 1 scoring chance in the 1st
his 3rd period was his best, but even his 3rd period wasn't anything special
i did like his effort in his debut, some times he did too much, but it was his first game
play more simple and less is more
oh and what about his height?
Crosby is 5 foot 11 / 200 lbs, Bedard looked tiny next / facing him at the dot
Bedard is not not 5 foot 10 / 185 lbs, say what ever you want.
(i can see that with my eyes that he is not 5 foot 10)
ps, didnt pittsburgh player touch the puck front of the net,
it was also a rebound goal, so should his secondary assist count?
just made some observations thats all
That stood out for me and I think that aside from his elite shot he has some really good hockey IQ going on.He’s been Chicago’s best outskater. Surprised actually at his defensive anticipation, has broken up several plays, something which he didn’t really do in Regina
A reminder that you thought DeBrincat was going to score 60 goals in a season and thought he was a colossal disappointment when he didn'tC rating from me
(without an assist, 5 sog, it would have been D)
2/13 at face-offs (15 %)
was getting hit a lot
i did like his skating, was flying out there
took too many shot attempts, quality over quantity kiddo!, getting 5 sog
sounds nice, but none were quality shots, missed 1 scoring chance in the 1st
his 3rd period was his best, but even his 3rd period wasn't anything special
i did like his effort in his debut, some times he did too much, but it was his first game
play more simple and less is more
oh and what about his height?
Crosby is 5 foot 11 / 200 lbs, Bedard looked tiny next / facing him at the dot
Bedard is not not 5 foot 10 / 185 lbs, say what ever you want.
(i can see that with my eyes that he is not 5 foot 10)
ps, didnt pittsburgh player touch the puck front of the net,
it was also a rebound goal, so should his secondary assist count?
just made some observations thats all
It's your take on marketing that is bad.
It's marketing 101. Even the newest newb at the marketing firm would know you gotta milk Bedard's first steps in this league. You gotta milk every firsts with this projected prodigy. That's the story today.
Tomorrow, there are dozens of possible stories. But you only get one first NHL game.
I think he's going to be an elite player, I don't see the generational ala Crosby / Mcdavid, same thing I said when I saw him play in Juniors. I see him more in the top 5 - 10 player tier than generational. Which is f***ing great for Blackhawks fans, surefire top tier talent to build around.
lol marketing 101 for dogs
There's so many stories in the NHL, Bedard's is only one of them and to be honest it should be ranked like no5-10, its the NHL thats so bad, it does nothing with the other stories.
McDavid is legit the face of the league, he should be equal to LeBron, 150 pts season.. thats an historical achievement.
Ovechkin's road to 900, nada
There's so many more stories they can come up with
Yeah same, there's no generational talent in him, speed is avg,
Also he needs further physical development
A reminder that you thought DeBrincat was going to score 60 goals in a season and thought he was a colossal disappointment when he didn't
One of the hallmarks of an offensive superstar is that they look like they have a quiet game and still come away with a point. Other players can have the game of their life and come away with zeros across the board.