Value of: Boeser to Colorado

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Avs wants Boeser. Nucks fans don't want to trade Boeser and there for ask for a package that includes Newhook or Byram. Avs decline and childishly mock Boeser. /thread

Fixed it for ya bud.

 

[PAZ]

cool keep Bura, Vancouver fans didn't ask for him and are clearly not interested. I would suggest starting a poll and see how that works out for the Bura vs Boeser debate.

Cool, no Avs fan is interested in the cost to get Boeser either. I guess you need a bit of help in reading comprehension, considering I’ve never said Bura was better than Boeser, simply that he was a marginal upgrade.

 

[Spilot23]

Fixed it for ya bud.

Are you new in HF? Happens in every trade proposal where fanbase #1 wants a player proposing quantity for quality, fanbase #2 doesn’t want that trade. Fanbase #1 says the player is bad anyway. Nothing new here

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Cool, no Avs fan is interested in the cost to get Boeser either. I guess you need a bit of help in reading comprehension, considering I’ve never said Bura was better than Boeser, simply that he was a marginal upgrade.

Yet an Av's fan started this whole thread asking for Boeser, amazing considering "no av's fan is interested in the cost to get Boeser".......

 

[PAZ]

Yet an Av's fan started this whole thread asking for Boeser, amazing considering "no av's fan is interested in the cost to get Boeser".......

Are you willing to let Boeser go for OP's package? No? Great, then my statement still stands, since Boeser's value is higher than what OP offered.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Are you willing to let Boeser go for OP's package? No? Great, then my statement still stands, since Boeser's value is higher than what OP offered.

No reasonable person who understand simple value would let Boeser go for OP's package, tell the rest of your fanbase we aren't willing to sell low on Boeser or Pettersson

 

[josra33]

We aren't getting both Newhook and Byram in a deal for Boeser, come on now.

Did my man really add Newhook as a sweetener?

 

[Wildcarder]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans but doubt Avs fans are interested, even though Girard was rumoured to be the centerpiece for a potential Eichel deal.

 

[Pierce Hawthorne]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans but doubt Avs fans are interested, even though Girard was rumoured to be the centerpiece for a potential Eichel deal.

I think with the emergence of Byram, its definitely possible Girard is available or at least becomes more available over the next year.... But I also think at this point he would only be available for a long term solution at 2C for us. That's our single biggest area of weakness overall right now. Kadri is playing well so far this year and playing the role just fine for now, but he's not going to be re-signed and it doesn't look like Newhook is ready to take over that spot yet by any means for next year.

So with G likely being by far our most valuable trade chip, he would almost have to be moved for a Center at this stage. Which unfortunately Boeser is not.

 

[John Johnson]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans but doubt Avs fans are interested, even though Girard was rumoured to be the centerpiece for a potential Eichel deal.

Girard is redundant on the Canucks. They would also have add on top of Girard.

 

[Diamonddog01]

Canucks have 2 top 2 LS defenceman. Can’t think of a poorer fit than Girard.

 

[a mangy Meowth]

No reasonable person who understand simple value would let Boeser go for OP's package, tell the rest of your fanbase we aren't willing to sell low on Boeser or Pettersson

Let me just get on the intercom and let them all know

 

[John Mandalorian]

Deleted

 

[elitepete]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans

Nope.

 

[Boondock]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans but doubt Avs fans are interested, even though Girard was rumoured to be the centerpiece for a potential Eichel deal.

Undersized left handed offensive dman is not a need. Hughes, OEL and Rathbone for the long term. Investing an asset like Boeser in that position is the worst possible use of the trade chip. Girard is a very good young 2nd pairing dman on a good contract, and young enough to improve. But the Canucks have way bigger needs that a Girard. As of now we have $16+ million invested in offensive LHD. If the Canucks move Boeser it better be for a RHD and preferably one that could compliment Hughes eventually. My ideal would be a Cernak type player. If we can’t get that then what’s the use of moving the guy. As for the Center piece in an Eichel deal…probably explains why he’s in Vegas.

 

[Islay1989]

Undersized left handed offensive dman is not a need. Hughes, OEL and Rathbone for the long term. Investing an asset like Boeser in that position is the worst possible use of the trade chip. Girard is a very good young 2nd pairing dman on a good contract, and young enough to improve. But the Canucks have way bigger needs that a Girard. As of now we have $16+ million invested in offensive LHD. If the Canucks move Boeser it better be for a RHD and preferably one that could compliment Hughes eventually. My ideal would be a Cernak type player. If we can’t get that then what’s the use of moving the guy. As for the Center piece in an Eichel deal…probably explains why he’s in Vegas.

Who is the undersized offensive dman in this scenario? Sam Girard? If so, hysterical description.

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

We’ll trade you Rakell at 50% for much less

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Let me just get on the intercom and let them all know

Please, the sooner the better!

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Boeser for Girard is more of interest as a starting point for Canucks fans but doubt Avs fans are interested, even though Girard was rumoured to be the centerpiece for a potential Eichel deal.

No it's not. We don't need another undersized offensive dman.

 

[oceanchild]

As a Nucks fan For Byram I would, other then that … why

 

[McJedi]

not at all.. Burakovsky needs to be put in a specific enviroment and has chemistry in colorado. the avs finished first and third in scoring in the league the last couple years. it's not shocking his pt totals went up. he's a good player, but absolutely a tier down from Miller and Boeser.

you put either of those two on the Avs and you easily have ppg players.

Bura is a .8 PPG player for the Avs. He works there. Why trade him away and Newhook for a maybe upgrade. This concept doesn’t make sense for the Avs. Newhook may himself become every bit as good as JT Miller or Boeser.

And Bura is a very good player for the Avs as he scores a point in 4 out of every 5 games he plays for them. Many of which are goals and not secondary assists.

 

[McJedi]

That's great man, the post I responded to, that you inserted yourself into (for some reason) had nothing to do with Miller, again read the post before your respond.

Avs would be much more interested in Boeser than JT Miller. But given the Avs cap situation, it’s not realistic to find a deal here. they’ll need to find cap space for Mack and Byram. That comes from losing Erik Johnson and Kadri or Bura.

and having Newhook play on an ELC as 2C.

they don’t have space for Boeser.

the offer here that started the thread. It’s unworkable and terrible for Vancouver. Several Avs fans have said so. Only Girard could be the base of a Boeser deal.

gotta part with value for value. Many HF posters don’t grasp this concept.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Avs would be much more interested in Boeser than JT Miller. But given the Avs cap situation, it’s not realistic to find a deal here. they’ll need to find cap space for Mack and Byram. That comes from losing Erik Johnson and Kadri or Bura.

and having Newhook play on an ELC as 2C.

they don’t have space for Boeser.

the offer here that started the thread. It’s unworkable and terrible for Vancouver. Several Avs fans have said so. Only Girard could be the base of a Boeser deal.

gotta part with value for value. Many HF posters don’t grasp this concept.

And that doesn't work for us so no deal to be made here.

 

[TeddyBare]

Who is the undersized offensive dman in this scenario? Sam Girard? If so, hysterical description.

What's hysterical about referring to Girard as undersized?

 

[flyfysher]

As a Nucks fan For Byram I would, other then that … why

Yeah, I get that. But it's not happening at this time and I doubt it will anytime soon. Let's revisit what our respective team's needs are later in the season and see if there are any reasonable proposals at that time.