Lysell is barely above 1PPG in his D+1 OHL season.He said Connor Garland not Pavel Bure. Lysell is not being traded for the like of Connor Fing Garland, not even straight up.
Doesn’t come close to touching Garland without picks added.
Lysell is barely above 1PPG in his D+1 OHL season.He said Connor Garland not Pavel Bure. Lysell is not being traded for the like of Connor Fing Garland, not even straight up.
Both 25. Have you compared their respective career stats?Garland is a major upgrade over Debrusk anyone who thinks otherwise would have to be a homer.
Anyone who has watched both players knows the difference all Debrusk game is offense....Garland literally does everything out there.Both 25. Have you compared their respective career stats?
Yes he moves his legs fast and stops on a dime. He can also spray up to 7’. He occasionally tucks his jersey in on one side.Anyone who has watched both players knows the difference all Debrusk game is offense....Garland literally does everything out there.
So you think Charlie Is available? Your post was terribleAgain I assumed he’s untouchable, no way you’d make a dumb comment if he wasn’t available. So what is the ask? If you tell me he’s untouchable you just wasted my time and proved nothing as a point.
I get to see Debrusk all the time he's not even close to Garland he might be small but he plays like he's the biggest player on the ice similar to Tuch(though not expecting PPG from Garland) he's gonna thrive in a bigger role on any team.Yes he moves his legs fast and stops on a dime. He can also spray up to 7’. He occasionally tucks his jersey in on one side.
DeBrusk has scored more goals & points. Garland has averaged 4 more points than DeBrusk per 82 games played (albeit while averaging more TOI). But yes the Bruins would need to trade Lysell & a 1st for Garland meanwhile DeBrusk is worth a 3rd. Spare me
I get to see Debrusk all the time he's not even close to Garland he might be small but he plays like he's the biggest player on the ice similar to Tuch(though not expecting PPG from Garland) he's gonna thrive in a bigger role on any team.
OEL if he s a Bruins he s the second best D in this team, and by far...even if his offensive game is fading..OEL at 5.5-6mil is ok for meOEL does not move the needle in my opinion , sorry
Forget Lysell...a 1st and Debrusk for Horvat it s okHorvat + Pearson
Lysell + 1st + Debrusk
ty
You telling me he is in decline and at 31 with 5 more years after this year and and you want to pay 6 mil a year .........I don't think soOEL if he s a Bruins he s the second best D in this team, and by far...even if his offensive game is fading..OEL at 5.5-6mil is ok for me
I mean, there was a lot of hostility in this thread tho.I just find it hard to believe, even after all these years, that these two fan bases can talk rationally to each other .
If you read my post I said other than Charlie, in other words he’s obviously untouchable. I’m a Canucks fan and we have Miller, Pettersson, Boeser, Garland, Podkolzin, Hoglander, Pearson, Motte on the wings, we don’t need Pasta. We need to target a partner for Hughes and hence Charlie, who is untouchable. It’s not such a terrible take if you take this into context.So you Charlie Is available? Your post was terrible
HorvatI want Carlo and Carlo only
Lysell is barely above 1PPG in his D+1 OHL season.
Doesn’t come close to touching Garland without picks added.
Forget Lysell...a 1st and Debrusk for Horvat it s ok
DeBrusk is such an underwhelming player
If you look at the numbers he is not very good.I want Carlo and Carlo only
Nobody except a select few Bruins fans think Debrusk has any real value.
True but I’m a fan. Feel he’d be good with HughesIf you look at the numbers he is not very good.