Is his production really that bad relative to his peers?
In his D-1, for example, Lambert had .2 PPG in Liiga. Aatu Raty had .17. Jesse Ylonen and Roby Jarventie, the only other Finnish forward prospects I could find taken at the end of the first/beginning of the second in the last five years both weren't even playing in Liiga in their draft year. I also found this dude named Eetu Luostarinen who went mid-2nd in 2017 was at .22 in Liiga in his D-1.
Of course, guys like Lundell and Kemell handily outproduced him at the same age, but they also went much earlier in the draft. Seems to me Lambert's production is about in-line with where the Jets took him?
The Lambert pick was a swing-for-the-fences-type pick. We already used a first on a better forward prospect, the Lambert pick was just a bonus from the Rangers. I'm totally fine taking a shot on him. I'm curious, though, as to why you are so adamant on arguing how much this guy sucks?
You aren't going to get a world-class, flawless, franchise-altering prospect at #30. You're unlikely to even get a superstar. Very few of us are expecting that. We know we have a player with a ton of red flags, but also some good potential. Us Jets fans are hoping he can build off his elite skating and possibly turn into something but reading endless pages of "nuh uh, he won't be anything, he has no hockey sense!" is getting tiresome.