Toggle sidebar

OT: Buccaneers, Rays & Other Tampa Bay Sports Teams

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Wonder if they can fix that in time for next season. I guess so. But man that's a lot of money and work they gotta spend for a stadium they're moving out of..
 
www.news-press.com

If Tropicana Field can't be fixed before 2025 season, where can Tampa Bay Rays play?

The Tropicana Field roof was torn off by Hurricane Milton. The Tampa Bay Rays have some options if the field isn't ready for the 2025 MLB season.
www.news-press.com www.news-press.com

As far as I am concerned, move the Rays to Steinbrenner Field for the last 3 years and be done with it. If the A's can play in Sacramento we can do this. I'm not saying I never once had a great night at Tropicana Field and countless memories. I'm saying this may not be the most appropriate option while the other side of the Bay is ready to welcome the Rays with open arms. And Steinbrenner Field just *chefs kiss*


Now watch Stu use this as an excuse to fire sale the team again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Major4Boarding and Hoek
I'm not a baseball guy, but couldn't the Rays play in the Trop while there's only a partial or tarped roof?
 
Felonious Python said:
I'm not a baseball guy, but couldn't the Rays play in the Trop while there's only a partial or tarped roof?
Click to expand...
I don't think so. They'd probably assume some kind of occupational hazard with it being partial like that. And to be honest, it may just be better if the Rays played their last game at Tropicana anyway
 
Can't imagine it's designed for dealing with rain falling in so they definitely need to close it somehow
 
Hoek said:
Can't imagine it's designed for dealing with rain falling in so they definitely need to close it somehow
Click to expand...
@Felonious Python this is where I'm at with it. I don't know if the Trop is even considered safe with the roof being open or if it can even handle being open. But there are a bunch of ballparks that can host Rays even if the plan was to be back in the Trop by like May; assuming the cost isn't extraordinary. Like Steinbrenner was a mere suggestion at most and I think the Rays would do something like that for a few months versus being on the road.

But if this is gonna be some crazy thing like $70 million, then I say just forget it. That money is better spent on the new park and work out a deal with an "A League" park
 
These Are The Days said:
@Felonious Python this is where I'm at with it. I don't know if the Trop is even considered safe with the roof being open or if it can even handle being open. But there are a bunch of ballparks that can host Rays even if the plan was to be back in the Trop by like May; assuming the cost isn't extraordinary. Like Steinbrenner was a mere suggestion at most and I think the Rays would do something like that for a few months versus being on the road.

But if this is gonna be some crazy thing like $70 million, then I say just forget it. That money is better spent on the new park and work out a deal with an "A League" park
Click to expand...
NBC News Can Tampa Bay Rays replace shredded stadium roof in time for next season?
It cost about $18 million at that time to repair the Minnesota Vikings' ceiling by July of the following year. Given inflation and the added cost of rushing to get Tropicana Field ready for Opening Day 2025, a straight replacement could potentially cost at least double the Metrodome bill.
Click to expand...

Playing in a smaller stadium for a long time would be damaging. It's okay for the A's, as they're leaving Oakland.

I'm not saying they should play in a building that's not structurally sound, but if it's mostly an aesthetic thing, I don't see why a partial roof wouldn't be allowed.

The roof was made of fiberglass and cloth. The beams holding it all up are still there.
 
Last edited:
They can't play without a roof at the Trop. Even if everything is structurally sound, the arena was designed and built with no drainage system in place. They also need to assess how.much water damage and looding the rains caused. There's no way they'd play there without it being enclosed.



.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoek
Steinbrenner would be great for building the fanbase on the Tampa side of the bay though. Would test the "won't cross a bridge" hypothesis.

I have a feeling the Yankees won't go for it.
 
Hoek said:
Steinbrenner would be great for building the fanbase on the Tampa side of the bay though. Would test the "won't cross a bridge" hypothesis.

I have a feeling the Yankees won't go for it.
Click to expand...
I'd think the Yankees would go for it.

It'd be saying that the Yankees have the best stadium in an area full of them, and the Rays would be paying for upgrades to bring it closer to MLB standards.

Has any work started on the trop? They've got to do something soonish. The drainage problems aren't going anywhere.
 
Hoek said:
Steinbrenner would be great for building the fanbase on the Tampa side of the bay though. Would test the "won't cross a bridge" hypothesis.

I have a feeling the Yankees won't go for it.
Click to expand...
They're lucky we didn't blow it up and build our new stadium there. Almost any agreement can be broken and the lease with Tampa is likely no exception
 

Brodie Brazil likes to give hot takes on things, so take his opinions with a grain of salt.

What I could see being an issue is that the roof was pretty far past it's intended lifespan. The insurance company might not like that.
 
Last edited:
Felonious Python said:
What I mean is that the insurance company could try to find a way to contest an insurance payout as the roof wasn't replaced when it was designed to be.
Click to expand...
Nah I get what you mean. I'm siding with that logic and chances are the Rays aren't gonna get anyone to cover that. I've read the damage is $40 million and if that is true.... well. You have other options because I don't know if that's the best one
 
1729129087408.jpeg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: J T Money and These Are The Days
Unfortunately, neither Tampa team decided to show up. Putrid showing from a supposedly good pass offense against a pass defense even worse than Tampa's.
 
JTBF81 said:
Unfortunately, neither Tampa team decided to show up. Putrid showing from a supposedly good pass offense against a pass defense even worse than Tampa's.
Click to expand...
Evans going down gutted the team and crowd.

Not to mention not having him in the game hurts.
 
Flat out, the defense is one of the worst in the league. The secondary is a joke, and the pass rush isn't close to good enough either. They had good things going and a great chance to keep momentum and go up 17-7, and Mayfield chokes. Then again on the next possession and any advantage was over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom