DarrenBanks56
Registered User
- May 16, 2005
- 12,591
- 8,690
same.Yep, I would rather have Peeke and a legit 2nd line winger than have Carlo and no legit 2nd line winger.
carlo is so overrated around here.
same.Yep, I would rather have Peeke and a legit 2nd line winger than have Carlo and no legit 2nd line winger.
If he's so overrated, how are you getting a second line winger for him?same.
carlo is so overrated around here.
Which also limits his 5v5 time, when you are killing penalties and not receiving power play time.PP goals against do not count as a minus, so +/- says nothing about penalty kill performance.
youre not. Id trade him for sure though. Shouldve been done after 2019.If he's so overrated, how are you getting a second line winger for him?
Oh really? Where are you getting a right handed D who can handle his deployment for less than $4.125?youre not. Id trade him for sure though. Shouldve been done after 2019.
Hes been making the same critical mistakes year after year.
We could free up cap money with him out.
He hasn’t started out very well and last year was a down year for him, but I think he’ll turn his game around as the team picks up its play. He’s a valuable player on this team on a fine contract and still in his prime years, I don’t agree with his detractors.
The guy is severely overrated. He is not 4.1 mil dollar defenseman. come on.This year, there's only one Defenseman who has played 100 minutes who has a lower percentage of Offensive Zone starts than Carlo. Benoit for Toronto is at 9.5%, Carlo is at 18.5%. Tyler Myers is third at 23.5%.
Last year, of defensemen who played 1000 minutes, Carlo was dead last with 18%. Second worst was Kyle Burroughs at 23.3%. Guy just gets put in the most brutal deployment possible and yet some people just dont' even factor that in whatsoever. And despite that deployment, the Bruins had a 59% Goals For percentage against a 46% xGF%. So he vastly outperformed in that role.
Oh really? Where are you getting a right handed D who can handle his deployment for less than $4.125?
youre not. Id trade him for sure though. Shouldve been done after 2019.
Hes been making the same critical mistakes year after year.
We could free up cap money with him out.
Carlo hasn’t played well at all this year but neither have any of the other defensemen. It’s been a collective issue so far.But his play has slipped to Bad Carlo, so far. Why. He's shown the same range of poor play in the past. Unless he's playing through something, or just a on again off again headcase, confidence wise, he should not be making the same positional mistakes from previous seasons, anymore.
He's a maddening player, because he so good when he is on.
Michael KesselringThis year, there's only one Defenseman who has played 100 minutes who has a lower percentage of Offensive Zone starts than Carlo. Benoit for Toronto is at 9.5%, Carlo is at 18.5%. Tyler Myers is third at 23.5%.
Last year, of defensemen who played 1000 minutes, Carlo was dead last with 18%. Second worst was Kyle Burroughs at 23.3%. Guy just gets put in the most brutal deployment possible and yet some people just dont' even factor that in whatsoever. And despite that deployment, the Bruins had a 59% Goals For percentage against a 46% xGF%. So he vastly outperformed in that role.
Oh really? Where are you getting a right handed D who can handle his deployment for less than $4.125?
Well said, I want these posters to name better d-men with a comparable contract.Carlo hasn’t played well at all this year but neither have any of the other defensemen. It’s been a collective issue so far.
I disagree that he is some sort of in again off again head case - strongly disagree. Hes been incredibly dependable during his entire career.
He’s a +125 for his career despite a career offensive zone start percentage of 35%. Never had a negative season. He is a career 52% xGF despite that deployment.
And this is for $4.1M for a right handed defenseman.
If Carlo was offered up to the market 31 teams would be after him.
Which also limits his 5v5 time, when you are killing penalties and not receiving power play time.
I mean...he's on an RFA deal.Michael Kesselring
add in there aren't many good to very good 2nd pair RHD periodGood luck with that. Carlo is the 85th highest paid defenseman in the league. Add in all the ELC/bridge defenseman and he’s on a very very good deal.
I consider Carlo a 3rd D pairing.add in there aren't many good to very good 2nd pair RHD period
Oh please, you asked where you could get a RHD that could be deployed defensively and makes less. You didn't qualify with RFA status. If you are going to say at Carlo's rate why even bother ****ing asking the question.I mean...he's on an RFA deal.
Last year, he had 52% OZ starts. This year he's at 44%.
Not sure how that's a comp at all.
He will use his size in front of the net 1/10 games.Carlo is the least effective big defenseman in the nhl. He never learned how to use his body to his advantage and was never really a skilled defenseman to begin with. He’s a liability every time he takes a shift. Horrible instincts, no fire, no ball’s, he’s trade bait to a Canadian gm .
As opposed to the non-Canadian Don Sweeney?he’s trade bait to a Canadian gm .
Kesselring didn’t even PK last year. He is a bit this year but there’s nothing about him that indicates he could do well when completely buried, regardless of who his father is.Oh please, you asked where you could get a RHD that could be deployed defensively and makes less. You didn't qualify with RFA status. If you are going to say at Carlo's rate why even bother ****ing asking the question.
Kesselring is a ex D1 players kid who at 6:04, I'm pretty sure could play a more D oriented role if tasked, with someone like Lindholm on his pair.
You asked and I answered and you immediately went into goalpost shifting mode.
But hey, I guess that's um ok.
You’re still evaluating players based on plus / minus. That stat was proven years ago to be a poor indicator of an individual’s on ice contributions.Carlo led the team in plus/minus last season with a +23.
He was 2nd in the playoffs with a +4.
You’re still evaluating players based on plus / minus. That stat was proven years ago to be a poor indicator of an individual’s on ice contributions.
I was going by eye test / memory from watching the games. Looked to me like he struggled last year.
If you want to base your argument on stats, Corsi is a much better statistical indicator than plus / minus and Carlo’s Corsi rating was way down last year from his career track record and continues to be near that low so far this season.
I am a big fan of the guy and am optimistic that he’ll revert to his very valuable game soon.
Get a similar type other team fan base doesn’t likeIf he's so overrated, how are you getting a second line winger for him?
You're certainly entitled to your opinion as am I. His biggest problem through out his career has been consistency. I like the player at his best, but he goes through personal periods of bad decisions. Not just when the D has been collectively subpar.Carlo hasn’t played well at all this year but neither have any of the other defensemen. It’s been a collective issue so far.
I disagree that he is some sort of in again off again head case - strongly disagree. Hes been incredibly dependable during his entire career.
He’s a +125 for his career despite a career offensive zone start percentage of 35%. Never had a negative season. He is a career 52% xGF despite that deployment.
And this is for $4.1M for a right handed defenseman.
If Carlo was offered up to the market 31 teams would be after him.