What Treliving and Berube are doing is building a lineup with depth, balance, and flexibility. This lineup will inevitably fuel the culture of accountability and competition.
Having a strong fourth line is critical in achieving the type of lineup described above. In a perfect world we go into each game planning to play each of the four lines 15 minutes that night. Of course, it won't end up this way, a couple lines might be clicking, tilting the ice, and getting the chances. These lines will get more ice time that night.
It's interesting how this lineup looks if Domi ends up centering Nylander, this forces three lines featuring the Core 4 and that should be the goal here.
Knies Matthews Marner
Holmberg Domi Nylander
Pacioretty Tavares Robertson
Lorentz Kampf McMann
Dewar and hopefully Minten can factor into that fourth line and allow us to move on from Kampf without sacrificing our depth.
It's the same with the D. How long is it Benoit and Timmins as the third pair? Does Liljegren draw in for Timmins? Does Myers? Hakanpaa is eligible to return in eight more games. Do we have too many bottom pairing RD all of a sudden? Can we reunite McCabe and Benoit? McCabe and Myers? Can Liljegren, Myers, or eventually Hakanpaa go with OEL? OEL and McCabe is working well right now and I don't want to break it up but can each of them carry an effective pairing?
Reilly Tanev
OEL Liljegren/Hakanpaa
McCabe Benoit/Myers/Hakanpaa
Same as with the forwards, give the pairs that are playing better more ice time. Competition and drive to be better.
I think our goaltending is shaping up the same way. We have three, maybe four guys that could win NHL hockey games and no clear number one all of a sudden. Competition and not controversy.
Management worked pretty hard with PTOs, SOIR, LTIR, holding firm on Robertson, and well played waivers to give us more depth than we have ever had in this era.
I think Treliving is doing a good job and I wasn't always sure I felt that way.