jay from jersey
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2008
- 6,318
- 4,661
Who do you think is the weak link? All 3 of them are excellentOne of these is not like the others...
Who do you think is the weak link? All 3 of them are excellentOne of these is not like the others...
MCAvoy is a StudParayko dominates McAvoy. McAvoy isn't even an elite defensemen and should not be in the same sentence as Fox or Makar.
Hopefully that shuts all the nonsense Bruins fans were saying how they have a salary structure in place and no one gets paid more than Bergeron and Marchand etc.
Remember when a finished Karlsson signed for $2M more per year like 4 years ago?
The same guy thinks McAvoy isn’t a top pair D, and Pastrnak isn’t a 1st line player and that Tarasenko is VASTLY better… just FYIWho do you think is the weak link? All 3 of them are excellent
Ohhh one of those...The same guy thinks McAvoy isn’t a top pair D, and Pastrnak isn’t a 1st line player and that Tarasenko is VASTLY better… just FYI
I think both his agent and the team know that moving to PP1 is going to make his box car stats explode.
Apples and Oranges bro, McAvoy is one of the best defensive D men that has offensive abilities but his offensive abilities aren't as elite as the likes of Makar, Hughes, Hedman. His defensive abilities is definitely elite. In a PP i would take Hughes over McAvoy but in a PK I take McAvoy over Hughes. I think he deserves 8.5 million x 9 years so his deal now is 1 million over that. Hughes getting 7.8 million is also a fair deal. I also think young defensemen that signed this offseason over 9 million/year were all overpaid, especially Nurse. Makar and Fox are both deserving of 9 million per year. The only d man that deserves 9.5 million + is Hedman in this flat cap era.He's a better player than Quinn Hughes. He should get 8 years 8.5M or so
McAvoy is great defensively but he can't do anything close to what Hughes does on offense. Hughes plays like Fox or Makar in the offensive zone and being elite offensively should be one of the biggest factors in a defensemen getting big bucks. Otherwise Tanev deserves way more than 4 million as he is pretty elite defensively. I would say McAvoy should have gotten what Heiskenin got and not more and I think Heiskenin might be a bit better due to his skating.Yeah, if they were the same player.. McAvoy plays Defense in his own end..
These threads are always fun reads after a few years.
I'm not sure how "big" this contract really will be. Pelech and Pulock have kinda set a decent range for top-pairing, "defensive" defensemen.
I think McAvoy is elite, but he doesn't have the raw production to really be in the outer stratosphere of comparable defensemen contracts.
Jaccob Slavin makes almost half of this deal. And he's a better D-man. That's insane where the market has gone since.
HOw many points does Charlie put up? I like him, but in a more defensive role, and that’s a lot for such a role.he scored at even strength last year at the same rate as Makar and Adam Fox, had significantly better defensive impact and played tough competition. This year he’s on pp1 bc the bruins stopped being stubborn about Lhd on their power play. He’s easily one of the 3 best d alive and you can make an argument that can be supported with data that he’s the best 5v5 player driver in hockey.
when jones, werenski and nurse signed their deals I was worried chuck would be 11m because he’s so much better than them. Thankfully he wants to be in Boston.
Even strength he’s on par offensively with all the top offensive defensemen. If he can produce on the PP he could probably put up 50+ a season.HOw many points does Charlie put up? I like him, but in a more defensive role, and that’s a lot for such a role.