That would be a good unintended benefit if true. I think the Rumble and Money in the Bank matches should be the only time they mix. Twice a year is a sufficient amount of mixing the promotions but I really hope they don't do the yearly draft gig again. It waters it down. It should be rare that a talent moves over and I would've made it that it can only happen when the main title holder lost and had to choose where to go to. Not a fan of trades or annual drafts unless there is a crop of talent coming in from the outside.
Smackdown going live with its own roster and writing team?
This has my attention.
The writing teams honestly have never really been a problem because they've never been in a position to become the problem. Vince is final say and until that changes, the meaning behind the writers only goes so far.
I like the drafts personally.
It's an exciting premise. Add in the prospect of that being a day where NXT talent can be called up, and it can be much better than in the past.
If it's new talent coming in from the outside, I can get behind the draft concept but if it's just a day to move talent around from Raw to Smackdown and vice-versa, I don't like that at all. If they want to do trades every so often or make a match every so often that allows a program to pick a talent to take, that's fine. It just shouldn't be THAT much and it shouldn't be a yearly mix-up of talent exchanges.
Well ideally it can be a bit of both. NXT call-ups, outside talent debuting, and then switches between brands.
The writing teams honestly have never really been a problem because they've never been in a position to become the problem. Vince is final say and until that changes, the meaning behind the writers only goes so far.
Weirdly enough, rumors were flying that WWE commissioned a new world title a couple months ago. Here is a supposed pic of that new belt.
Weirdly enough, rumors were flying that WWE commissioned a new world title a couple months ago. Here is a supposed pic of that new belt.
I'm quite sure that belt was confirmed fake when it made the rounds before. But I guess we'll see.Weirdly enough, rumors were flying that WWE commissioned a new world title a couple months ago. Here is a supposed pic of that new belt.
Is it just me or is there alot of revisionist thinking going on?
If I remember correctly, the vast majority hated the brand split orginally and couldn't wait to see them unified again.
Sure, you can argue that there is more talent to go around this time, but I don't think this will change the perception of raw being the premier product.
If both brands had nearly the same equity, then it would be a great idea, but I still think smackdown will only serve a certain niche, while raw attempts to serve its entire range of audience.
Before attempting this, they should have focused much more on building that SD brand, to make it feel more like RAW's equivalent, rather than RAW's little brother.
if raw stays at 3hrs, smackdown will always be their little brother. five hrs of content in two days is a lot.
Cena will probably put guys over though. And he might run with the mid card belt anyways. Think what NJPW did with Nakamura when he was their IC champ equivalent.
I don't know how anyone could not be intrigued by this, considering how crap WWE has been for the last few years. It's new, it's fresh, why not?
Also, love that the other world title is coming back.