Ryan Kesler minus the willingness to fight has better hands but will do everything else the same.
Please leave him with the Knights next season![]()
His comparables are Bergeron, Richards, Kesler, I'd say Bergeron is probably the closest as I think he's smarter than both Richards and Kesler
Cody Hodgson. He did well in Vancouver, right?
Ideally, but judging by our cap situation and Gillis saying that we're gonna use a couple rookies next year , I think it's a real possibility he plays with the big club. At least for the 9 games anyways.
Please leave him with the Knights next season![]()
Ideally, but judging by our cap situation and Gillis saying that we're gonna use a couple rookies next year , I think it's a real possibility he plays with the big club. At least for the 9 games anyways.
That is interesting projection as Richards was cited in 2003 as being a prospect who was a smart, crafty player.
He wasn't even PPG last year, he's DEFINITELY not NHL ready, unless you want to groom him into a 3rd liner.
Pierre McGuire said that he spoke with one assistant GM who had Horvat ranked #4 ahead of Barkov.
That GM should be fired. Feaster had Poirier as a top 10 player and Jankowski as the best player in the draft. One (assistant) GMs deluded opinion means nothing.
IMO Horvat needs at least 2 seasons in the OHL. I'd say 1 OHL and 1 AHL, but the NHL is dumb for not allowing that.
That GM should be fired. Feaster had Poirier as a top 10 player and Jankowski as the best player in the draft. One (assistant) GMs deluded opinion means nothing.
IMO Horvat needs at least 2 seasons in the OHL. I'd say 1 OHL and 1 AHL, but the NHL is dumb for not allowing that.
Multiple Teams had him ranked 5-6. GIllis said he had Gm's coming up to him on the draft floor saying the pick was a steal.
A steal at 10? How is that even possible, especially when he was ranked 12-15 by most major scouting services.
He was in the playoffs.
He wasn't even PPG last year, he's DEFINITELY not NHL ready, unless you want to groom him into a 3rd liner.
A steal at 10? How is that even possible, especially when he was ranked 12-15 by most major scouting services.
No. I would prefer Hodgson over Horvat any day. I think Horvat is majorly overrated.
Someone's butt hurt that we didn't take Nichuskin or traded Schneider.![]()
No many think he is more a sure thing.No, I think the point is that how was a player ranked between 12th and 15th by certain major scouting organizations considered a steal when said player was drafted 9th. I imagine for Canuck fans it is great to think that you nabbed the next Kesler, Bergeron, Backes, Richards, etc... with your pick, but if the kid was guaranteed to reach that level (elite NHL star center) he probably would not have been ranked or picked so low. Horvat probably has just as good of chance of being the next Brassard, Brule, Sutter, Wilson, etc... as he does the players above.
That GM should be fired. Feaster had Poirier as a top 10 player and Jankowski as the best player in the draft. One (assistant) GMs deluded opinion means nothing.
IMO Horvat needs at least 2 seasons in the OHL. I'd say 1 OHL and 1 AHL, but the NHL is dumb for not allowing that.
We talkin' crazy old cout Feaster or about Horvat?
To me Horvat is a fine pick at 9. I know the Sens loved him and wanted to move up into the top 10 to take him.
Poirier at 10 really?![]()