nbwingsfan
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2009
- 22,289
- 16,468
They got him for less than Swayman was asking…Bruins F'd around and found out.
An extra $250k is “finding out”…?
They got him for less than Swayman was asking…Bruins F'd around and found out.
All that drama for that little bit more pay?
Lollllll 8 years for a goalie. congrats bruins, you finally landed your first bad contract. You guys got away with not having one of those for too long.
They got him for less than Swayman was asking…
An extra $250k is “finding out”…?
Goalies and 8 years…. And then to boot it’s some rando like Swayman who has a very limited experience. Goalies were less bad juju back then and they’re more now since the quality of goalies has slipped. The guard from 2011 era is all gone now and there’s no goalies close to those levels anymore.. and STILL those contracts for those guys were considered to be very risky.Wait and see. The guys been great and there’s a reason they chose him over Ullmark.
pretty much everyone gets less than they were asking for.They got him for less than Swayman was asking…
An extra $250k is “finding out”…?
An extra $2million over 8 years is so little to get hung up on.Once Neely said $64m, he forced himself to have to go higher. Good on Swayman for holding his ground and getting what he thought he was worth. Good to see him signed, obv don’t like the B’s but it’s good for competitiveness in the division .
Goalies and 8 years…. And then to boot it’s some rando like Swayman who has a very limited experience. Goalies were less bad juju back then and they’re more now since the quality of goalies has slipped. The guard from 2011 era is all gone now and there’s no goalies close to those levels anymore.. and STILL those contracts for those guys were considered to be very risky.
We’re going off initial offersTheir initial offer was under 5.000 (likely shorter term). They tried to get him for less than he was worth, and they didn't. It's not a hard concept to grasp.
Don’t worry, I am not one of those people who think Bob was worth it. When you have goalies like Adin Hill, and Murray winning cups. None of it matters. Any goalie can do it under the right circumstances. That’s what history has shown. Goalies aren’t worth this type of investment considering how quickly they fluctuate and since history has shown you that you can win with any decent goalie as long the skaters are good enough.Don’t take this as an aggressive rebuttal. You might be right. But also, there was
recently a thread avowing Bob at 10 million being worth it because Florida won it all. In light of that, “wait and see” doesn’t seem outrageous either.
Welcome to Lewis Gross.All that drama for that little bit more pay?
I thought a pile of cash was going to fall out of the trunk.
All that means is swaymans ask s was too highOr Swayman was bullied into taking millions less?
He was just said to be at high 8/9M x8 mark (started from 9.5) and signed a 8.25M deal
& players or their agents can cry to the media and when the team answers back it’s the teams fault?
At the end of the day they got a deal done closer to Bruins number than Swaymans number
Bro you probably making 70k a year saying this lol.An extra $2million over 8 years is so little to get hung up on.
Glad he’s signed
Hope he’s been training while waiting around for a contract.
B’s will now be a very hard team to score on the next few years.
Will have a hard time putting the puck in the other teams net tho
should've been 10 AAV then ti would have been awesome for me as a leafs fan lol
Not much to cheer about the past... 56 years, I take it?
I really wanted those to be golf clubs...........I thought a pile of cash was going to fall out of the trunk.
Who were the the decent forwards or D that are readily available for Boston to use that cap with?Don’t worry, I am not one of those people who think Bob was worth it. When you have goalies like Adin Hill, and Murray winning cups. None of it matters. Any goalie can do it under the right circumstances. That’s what history has shown. Goalies aren’t worth this type of investment considering how quickly they fluctuate and since history has shown you that you can win with any decent goalie as long the skaters are good enough.
rangers had good teams and they had a goalie like Lundqvist and they never won a thing.
Decent goalie and a really solid team is all you need. I would never waste this kind of money on a goalie when I can lock in a deal solid dman or forward for that price instead.
Hopefully you don't mind if I keep laughing at HockeyVirus.No, not much to cheer for. We laugh at ourselves at this point.