Confirmed with Link: [BUF/OTT] Dylan Cozens, Dennis Gilbert, and 2026 2nd for Josh Norris and Jacob Bernard-Docker

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Norris has a total of 12 5v5 points this year while playing mostly with Batherson & Tkachuk... His points/60 rate of 1.14 puts him between Quinn and Malenstyn on our team, and just below noted offensive dynamos Dennis Gilbert and Peyton Krebs.

1741383123677.png


(I will get back to being positive eventually, but the snark is strong right now)
 
Norris has a total of 12 5v5 points this year while playing mostly with Batherson & Tkachuk... His points/60 rate of 1.14 puts him between Quinn and Malenstyn on our team, and just below noted offensive dynamos Dennis Gilbert and Peyton Krebs.

View attachment 989363

(I will get back to being positive eventually, but the snark is strong right now)
What about his defense and PP? Our problem is not scoring goals 5vs5, we are very good there, but our forwards are not very good in defense and two-way game, and PP also needs to improve.
 
Subtracting the zero-IQ play killing of Cozens should reverberate positive impacts throughout the lineup.

He played the game the wrong way the last two seasons. Maybe he can change that in Ottawa, maybe not.

But he was a truly infuriating player to root for.
In my 50 years of watching the Sabres, I would say he has been the most infuriating player. I really can't think of another. Maybe Ristolainen???
 
Kevyn says Norris is a guy he's watched for a while and really likes. Last guy he said that about was byram
 
I loved cozens and wanted him to work but it was time. Wish we could’ve tried him on wing but I think this trade makes sense. If Norris can be a decent 2C, it’s a win. Cozens wasn’t going to be that
 
  • Like
Reactions: MOGlLNY
What about his defense and PP? Our problem is not scoring goals 5vs5, we are very good there, but our forwards are not very good in defense and two-way game, and PP also needs to improve.
I think it is pretty obvious that the Sabres powerplay lacks players with creativity that create time and space on the ice. They have a ton of finishers that can shoot the puck. Ottawa has a lot of creative guys in Stutzle, Giroux, and Batherson for Norris to play with on the PP. Long story short, Norris is going to bring a lot of what the Sabres already have on their PP, so I do not believe he is going to be quite the PP savior that a lot of stat watchers who see his PP points believe he will be.
 
I think it is pretty obvious that the Sabres powerplay lacks players with creativity that create time and space on the ice. They have a ton of finishers that can shoot the puck. Ottawa has a lot of creative guys in Stutzle, Giroux, and Batherson for Norris to play with on the PP. Long story short, Norris is going to bring a lot of what the Sabres already have on their PP, so I do not believe he is going to be quite the PP savior that a lot of stat watchers who see his PP points believe he will be.
Well, I think it will help on PP, especially in contrast to Cozens. That doesn't mean we can't add a playmaker, but I think Norris fits us well as a player overall.
 
I think it is pretty obvious that the Sabres powerplay lacks players with creativity that create time and space on the ice. They have a ton of finishers that can shoot the puck. Ottawa has a lot of creative guys in Stutzle, Giroux, and Batherson for Norris to play with on the PP. Long story short, Norris is going to bring a lot of what the Sabres already have on their PP, so I do not believe he is going to be quite the PP savior that a lot of stat watchers who see his PP points believe he will be.
Norris wins puck battles once in a while and in the top 6. We currently don't really have that. Could go a long way on the PP, even if he isn't actually productive himself.
 

Ad

Ad