isn't that his salary this year . i thought you had to tack another 10% on that ?
Value of: Brock Boeser
- Thread starter Canucks LB
- Start date
deckercky
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2010
- 9,382
- 2,461
No. There's only a baked in increase for very low salaries. Boeser has a $7.5m qualifying offer.
i see . i was under the impression that his qualifying offer was coming in at over 8 million and that vancouver really didn't wanna go that high so that's why you see boeser being mentioned so frequently now
Canadian Canuck
Hughes4Calder
deckercky
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2010
- 9,382
- 2,461
Canucks have 3 real bargaining chips with legitimate value (Miller/Horvat/Boeser). All are under control for this year and next year. If the team wants to actually shake things up, one of those players will be moved.
so is boeser worth 7.5 million on a multi year deal ? would a 1 yr deal bring him right to ufa ? i would think miller would be the guy to cash in based on age , future salary demands....
Diamonddog01
Diamond in the rough
Just A Bit Outside
Playoffs??!
- Mar 6, 2010
- 17,441
- 17,054
9M if you're Jeff Skinner.
i'm not sure . we're paying one 5.5 and i don't think we're getting our money's worth (drouin )
Tempo
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2019
- 390
- 653
probably as much as the 29 year old diminutive 45-50 point player the Habs pay 6.5M to. Although he may see the Habs paid their 40 point 23 year old centre 7.875M and think if he brings his average defensive game to above average, he could ask for the same.
Cornwallace
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2021
- 299
- 690
That's a really odd way of describing a player who is the 10th highest scorer amongst RW's since he entered the league full-time
Boondock
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2009
- 5,780
- 2,390
4 x 1sts are futures I would consider. Good proposalCounter future consideratios for EP
Boondock
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2009
- 5,780
- 2,390
Maybe not, but people on here have no issue making offers based on stat watching from the previous 5-6 games before the coaching change.
Most of these posters aren't fans either. I know this because it is quite obvious they don't watch the players they are posting about. They may be fans of their own team but clearly do not watch any other teams unless they are playing their own team.
Tell me you don' know anything without telling me you don't know anything.
They should be trading 2 or 3 of them. The Canucks need to free up cap flexibility, thanks to the lingering consequences of employing Benning. All 3 will require significant cap/term investments to retain. And Horvat and Miller are likely going to age out of the Canucks competitive timeline.
They'll need to retool with a younger group. The core is going to be Petey/Hughes/Demko/Podz/Hoglander. Maybe Boeser fits in that. I really don't see Miller or Horvat doing so.
Sold
4 of the be 5 years you get our 1st if we get a top 5 pick we can bump it but only once
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 26,968
- 12,135
I do think Boeser is the young piece to potentially shop, to bolster the blueline long-term. He's got the sort of "value" to actually fetch something resembling what the Canucks desperately need. And his nature as a kind of frustrating, streaky "pure sniper" makes him more palatable to move. But it'd definitely hurt, losing that pure finishing ability. One of those things that can be hard to appreciate, until it's gone.
It'd have to be a 1-for-1 sort of swap for a really good young defenceman. And that sort of deal is probably tough, because what teams genuinely have a real "surplus" of quality young defencemen to deal from?
It'd have to be a 1-for-1 sort of swap for a really good young defenceman. And that sort of deal is probably tough, because what teams genuinely have a real "surplus" of quality young defencemen to deal from?
nowhereman
Registered User
Where's this fantasyland nonsense coming from? The Canucks aren't just going to let him walk without qualifying him. Don't be obtuse.
He's paced at 66 points since his rookie year and is a very competent all-around player. You should probably know what you're talking about before speaking up.
I disagree with your assessment of Boeser.
Firstly, he is not a "pure sniper", he has underrated playmaking abilities. This was on full display last year when Pettersson was out, and has always been on display when working with other high profile players.
I also don't consider him to be widely inconsistent either, what exactly do you base that on? Aside from this season, which as you said has turned around with a new coach, Boeser has posted nearly the same PPG in all seasons. His GPG has fluctuated a bit, but that's normal for a goal scorer, and the fluctuation has been marginal at worst. And, when I look at his PPG month or month last season and the season before, I do not see much of a differential. I will admit he's had seasons where he has looked better than others. His rookie season and last season were definitely his best, but I don't think there's enough there to label him as inconsistent.
Also, I really haven't minded his defensive play as of late. He certainly isn't lazy in that regard, but he does have limitations due to his skating and general offensive nature.
