Viletho
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2015
- 3,863
- 1,327
Why ? lolLMAO 1200 still shitting on Branny somehow.
He's been great at what he has been asked to do..
Why ? lolLMAO 1200 still shitting on Branny somehow.
You are hearing what you want to hear. He said everyone wants big mobile D which is true.
Sometimes they have to be ugly. But I agree. However, Boston has been playing fairly well over the past few games. I was seriously concerned about our chances. This game proves we can compete with the top teams.the sens have to fix their defensive game if they want a chance at the playoffs
this was a very very ugly win
Caller criticized Brannstrom and then said he wants a big mobile D.Lmao he literally said that how am I hearing "what I want".
Caller criticized Brannstrom and then said he wants a big mobile D.
Baker responds that every team wants big mobile D.
Baker never criticized Brannstrom.
Caller criticized Brannstrom and then said he wants a big mobile D.
Baker responds that every team wants big mobile D.
Baker never criticized Brannstrom.
Dunno man. It's not always about size. It's how you use it.You are hearing what you want to hear. He said everyone wants big mobile D which is true.
Of course you would take the bigger player if they had the same skills.He was directly discussing Brannstrom and while this might not be his exact words he basically said "would you rather have a bigger D in his spot? Yes."
Keep trying though.
I mean, if I could have a 7 foot tall Tim Stutzle I would.
Buffalo almost has one.
Brannstrom? The little guy, right? Yeah, little guys get overlooked sometimes.The thing is they only say this shit about Brannstrom even when he's one of the better players on the ice.
Brannstrom? The little guy, right? Yeah, little guys get overlooked sometimes.