Woll Smoth
Registered User
can you say that with 100 percent metaphysical certitude?
Yes.
10A
1OA
can you say that with 100 percent metaphysical certitude?
Matthews will be the #1 pick, period.
Laine and Puljujarvi are great prospects but this guy will be a top 6 forward in the NHL as soon as he's drafted. He's just more of a complete player as of now and his potential is obviously through the roof so there's literally no reason not to pick him.
I said this watching the last U-18 tournament where we went head to head against USA in the finals. Laine and Pulju made stuff happen in the occasional shift but this Matthews guy was scary every time he stepped on the ice.
To start the season PPG in the best league after NHL and KHL makes me not doubt myself.
The thing is NA players are always in a better physical shape than Finnish players at this age which already gives them the edge. It took a freak of nature Barkov who is naturally build like a truck for us to produce an NHL-ready 18 yr old forward. It's going to take years before we will actually see which player is the best, Laine and Pulju look good now but we've all seen what the difference of FEL and NHL is.
Unless we have a superstar prospect going to the CHL before his draft year in the future im going to eat my hat if we'll see a Finnish player picked #1 overall as long as there's prospects like Matthews out there.
Agree with most of this, but the NLA is not the 3rd best league in the world. 6th or possibly 5th I would say.
So you're saying the SHL and the AHL are better ? Can't say i agree. Debatable yes but the NLA have the most money to spend and now that hockey has grown in Switzerland i think the teams look very good.
That's a topic for another discussion though.
So you're saying the SHL and the AHL are better ? Can't say i agree. Debatable yes but the NLA have the most money to spend and now that hockey has grown in Switzerland i think the teams look very good.
That's a topic for another discussion though.
Let's not revive this topic again...
It's not debatable.... SHL is better than NLA there's no point even attempting to dispute this. Last year SHL and Liiga dominated Champions Hockey League
Stop it, that's just too obvious on trying only to provoke Finnish posters on purpose, because that's bull**** and you know it as well.
NLA is probably the most attractive league to foreigners, but mostly because of the money, short distances and living standards.
SHL is better than the Swiss League, and I'm a regular watcher of the NLA.
NHL
KHL
SHL
AHL/NLA
Liiga
No way NLA is better than liiga. I've been living in finland and switzerland. Have watched dozens of games. NLA top teams might have few shiny names that Liiga teams don't have and teams like Bern and zurich might be on the same level with top teams from liiga but overall depth is nowhere near Liiga. To me it's ridiculous to even think that. That's how far it is from liiga. Depth player in NLA teams(bottom 6 players) and most of the bottom 9 is nowhere near level of liiga player. Closer to Mestis level. Yeah NLA has more star players, it has more star players than SHL teams too but overall depth is poor compared to both of these leagues.
NHL
KHL
SHL
Liiga
AHL/NLA
Early on when Matthew's was still undecided about where he wanted to go, the NLA was being compared to the SHL. People from the area were very confident in say they were comparable with the SHL a bit ahead. However, since Matthews joined the NLA and showed he may bet the best player in the NLA, the NLA has suddenly become a joke league. Not comparable to the SHL. Now it isn't comparable to Liiga.
Is that a coincidence? I find it odd how well spoken of the league (NLA) was until Matthews shined playing in it.
There's literally no way Liiga is better.
I don't think the Swiss teams care that much about the CHL. I mean they have much bigger crowds back home in NLA games.
NLA teams dont do as well in Champions Hockey League because they don't care about winning? Well what kind of a competitive league is that then?
That's such a childish statement to be like "it's not like i wanted to win anyway!!"
It's not like SHL or Liiga care more about Champions Hockey League than NLA; it's more of a parenthesis tournament here.
But competitive teams compete
No way NLA is better than liiga. I've been living in finland and switzerland. Have watched dozens of games. NLA top teams might have few shiny names that Liiga teams don't have and teams like Bern and zurich might be on the same level with top teams from liiga but overall depth is nowhere near Liiga. To me it's ridiculous to even think that. That's how far it is from liiga. Depth player in NLA teams(bottom 6 players) and most of the bottom 9 is nowhere near level of liiga player. Closer to Mestis level. Yeah NLA has more star players, it has more star players than SHL teams too but overall depth is poor compared to both of these leagues.
NHL
KHL
SHL
Liiga
AHL/NLA
You have Liiga as a better league than AHL, so i can't really take your comment about the NLA seriously.
Sounds like you're just biased.
I don't care if people have different opinions on these 4 leagues but to say any league is far better than the other is just simply wrong.
1. nhl
2. khl
3. ahl/shl
4.nla/liiga
personally i see 4 different tiers
The talent in AHL is close to SHL but the level of hockey played is far behind. AHL is a second-tier league that supports NHL and it can be seen in the games.
And I've been disappointed with the NLA's top teams when they've played against SHL and Liiga teams because that's where I thought they could compete. But when the top teams in NLA lose to top teams in Liiga there's no way NLA is better than Liiga. Your average Finnish player is still few steps ahead of average Swiss player so Liiga wins in depth.
And I've been disappointed with the NLA's top teams when they've played against SHL and Liiga teams because that's where I thought they could compete. But when the top teams in NLA lose to top teams in Liiga there's no way NLA is better than Liiga. Your average Finnish player is still few steps ahead of average Swiss player so Liiga wins in depth.
2+2 in first 3 games in the larger rink in one of the top leagues playing against professional men.
Thanks for the update. However, there is no reason to count expedition games.Forgot about his one CHL game were he had an assist. So 2+3 in 4 games combined.
Laine has 5+4 in 11 CHL and Liiga games combined so far.
Still pretty early but pointwise the race might get close considering the differences in the leagues. There are obviously other aspects to consider besides the points too.
You have Liiga as a better league than AHL, so i can't really take your comment about the NLA seriously.
Sounds like you're just biased.
I don't care if people have different opinions on these 4 leagues but to say any league is far better than the other is just simply wrong.