Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
buffalo counters with justin bailey for matthew tkachuk, just because its an equally terrible offer
What has he done last season to up his value from 15th overall to 8th overall plus a roster player who got a top 4 defenseman straight up and another prospect?
buffalo counters with justin bailey for matthew tkachuk, just because its an equally terrible offer
I'm sorry, but if you're insulted with a top prospect who was once hailed as a top 5-10 pick, but only fell because of 'attitude' (there have been no issues in Stockton), that you'd compare him to a prospect that might be a third line guy, that's pretty ridiculous.
I like how Nylander has suddenly become "might be a third line guy".
I'm done thinking you might have a clue about what your talking about. Your as bad as OP.
You fail to understand or acknowledge that Kylington is one whole year ahead of Nylander in his development. You compare .6 to .5, when in fact you should be comparing .6 to .25 (Kylington's PPG his first year in Stockton). And yeah, I think of Kylington as a offensive Dman because he isn't a defensive Dman. Maybe he's starting to get his D game right, whatever. It doesn't matter to me because the premise of this thread is ridiculous, and you chipped in with more silly.
You're replying to a guy comparing the offensive production of a forward to offensive production of a defenseman. If you're going to comment about how players are analyzed in the AHL, you might want to start there.for the most part HF doesn't understand the concept of a 19 year old in the AHL so I wouldn't hold out much hope for them to start analyzing 18 year old players in that league correctly.
You shouldn't be comparing their offensive output anyway. It's a terrible argument.
You're replying to a guy comparing the offensive production of a forward to offensive production of a defenseman. If you're going to comment about how players are analyzed in the AHL, you might want to start there.
I'm sorry, but if you're insulted with a top prospect who was once hailed as a top 5-10 pick, but only fell because of 'attitude' (there have been no issues in Stockton), that you'd compare him to a prospect that might be a third line guy, that's pretty ridiculous.
It seems not many people in this thread have actually watched a 2016-17 Stockton Heat game. Kylington is by far the more valuable piece going forward, that will become clear during the WJC where both players will play together. The only reason I would be willing to trade him is because Nylander fits a need better.
This same poster thinks Monahan is a 3C, made up something called winger goals, says Jankowski can replace Monahan now..... etc and now he/she thinks Kylington for Nylander is a fair trade. It's really par for the course.
I'm sorry, but if you're insulted with a top prospect who was once hailed as a top 5-10 pick, but only fell because of 'attitude' (there have been no issues in Stockton), that you'd compare him to a prospect that might be a third line guy, that's pretty ridiculous.
While I would like a player like Kylington in the system, I am not trading a player with Nylander's skill for Kylington. It would require a more highly touted prospect. I would offer someone like Baptiste who is PPG in the A this year and has shown promise at the NHL level (although he maxes out as a 2nd liner).
Dont think something like that would interest the Flames fans.
Bailey might be a third-liner just as much as Kylington might be a bottom-pairing guy, so Tkatchuk for Bailey is a fair comparison.
Bailey has all the tools to be an electrifying top 6 power forward, he has developed well and he's NHL-ready to boot, but who knows if he's going to reach that ceiling.
Not a bad proposal. Baptiste for Kylington would have the Flames swap a bit of potential for more sure-fire NHL-readiness.
I know I can overvalue some of our prospects sometimes (Janko, Klimchuk, Gilles... etc), but this thread is just beyond words in how terrible it is.What a painful thread. Most flames fans all know nylander >> kylington in value right now.
I know I can overvalue some of our prospects sometimes (Janko, Klimchuk, Gilles... etc), but this thread is just beyond words in how terrible it is.
how about Kylington for Risto? You know by reading the OP that Kylington is a complete studResponding to the OP only. As a Buffalo fan this is an insta-no