I really hope that Haley is on this team next season. NYR really needs that "Prustifyer", a guy who is a sparkplug fighter that will drop the gloves with anyone and can play well at that.
I hope Mash is that guy.
I really hope that Haley is on this team next season. NYR really needs that "Prustifyer", a guy who is a sparkplug fighter that will drop the gloves with anyone and can play well at that.
I hope Mash is that guy.
As I have said, I can see our bottom six being completely different next season. Wouldn't be shocked either if its a "youth movement."
We have too many redundant players. (hagelin, miller, zucc) are all speed but are small and offer not much else, though at least Hagelin does good on the forecheck. if we're gonna keep Zucc on top of the other 2, we need to bring in some tough guys to balance it out (clowe? he might take a discount, Bickell, horton, people like that). simply put, we need to get tougher to play against and add more skill.
Dunno why he would, though. There isn't a franchise player rule in the NHL. Henrik is the team, and knows it. He knows Sather would be nuts to let him go. You can bet his agent knows this, too. Baltimore had to give Flacco an outrageous contract because the GM knew how the fanbase would react to not re-signing a guy who had just won the Super Bowl.
It's not ideal for the cap, but NYR paying Henrik 7 million per is not unfair. Look how hard it is for other NHL teams to land quality goaltending. Philly and the disaster that was Bryzgalov. Ect.
And Zucc isn't exactly fast.
I feel that he is, but more for the Pack. Not NYR.I hope Mash is that guy.
This. A youth movement would be a good idea if it were for guys like Hrivik, Lindberg, Fast, Miller and would need a vet or two. Asham is easily replaceable, however.This is good if it's just players like Hrivik, Lindberg and maybe Miller. Bad if our entire bottom 6 is going to be all prospects. Need some veteram leadership down there. I liked Asham and want him back, but who knows if that'll happen.
We need a few bruisers on this team. Bickell would be a good addition.We have too many redundant players. (hagelin, miller, zucc) are all speed but are small and offer not much else, though at least Hagelin does good on the forecheck. if we're gonna keep Zucc on top of the other 2, we need to bring in some tough guys to balance it out (clowe? he might take a discount, Bickell, horton, people like that). simply put, we need to get tougher to play against and add more skill.
Neither McDonagh or Stepan will be UFAs next summer.How can the Rangers keep Richards with Lundqvist, McD and someone else I think Stepan due to be unrestricted free agents?
Lundqvist does deserve whatever he gets paid...He carries the emotion on his sleeves and it pisses me off when he get bad losses.
Guts of this organization there, we need to help him out
Can somebody please tell Nash what good means? What's really frightening is Nash is serious.
This comment to me is worse than Drury saying that a loss before the Christmas break wouldn't ruin his Christmas. If Nash thinks 1 goal in 12 games in the playoffs is good what the hell is bad? What's 2 goals to Nash? A fantastic playoff run.
I like Nash but this is complete garbage....
Haha what a ****ing joke.
1 goal in 12 games
I played good.
****ing lol.
same difference, they are both fast and small. Team is too easy to play against. but wrong thread for this.
Haha what a ****ing joke.
1 goal in 12 games
I played good.
****ing lol.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzOn top of that he seemed like he didn't care. Careless plays that led to coughing up the puck too many times.
nash didnt score at a gpg pace. TRADE HIM!!!!!!
Sample size is of course tiny. Also his shooting percentage was 2.4%. But of course those analytical principles are ignored by Kershaw when it comes to Nash...In fairness he didn't score at a goal per 10 game pace. But obviously he's not being traded regardless at this point.
Exactly. Hank's hometown discount is, "I'll stay in New York if you pay me."
In fairness he didn't score at a goal per 10 game pace. But obviously he's not being traded regardless at this point.
Sample size is of course tiny. Also his shooting percentage was 2.4%. But of course those analytical principles are ignored by Kershaw when it comes to Nash...
obviously not, but he scares me on how lazy he is. Better rebound.