I don't think so. They'd probably assume some kind of occupational hazard with it being partial like that. And to be honest, it may just be better if the Rays played their last game at Tropicana anywayI'm not a baseball guy, but couldn't the Rays play in the Trop while there's only a partial or tarped roof?
@Felonious Python this is where I'm at with it. I don't know if the Trop is even considered safe with the roof being open or if it can even handle being open. But there are a bunch of ballparks that can host Rays even if the plan was to be back in the Trop by like May; assuming the cost isn't extraordinary. Like Steinbrenner was a mere suggestion at most and I think the Rays would do something like that for a few months versus being on the road.Can't imagine it's designed for dealing with rain falling in so they definitely need to close it somehow
NBC News Can Tampa Bay Rays replace shredded stadium roof in time for next season?@Felonious Python this is where I'm at with it. I don't know if the Trop is even considered safe with the roof being open or if it can even handle being open. But there are a bunch of ballparks that can host Rays even if the plan was to be back in the Trop by like May; assuming the cost isn't extraordinary. Like Steinbrenner was a mere suggestion at most and I think the Rays would do something like that for a few months versus being on the road.
But if this is gonna be some crazy thing like $70 million, then I say just forget it. That money is better spent on the new park and work out a deal with an "A League" park
It cost about $18 million at that time to repair the Minnesota Vikings' ceiling by July of the following year. Given inflation and the added cost of rushing to get Tropicana Field ready for Opening Day 2025, a straight replacement could potentially cost at least double the Metrodome bill.
I'd think the Yankees would go for it.Steinbrenner would be great for building the fanbase on the Tampa side of the bay though. Would test the "won't cross a bridge" hypothesis.
I have a feeling the Yankees won't go for it.
They're lucky we didn't blow it up and build our new stadium there. Almost any agreement can be broken and the lease with Tampa is likely no exceptionSteinbrenner would be great for building the fanbase on the Tampa side of the bay though. Would test the "won't cross a bridge" hypothesis.
I have a feeling the Yankees won't go for it.
Brodie Brazil likes to give hot takes on things, so take his opinions with a grain of salt.
What I could see being an issue is that the roof was pretty far past it's intended lifespan. The insurance company might not like that.
What I mean is that the insurance company could try to find a way to contest an insurance payout as the roof wasn't replaced when it was designed to be.That roof was 25 years old many years ago. It was well past the expiration
Nah I get what you mean. I'm siding with that logic and chances are the Rays aren't gonna get anyone to cover that. I've read the damage is $40 million and if that is true.... well. You have other options because I don't know if that's the best oneWhat I mean is that the insurance company could try to find a way to contest an insurance payout as the roof wasn't replaced when it was designed to be.
Evans going down gutted the team and crowd.Unfortunately, neither Tampa team decided to show up. Putrid showing from a supposedly good pass offense against a pass defense even worse than Tampa's.
Evans was having problems all week with it though, so him re-injuring his hamstring wasn't that big of a shock. It was still a pitiful effort.Evans going down gutted the team and crowd.
Not to mention not having him in the game hurts.