Bjork and heinan are regressing i would sell high as much as I can for these guys. Debrusk lauzon JFK senyshyn donato off table. Schmaltz is not chicken feed a former 1 st round pick who can pop 20 with ease and so young . It's a no brainer for me.
There is so much wrong with this post. See bolded and accompanying critique below.
1. Let me get this straight. Heinen and Bjork are regressing....but Nick Schmatltz isn't? Every player in the trade between CHI and ARZ is "regressing" if you are speaking purely from a statistical standpoint.
2. How does one "sell high" on players who are "regressing?"
3. Why are Bjork and Heinen (two players who have made an impact at the NHL level) on the table but Lauzon, JFK, Donato and Senyshyn are OFF the table?
4. Schmaltz is on pace for
8 goals this year.
Let me also add this - you make it sound as simple as Sweeney picking up the phone and snagging Schmaltz for Bjork and Heinen. Look at the return CHI got from ARZ. Dylan Strome has struggled but he was a 3rd overall pick. They are looking to reunite him with Alex Debrincat - with whom he played in Erie of the OHL. Brendan Perlini is another former first rounder who has produced around the same rate as Schmaltz. Even if the Bruins wanted to make a push for Schmaltz, why would Stan Bowman take Heinen and Bjork over Strome and Perlini?