Toggle sidebar

Post-Game Talk: BOS @ NYR | Still Alive

NYRANGERAMI said:
They have outplayed us. Only reason we didnt lose by more in those games was because of Lundy. When he had an off nite, we lost 5-2. But have no fear the series is just getting started...LGR!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

The only reason we didn't win any of those games is because of Rask, who has been pretty damn good in this series before tonight. He's been coming up with huge saves at the right moments all series so far.
 
Tawnos said:
I really disagree with that. I don't think the Rangers have looked particularly great, but the Bruins have outplayed us for 4 periods in 4 games. The third in game 2. The 2nd and 3rd in game 3, and the 1st in game 4. Game 1 was even throughout. The first period in game 2 was even. We outplayed them in the 2nd. The first in game 3 was even. The 2nd and 3rd in game 4 were even.

I just don't feel like the Bruins have outplayed us by much in this series.
Click to expand...


They annihilated us in 3 and OT in game 1 ESPECIALLY OT we didn't even hit the ice it was a joke.
 
HatTrick Swayze said:
Brassard had some just unbelievable moments out there.

Fingers really crossed he can keep it up. Would be huge for the franchise.

McD is also showing some flashes of being "a real true actual #1 dman" or whatever the HF definition is nowadays.

Thankful that we all got one more good night out of the deal.
Click to expand...

He was by far my favorite player before challenging Brad Douchand, while it wasn't that smart, was kinda awesome.

Tonight: 2A - 25:29 TOI - 64.71% FO

Playoffs: 11GP 2G 10A (4th) 12P (5th)
 
Tawnos said:
The only reason we didn't win any of those games is because of Rask, who has been pretty damn good in this series before tonight. He's been coming up with huge saves at the right moments all series so far.
Click to expand...

Nah...Rask hasnt been tested until tonight..and when he was tested he tripped over his own skates...lol..Rangers havent produced much offensively. But they will now...Full speed ahead!!!!!!!!!
 
HatTrick Swayze said:
Brassard had some just unbelievable moments out there.

Fingers really crossed he can keep it up. Would be huge for the franchise.

McD is also showing some flashes of being "a real true actual #1 dman" or whatever the HF definition is nowadays.

Thankful that we all got one more good night out of the deal.
Click to expand...

OT...but are you sure that's actually Stepan in your avatar? He is number 21...but that guy is left handed. Unless the picture is mirrored...or maybe you know that's not Stepan and that's not the point. :laugh:
 
shinchanyo said:
Jonathan is right both of the goals in that game were bad. he makes one of those and he doesn't have to make 15 godlike saves in OT. The best have to make 1 of those two saves in that game. The OT performance by the forwards was so atrocious that it takes the focus away from it. But two unscreened point shots beat him. one he kicks in himself. He had a poor game in that game which forced us into OT and cost us a win.
Click to expand...

And both of you are wrong, you are taking the focus away from where it should be, he allowed 2 goals and you want to crucify him. The offense played like crap and you are giving it a pass. Had a late PP to win it in regulation and it was dreadful as usual and you don't even mention it. Humm, i wonder why.
Like I said, you guys want to live in alternate reality? go right ahead.
 
Kreider has as many goals in 25 playoff games than super stud Devils star franchise Selke winner Jacob Josefson has in almost 100 games.

Josefson was stolen by Lou in the first round just a few picks after Kreider. I can't believe Sather passed on him.
 
Tawnos said:
Despite how bad and weak we were (which I agree with), 2 of the 3 losses were 1 goal affairs, even with Lundqvist allowing a softy in game 1. It wasn't like Boston was blowing us out every game.
Click to expand...

Not blowouts, but they have dominated. We barely had the puck for large parts of the series.
 
I think Boston is good enough to get along by doing just what they have to, and the odd time, they misjudge it and cut the line of margin too thin.

May they do it again.
 
LOL TORTS: "He's a great player who's having a helluva time. It's not about Brad, I'm not blaming him and you can kiss my ass if you wanna write something different."

Man he really sticks by his players

Torts: "Hagelin sucks"

Oh
 
shinchanyo said:
LOL TORTS: "He's a great player who's having a helluva time. It's not about Brad, I'm not blaming him and you can kiss my ass if you wanna write something different."

Man he really sticks by his players

Torts: "Hagelin sucks"

Oh
Click to expand...

You know that he said that Hagelin was a great player like 5 times in that press conference, right?
 
Kwayry said:
And both of you are wrong, you are taking the focus away from where it should be, he allowed 2 goals and you want to crucify him. The offense played like crap and you are giving it a pass. Had a late PP to win it in regulation and it was dreadful as usual and you don't even mention it. Humm, i wonder why.
Like I said, you guys want to live in alternate reality? go right ahead.
Click to expand...

I let in two goals on 4 shots. I still let in 2 goals right? Screw evaluating quality and objectively looking at the goals let's follow dem stats! 2.00 GAA!!!!

He was phenomenal game 1 in OT. But we should have never gotten there. Sometimes for the absolute best goalie in the world it's his job to hold a team to one goal and stop unscreened blueline shots.

Also you must have missed the times I said the exact opposite of "I pardon the offense for this joke of a performance in OT and period 3."

(Looks up a few posts on this very page of this very thread) ...oh

Also how clueless are you to say I'm crucifying Lundqvist and how absolutely ignorant are you to say I actually WANT to crucify Lundqvist. Jesus Christ white knight harder for the best goalie on earth b/c he gets criticized for legitimately screwing up
 
Last edited:
It's all part of Tort's plan...
step 1- bench the Richards.
step 2- win game 4 at home to get to a game 5.
step 3- Torts places the Richards into the lineup game 5 in a top 6 role. step 4- The Richards is motivated after the game 4 scratch and plays the game of his life in game 5.
step 5- Rangers head home down 3-2 in series, The Richards has **** to prove to the fans so he adds another career game.
step 6- Rangers march down to Boston and the Richards leads the team to victory in game 7.
Miracle on Broadway complete, Torts is a genius, and they make a Brad Richards statue outside of MSG. Yes Richards should play game 5
 
mrhockey193195 said:
OT...but are you sure that's actually Stepan in your avatar? He is number 21...but that guy is left handed. Unless the picture is mirrored...or maybe you know that's not Stepan and that's not the point. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Yea absolutely not Stepan. I started using it right before he took off in the WJCs and what can I say, I can be superstitious.
 
stasiewich said:
It's all part of Tort's plan...
step 1- bench the Richards.
step 2- win game 4 at home to get to a game 5.
step 3- Torts places the Richards into the lineup game 5 in a top 6 role. step 4- The Richards is motivated after the game 4 scratch and plays the game of his life in game 5.
step 5- Rangers head home down 3-2 in series, The Richards has **** to prove to the fans so he adds another career game.
step 6- Rangers march down to Boston and the Richards leads the team to victory in game 7.
Miracle on Broadway complete, Torts is a genius, and they make a Brad Richards statue outside of MSG. Yes Richards should play game 5
Click to expand...

Noooow we're cookin with gas!
 
shinchanyo said:
I let in two goals on 4 shots. I still let in 2 goals right? Screw evaluating quality and objectively looking at the goals let's follow dem stats! 2.00 GAA!!!!

He was phenomenal game 1 in OT. But we should have never gotten there. Sometimes for the absolute best goalie in the world it's his job to hold a team to one goal and stop unscreened blueline shots
Click to expand...


The game was tied early in the 3rd period, they had enough to time to score the 3rd goal. And he made some great saves to keep it tied at 2. He gave them a chance to win it. They had a PP late in regulation to win it and they failed. THAT's what cost us the game.
You can't twist facts.
 
Most important game is game 5. Rangers are in the mode of one game at a time. So looking back makes no sense, looking ahead makes no sense. But Boston they will come out stronger for game 5 than they will for game 7 if it gets that far. See they know that if they lose game 5 they go into mode of ....Oh **** were in trouble now...and they get uptight. While the Rangers are relaxed still playing one game at a time. LGR!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
stasiewich said:
It's all part of Tort's plan...
step 1- bench the Richards.
step 2- win game 4 at home to get to a game 5.
step 3- Torts places the Richards into the lineup game 5 in a top 6 role. step 4- The Richards is motivated after the game 4 scratch and plays the game of his life in game 5.
step 5- Rangers head home down 3-2 in series, The Richards has **** to prove to the fans so he adds another career game.
step 6- Rangers march down to Boston and the Richards leads the team to victory in game 7.
Miracle on Broadway complete, Torts is a genius, and they make a Brad Richards statue outside of MSG. Yes Richards should play game 5
Click to expand...

Love the step-by-step road to glory, except for Step 3. Leave Richards where he is most effective, off the ice.
 
Kwayry said:
The game was tied early in the 3rd period, they had enough to time to score the 3rd goal. And he made some great saves to keep it tied at 2. He gave them a chance to win it. They had a PP late in regulation to win it and they failed. THAT's what cost us the game.
You can't twist facts.
Click to expand...

My point: If he makes those saves we have the lead. Since he should have made those saves he gets blame.

Your point: He made great saves to keep it tied.

These are utterly independent points that do NOT conflict with one another. You can criticize him for his mistakes (which came first and cost us a win in regulation) while also recognizing that after he cost us a win in regulation he held the team in it and gave the team a chance to win it OT
 
stasiewich said:
It's all part of Tort's plan...
step 1- bench the Richards.
step 2- win game 4 at home to get to a game 5.
step 3- Torts places the Richards into the lineup game 5 in a top 6 role. step 4- The Richards is motivated after the game 4 scratch and plays the game of his life in game 5.
step 5- Rangers head home down 3-2 in series, The Richards has **** to prove to the fans so he adds another career game.
step 6- Rangers march down to Boston and the Richards leads the team to victory in game 7.
Miracle on Broadway complete, Torts is a genius, and they make a Brad Richards statue outside of MSG. Yes Richards should play game 5
Click to expand...

Or Ritchie with the game winner in game 7? :sarcasm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom