Brooks claimed by Jets

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I feel we're going to be fast approaching the Brent Ashton or Mike Sillinger of the waiver wire here if the current rate keeps up! ;)
 
I wonder if the Leafs talked to Vegas and they are doing Toronto a solid, after extending Amadio. Or, if they're just taking the gamble in an effort to gain center depth.

It will be interesting if Vegas reclaims him tomorrow. You don't see that move tried often.
 
I wonder if the Leafs talked to Vegas and they are doing Toronto a solid, after extending Amadio. Or, if they're just taking the gamble in an effort to gain center depth.

Vegas did not have more use for Brooks, and barely used him in the first place.

He was injured for a bit, went on a long rehab stint in Henderson, and then Eichel came back. They don't have room for him.
 
He will clear. Nothing to see here. We already knew Brooks can't crack the roster this year but they seem to still like him for another try next year.
 


If Vegas does claim him, this was orchestrated by Dubas and Vegas, as a favour to Vegas.

Don't they owe us one for 3rd party on Lehner? I say Brooks clears and the slate is clean.

Vegas must see something in Brooks then if this is true. They probably saw Marchment and reasoned its better to be safe than sorry with these ex Leafs :laugh:
 


If Vegas does claim him, this was orchestrated by Dubas and Vegas, as a favour to Vegas.

Didn't Keefe say something about always liked him and wanting to bring him back? Was that just a smoke screen?
 
Hi Brooksie, bye Brooksie.

0XaqFSU.gif
 
I would guess they tried to claim him to be able to send him down if nobody else did(since they waived him earlier this year) but since someone else claimed him behind us we couldn't. We want Liljegren in the lineup so we re-waive him to accomplish that, if he clears great, if not oh well, worth a try.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nylanderthal
This makes no sense.

If people liked Brooks, and Dubas brought him back, then it confirms Leafs regret losing him and Brooks is worth having in the organization.

One of our top prospects had to be sent down to accommodate Brooks who can't even play.

Sorry but this one's a clear win for team Brooks and Dubas seems to agree.


Oopsies I quoted the wrong person. I'm on my phone this thing is a mess with ads I'm not fixing it lol its obvious what post this goes to
I had this issue until I downloaded the Brave mobile browser. I just use it for here and realgm which are both unusable in their current formats without ad blocking
 
I would guess they tried to claim him to be able to send him down if nobody else did(since they waived him earlier this year) but since someone else claimed him behind us we couldn't. We want Liljegren in the lineup so we re-waive him to accomplish that, if he clears great, if not oh well, worth a try.
Pretty much, tonight is fine… Dermott has to get back in at some point as well so for A GAME it’s fine.
 
Why wouldn't they have just let him pass through waivers yesterday then get him for future considerations or some other no cost deal. Seems like a waste of time to do it this way
 
Last edited:
Why wouldn't they have just let him pass through waivers yesterday then get him for future considerations or since other no cost deal. Seems like a waste of time to do it this way

Maybe Vegas didn't want to move him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad