horner
Registered User
- May 22, 2007
- 8,815
- 5,200
We traded for him Apr 11 2021No he wasn't that happened after.
Taken from capfriendly
April 10 2021
Upper body injury day to day
April 22 20221
I remember people on here bitchy about that
We traded for him Apr 11 2021No he wasn't that happened after.
Even if one were to believe that it was an actual "injury" (that magically appeared after a game he played the entirety of, that nothing happened in) and not the usual trade-related sitting for a high-value rental before the deadline, it would still be irrelevant, because he had multiple weeks to heal from this supposed "day to day" injury while in mandatory quarantine anyway. We know he was healthy for his first game with us on April 22nd, and we know that the injury that actually impacted his effectiveness while here happened on May 3rd and was brand new and had absolutely nothing to do with any bumps and bruises he may have had prior.We traded for him Apr 11 2021
Taken from capfriendly
April 10 2021
Upper body injury day to day
Even if one were to believe that it was an actual "injury" (that magically appeared after a game he played the entirety of, that nothing happened in) and not the usual trade-related sitting for a high-value rental before the deadline, it would still be irrelevant, because he had multiple weeks to heal from this supposed "day to day" injury while in mandatory quarantine anyway. We know he was healthy for his first game with us on April 22nd, and we know that the injury that actually impacted his effectiveness while here happened on May 3rd and was brand new and had absolutely nothing to do with any bumps and bruises he may have had prior.
That is 100% false. There was no back injury reported. He got sat for the one game before the deadline after nothing happened, and Foligno explicitly confirmed that the debilitating injury he experienced with us was brand new and nothing he'd ever gone through before. I don't know where you got that injury report, but aside from showing that he was healthy when he joined us, it's wrong right off the bat. Foligno didn't "miss six straight games with an upper body injury". He was sat for the one game before the deadline to protect his trade return, and the only reasn he missed more after the trade was because he went into the mandatory Covid quarantine.It was widely publicized and very well known that Foligno hurt his back BEFORE Kyle Dumbass got ripped off trading for him.
That is 100% false. There was no back injury reported. He got sat for the one game before the deadline after nothing happened, and Foligno explicitly confirmed that the debilitating injury he experienced with us was brand new and nothing he'd ever gone through before. I don't know where you got that injury report, but aside from showing that he was healthy when he joined us, it's wrong right off the bat. Foligno didn't "miss six straight games with an upper body injury". He was sat for the one game before the deadline to protect his trade return, and the only reasn he missed more after the trade was because he went into the mandatory Covid quarantine.
Looks like he's going to achieve the same results as Kyle, without being a complete twat who lacks integrity. So that's a bonus.
Misinformation= stone cold fact.It was widely publicized and very well known that Foligno hurt his back BEFORE Kyle Dumbass got ripped off trading for him.
Just one of the many brutal mistakes by Dumbass.
View attachment 842042View attachment 842043
Not a fan of either side, but isn’t another possibility - both are important.Exactly.
Physical play is ALWAYS what wins in the playoffs. This is the NHL - - not women’s hockey.
Only a clueless gimp like Kyle Dumbass would consider body checks to be irrelevant and focus on some worthless stat like “expected high danger chances”.
What a difference it makes to have a professional GM like Treliving instead of a useless intern from Brock University.
Not a fan of either side, but isn’t another possibility - both are important.
Bit of a strange take. Most of his moves have been solid, the only one that was truly a bust was Klingberg and even then it was a one year deal that got buried on LTIR anyways.He's terrible. But at least he's got some unskilled crap to hit for you guys.
It sounds like you just don't understand the point of these advanced stats. I'm not even one to post advanced stats but I at least have somewhat an understanding as to why they're used and think it's ignorant to just downright dismiss them.Any “expected” stat is irrelevant - - it either happened or it didn’t happen. There’s no such thing as “should have happened” or “really expected it to happen” when it comes to statistical analysis.
Saw this on twitter and found it absolutely hilarious and satisfying
Ryan Reaves has passed Denis Malgin on the Leafs all time points scoring list.
Ryan Reaves: 3 goals, 2 assists
Denis Malgin: 2 goals, 2 assists
This really sums up how hopelessly incompetent Kyle Dumbass truly is.
Almost as brutal as letting Zach Hyman leave fir $5.5M because Dumbass wanted to give Pete Mrazek $3.8M and Nick Ritchie $2.5M.
Dumbass is the worst GM in NHL history.
you guys arguing about ancient history absent a confession, one man's sin is every man's suffering.Looks like he's going to achieve the same results as Kyle, without being a complete twat who lacks integrity. So that's a bonus.
It sounds like you just don't understand the point of these advanced stats. I'm not even one to post advanced stats but I at least have somewhat an understanding as to why they're used and think it's ignorant to just downright dismiss them.
They are just extra tools to help evaluate players and can even help make a decision between 2 similar players as to who might have more benefits.
When talking about expected stats when it comes to goalies for example. If they show that a particular goalie on a bad team is making saves from high danger spots that a goalie who plays on a good team isnt, it is extra information that teams can use to evaluate when deciding who they might go with in UFA in addition to just going by sv%, as well as using the eye test. They might help show that the goalie who has a higher sv% on a good team might just have his sv% inflated by being behind better players and structure. Like Jonathan Quick for example. Had an .876sv% on LA and then goes to a better team in Vegas and puts up a .901sv%. His numbers were propped up by a better team but he was still the same goalie.
They can't though. That's the actual problem with them. They try to tell people that Benoit and Edmundson aren't NHL defenders, yet Timmins and Holl are, and Gardiner and Franson are incredible.It sounds like you just don't understand the point of these advanced stats. I'm not even one to post advanced stats but I at least have somewhat an understanding as to why they're used and think it's ignorant to just downright dismiss them.
They are just extra tools to help evaluate players and can even help make a decision between 2 similar players as to who might have more benefits.
When talking about expected stats when it comes to goalies for example. If they show that a particular goalie on a bad team is making saves from high danger spots that a goalie who plays on a good team isnt, it is extra information that teams can use to evaluate when deciding who they might go with in UFA in addition to just going by sv%, as well as using the eye test. They might help show that the goalie who has a higher sv% on a good team might just have his sv% inflated by being behind better players and structure. Like Jonathan Quick for example. Had an .876sv% on LA and then goes to a better team in Vegas and puts up a .901sv%. His numbers were propped up by a better team but he was still the same goalie.
Look who you are responding to. The answer to your question lies there….View attachment 843129
NHL Odds & Betting Lines
Explore the best NHL odds from multiple top online sportsbooks for all upcoming hockey games and start betting on your favorite teams today.www.oddstrader.com
View attachment 843130
![]()
Can you move off this point already, it's been proven a few times that we traded for an injured Nick Foligno already.
They can't though. That's the actual problem with them. They try to tell people that Benoit and Edmundson aren't NHL defenders, yet Timmins and Holl are, and Gardiner and Franson are incredible.
Yet if you are able to understand the slightest modicum about sport, you can see that it is blatantly false.
Then, because you are able to understand the slightest modicum about sport, you get told your eyes and brain is biased, and you simply have it in for Timmins, Holl, Gardiner, Franson, people who wear glasses, people who wear cardigans, and people who are 5 months younger than you.
Again, I'm not one to put full stock into advanced stats and don't think they are the be all, end all.They can't though. That's the actual problem with them. They try to tell people that Benoit and Edmundson aren't NHL defenders, yet Timmins and Holl are, and Gardiner and Franson are incredible.
Yet if you are able to understand the slightest modicum about sport, you can see that it is blatantly false.
Then, because you are able to understand the slightest modicum about sport, you get told your eyes and brain is biased, and you simply have it in for Timmins, Holl, Gardiner, Franson, people who wear glasses, people who wear cardigans, and people who are 5 months younger than you.