Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 32,215
- 25,673
Canes GM confirms he had no clue whether Rantanen would sign with them or not. At the time of the trade he told them he only wanted Colorado
Brind'Amour throws Tulsky under the bus for the Rantanen situation: "And the question is, should we have known that before we attempted to sign him?"
- Thread starter Michoulicious
- Start date
Voight
#winning
Thats why hiring the math whiz/analytics guy isn't usually the right move. Chayka sucked and tried to cheat the system. Dubai hasn't been very good. Tulsky not looking too great these days.
Still sticking by this narrative?
I don't represent the entirety of the Montreal fanbase.
As far as the rube comment, I'm going to let Tulsky's own words demonstrate that.
well, nothing more salty than a Habs fan re: Canes management and team.
FWIW: I'll take Tulsky's work in his years at the Canes versus Bergeron's and the current cast of characters running your show today.
So they went with the trade anyways knowing all that.
Carolina's management is the responsible party here. They are the only reason they were in that situation at the deadline.
Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 25,524
- 17,099
Not as the boss for sure. But as a loud voice in the modern nhl it’s a must to have strong analytics department. The GM, who makes the final decision though, should be a smart hockey person first.
Who on the current Canes’ core did Tulsky bring in? Jarvis?
Well, first of all, it was Bergevin, not Bergeron. Secondly, you will find no bigger hater than I when it comes to Bergevin, as he set the Habs back ten years.
Overall though, that just shows the type of thinking you have and your inability to criticize moves your own team makes and to be able to see them for what they are. You do you though.
- Oct 31, 2007
- 42,279
- 53,182
Without being in the room, no one can give you a clear answer. Tulsky worked in the analytics department in 2015, ran that department in 2017, became the VP of hockey management in 2018, the assistant GM in 2021, and now the GM. It's long been known that the team picked his brain for drafts/free agents/etc during his entire career here. So the answer may be as many as "all of them"?
Mr Positive
Cap Crunch Incoming
- Nov 20, 2013
- 39,254
- 20,375
Seems like he could have meant he was criticizing MacFarland for trading Rantanen to Carolina without telling Tulsky about Rantanen's chances at re signing. I recall the rumors were just that the Avs didn't want to spend the money, so of course Carolina figured they might keep him if money was the only hang up.
Tulsky would not have been allowed to contact Rantanen or his agent before the trade.
Tulsky would not have been allowed to contact Rantanen or his agent before the trade.
Last edited:
starsfan86
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2006
- 5,844
- 4,324
SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 16,207
- 15,832
At least victims who bought Rantanen jerseys are being offered free upgrades
Finlandia WOAT
No blocks, No slappers
- May 23, 2010
- 24,779
- 25,948
brentashton
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2018
- 16,852
- 24,677
McFlyingV
Registered User
Honestly does it really matter? Carolina flipped him for more than they probably would have got if they flipped Necas.
WhataKnight
The KnightMan Cometh!
- Jan 6, 2023
- 1,145
- 1,258
That’s classy.
I can’t speak against anything that any team has done here.
The Avs got what they could for a guy they couldn’t sign within a comfortable timeframe. So did the Canes - with some nice assets. And Dallas got a guy they know is talented with the signature.
All three teams did pretty good here considering Rantanen's "commitment issues."
Despite any perceived miscommunication, Tulsky did his job (even though no one can tell me they didn't try prying Wyatt Johnston from the Stars, taking a boatload of picks when Dallas said nope.)
I would actually be all on that.
#17 was a boss.
A few posts above, Tulsky admits they talked to Rantanens agent and their focus was to be work out a deal with Colorado. Tulsky made the deal anyhow. It's not unusual for Teams to give permission to other teams to make deals with their players. It happens.
- Nov 12, 2021
- 11,050
- 9,852
serp
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2016
- 21,187
- 13,139
It's just a completely different type of package. What they ended up with is pretty much a rebuilding package . Rantanen was a win-now move and they had to switch that up.
McFlyingV
Registered User
I mean, yes, but value wise there's no chance that Necas was returning 2 1st, 2 3rds, and a young forward with top 6 upside. I think the Canes made out just fine with the swap, especially from a value perspective.
serp
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2016
- 21,187
- 13,139
Would also have to include Jack Drury a Canes 2025 2nd , Canes 2025 3rd and 2026 4th in that and they took on the cap dump that is Taylor Hall now.
McFlyingV
Registered User
Sure, so they weren't getting 2 1sts, 2 3rds and Stankoven for Necas, Drury, a 2nd+3rd+4th while taking on an expiring cap dump.
They got good value out of the deal at the end of the day.
serp
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2016
- 21,187
- 13,139
I think in the end all 3 teams got value but not sure Avs make the first deal if they know Rantanen ends up back in the division a few weeks later and on a longterm deal thats not even an overpay just kind of around the same what the Avs were offering themselves.
dirtydanglez
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2022
- 6,074
- 6,315
I don't fully understand Rantanen's opposition to playing for Carolina.
A good team with good coaching, future looks good, and could have helped them finally win the cup again which would have been a nice legacy.
A good team with good coaching, future looks good, and could have helped them finally win the cup again which would have been a nice legacy.
Whoot Whoot
Biased Rangers Fan
Latest posts
-
Devils discussion (news, notes and speculation) - part V- Latest: WhiskeyYerTheDevils
-
-
