Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
Says the guy who thinks bringing Kessel back is a good idea………
I think it would be a fun idea more so than a good one..
Have you honestly liked most of Tres moves so far?
Says the guy who thinks bringing Kessel back is a good idea………
I think he's pretty handcuffed next offseason as well. It's going to be difficult to turn this team around until the following year. He'll get lambasted throughout the journey though. I'm only suspect of Tre because he took the job in the first place, a catch 22 of sorts.Tre did well in taking a risk adverse approach with most of his signings and decisions this offseason (the Reaves one stands out as particularly poor though given you can count the number of good games he's played on one hand and his signed for 2.5, .more seasons).
But he will need to stand on his own merits by the end of next offseason.
No more contextualizing questionable signings and moves (which is basically the majority of 'positive' posts in this thread have focused on), we need to start seeing outright good decisions being made that lead to tangible net positive results. Tre is being paid an awful lot of money to do better than just tread water.
If they extend Domi, then Kampf needs to get the boot or he needs to learn how to play better hockey again
I think he's pretty handcuffed next offseason as well. It's going to be difficult to turn this team around until the following year. He'll get lambasted throughout the journey though. I'm only suspect of Tre because he took the job in the first place, a catch 22 of sorts.
I think he's pretty handcuffed next offseason as well. It's going to be difficult to turn this team around until the following year. He'll get lambasted throughout the journey though. I'm only suspect of Tre because he took the job in the first place, a catch 22 of sorts.
Agree with your first sentence, don't know what to make of the rest.None of the contract structure was a mystery to him when he took the job, not having coherent answers for how to navigate those challenges is not a remotely acceptable position. If he doesn’t know what to do, what the hell did they ask him about in the interview? How’s Jim, what weekends are you coming up to the cottage this year?
No one could have seen that point drop off but no matter how you look at it, signing a player to a 10.5 AAV til he's 38 was always going to be seen as a bad deal. The Flames are now married to that contract for the rest of his term. No one will ever trade for that unless they get double retention.He’s pacing for 65 points this season. The multiple exaggerations in your post tell me you’re not to be reasoned with.
And yes it’s not his fault that Huberdeau literally had the biggest point falloff of any player EVER. He was literally pushing McD for the Ross until the final week of the season.
Agree with your first sentence, don't know what to make of the rest.
I dont know if he has a good plan to navigate the challenges or not - so far decent. Alls I'm saying is if he does, it seems most people won't realize that until the year after next. My expectations aren't Scotty Bo or Lombardi here, his pedigree is more run of the mill.
Hard not to be optimistic - at least we have a shot, however challenged now, at the second half of the era. Might as well salvage what little hope remains and get pumped up.
that is f***ing crazyNo one’s asking for Scotty lol, there’s a light year gap from Scotty to a guy who apparently needs 2+ calendar years to assess and make any meaningful impact. Take a rookie Zito, his first year he got Reinhart and Bennet, his second year he bent over Tre for Tkachuk. That’s with a 10mil backup goalie (at the time), UFA negotiations with Barkov, Verhaeghe, Reinhart, Montour, Bennett, etc and 6mil in dead buyout cap.
The idea that we’re paying a guy millions a year to be GM and the expectation is that he’s going to tinker around the edges with low risk UFA adds for 2 years in the middle of the core’s prime years is crazy.
We just have different perceptions of the state of team when Tre took over, so our expectations aren't aligned.No one’s asking for Scotty lol, there’s a light year gap from Scotty to a guy who apparently needs 2+ calendar years to assess and make any meaningful impact. Take a rookie Zito, his first year he got Reinhart and Bennet, his second year he bent over Tre for Tkachuk. That’s with a 10mil backup goalie (at the time), UFA negotiations with Barkov, Verhaeghe, Reinhart, Montour, Bennett, etc and 6mil in dead buyout cap.
The idea that we’re paying a guy millions a year to be GM and the expectation is that he’s going to tinker around the edges with low risk UFA adds for 2 years in the middle of the core’s prime years is crazy.
I am of the same mind. Kyle seemed to have been that way at the end as well. Explains why he traded for 25% of a roster last winter. Didn't help that most were rentals.We just have different perceptions of the state of team when Tre took over, so our expectations aren't aligned.
Despite our 1 in 100,000 odds of failure or whatever it was, my journey was expecting it in slow motion. Then watching Tre take over this badly damaged team right when it was handicapped to the gills in contract clauses and pay structures.
Trying to overcome this position in three months, or twelve, is not a realistic expectation to me. I think we were much more broken then you do, and just hoping we are set up for a few years as a strong contender post 11M JT. Any earlier success is over achieving.
Florida's GM has been smoking ours yes, but that includes your boy Dubas, so calm down a bit over there and give the new guy a bit more time to do something before we write him off.No one’s asking for Scotty lol, there’s a light year gap from Scotty to a guy who apparently needs 2+ calendar years to assess and make any meaningful impact. Take a rookie Zito, his first year he got Reinhart and Bennet, his second year he bent over Tre for Tkachuk. That’s with a 10mil backup goalie (at the time), UFA negotiations with Barkov, Verhaeghe, Reinhart, Montour, Bennett, etc and 6mil in dead buyout cap.
The idea that we’re paying a guy millions a year to be GM and the expectation is that he’s going to tinker around the edges with low risk UFA adds for 2 years in the middle of the core’s prime years is crazy.
Reaves is front runner for the Hart trophy if the season started last gameThe day treliving signed was the first day of regression for this team.
Can't really fault him for bertuzzi, domi, kllingberg - but that reaves contract was awful from the start and this Nylander one isn't much better.
Florida's GM has been smoking ours yes, but that includes your boy Dubas, so calm down a bit over there and give the new guy a bit more time to do something before we write him off.
No. Murray, Benoit, and Lagesson were good moves. Bert and Domi I’d say the jury is still out on. Klingburg got injured so as much as I didn’t want that type of D man many here wanted a offensive D man. Gregor is a meh move imo. His real boner was Reeves, and the term he gave him, that and the Keefe extension which was on another level of stupid. And last but not least the Nylander contract, meet the new boss, same as the old boss……..I think it would be a fun idea more so than a good one..
Have you honestly liked most of Tres moves so far?
Calgary won't gift Tanev to Tre. Tre will have to overpay or Conroy will move him elsewhere IMO. Just sign him as a UFA July 1st after Brodie comes off the books. Pretty ironic that the old GM signed Brodie over Tanev and 4+ years later, Brodie is falling off a cliff and we think Tanev who is up there is age, is part of the solution.Now that Lindholm's been moved it's clear Calgary are sellers.
So I'm expecting any day now the Tanev-Toronto speculation will restart. I do hope Tre doesn't bite for the same reasons many others have already outlined - this is not the year to give up more of what little futures we have left, etc.
Calgary won't gift Tanev to Tre. Tre will have to overpay or Conroy will move him elsewhere IMO. Just sign him as a UFA July 1st after Brodie comes off the books. Pretty ironic that the old GM signed Brodie over Tanev and 4+ years later, Brodie is falling off a cliff and we think Tanev who is up there is age, is part of the solution.
Allvin is the GM of the Canucks, Rutherford is the President.I agree I think Conroy is going to want Tre to pay more than other GM's mostly because he does not want to look like he got schooled by his old boss and if the Vancouver deal is anything to expect... Conroy is probably asking for Matthews for TanevRutherford is such a shitty GM... he pays Ferrari prices for a Toyota Corolla.
I agree I think Conroy is going to want Tre to pay more than other GM's mostly because he does not want to look like he got schooled by his old boss and if the Vancouver deal is anything to expect... Conroy is probably asking for Matthews for TanevRutherford is such a shitty GM... he pays Ferrari prices for a Toyota Corolla.
I'd consider Marner for Tanev. Matthews is too much. LOL.I agree I think Conroy is going to want Tre to pay more than other GM's mostly because he does not want to look like he got schooled by his old boss and if the Vancouver deal is anything to expect... Conroy is probably asking for Matthews for TanevRutherford is such a shitty GM... he pays Ferrari prices for a Toyota Corolla.
It is worth it, if that Corolla wins you the Cup. We paid Mercedes prices for Chryslers and broken down Fords and have nothing to show for them.Ferrari for Corolla pricing? He will fit right in.