And isn't an achievement of Nylander, either. You can't just throw out the 2015-2016 season just because it doesn't fit your narrative.
The 2015-2016 season is a season, but Nyander’s that year, consisted of 22 games. By season I mean a reasonable, plainly understood definition of 82 games or thereabouts.
Nylander splitting time between the AHL and the NHL doesn’t derail the narrative that the season after was Nylander’s first ful season of NHL hockey yielded 61 points. The very same number again the next year.
Do you think Nylander’s AHL numbers detract from the assertion that Nylander is an extremely valuable player ? I think it solidifies it. It confirms appropriate expectations going forward that it’s reasonable to plot an upward trajectory.
I think noting 22 games as something significant attempts to aid a narrative that cheapens Nylander’s pace...as a 19 year old. Remember, those back to back 61 point seasons are by Nylander at age 20 and 21.
Pray tell...What in my “narrative” is compromised by excluding a quarter of a season as though it were a season with respect to the sum of Nylander’s progress and production?