This I agree on. Especially because Girard is out for reasons that are much tougher to gauge than most.maybe if girard was healthy but i dont think they can spare a dman
Kakko for Byram
Same draft and Kakko’s good friends with Rantanen too
when some random person is mad at you and you don't even know who they are.
Doesn’t make sense for either team positionally. Rangers need more wingers, Colorado needs centers.Kakko for Byram
Same draft and Kakko’s good friends with Rantanen too
It’s an unrealistic and dumb premise for a thread. The Avs aren’t going to trade Byram with Girard being away from the team.
Avs fans are frustrated because he’s going through a stretch where he’s been getting a lot of penalties. But it should be mentioned that he’s been shuffled around between the left and right side. The reason he was on the right side was because the coach(es) felt it was better than having Girard on the right side (where Girard has played a significant amount). They wouldn’t have done that without a certain amount of trust in Byram.
Now he’s back on the left side with Manson. Manson from time to time will leave his responsibility. Sometimes the penalties could be from that. But the broadcast rarely clarifies or even speculates about this so the only thing that registers with fans is that he has another penalty.
Having said that, he should skate the puck up the ice more on offense and tone it down on defense instead of the opposite. Ryan Johansen is a 2C with 1 assist, so the Avs could use Byrams help on offense.
No, we need KK, he is not surplus, fact you hate him is not a factor.Kakko for Byram
Same draft and Kakko’s good friends with Rantanen too
Would adding a proven to be responsible LD help?This I agree on. Especially because Girard is out for reasons that are much tougher to gauge than most.
Byram has been frustrating for sure, but moving him now would leave a sizable hole in the lineup.
Value must reflect this unfortunate possibilityHe looked like he was going to be such a player in the Cup run.
Hopefully he’s just in a slump and this isn’t a permanent result of his injury issues
Why would the NYR “need” a guy with 3pts in 20 games?No, we need KK, he is not surplus, fact you hate him is not a factor.
Would adding a proven to be responsible LD help?
Rs should be selling high on Lindgren, and be forced to develop Robertson/Scanlin so as to have depth going forward.
Byram would be a risk, b'c there is no guarantee he optimizes his form w/change of scenery.
Howev, he would at worst be a possible short term option for that mix while others emerge,
Lindgren + Sykora (a better C prospect, possibly competing next yr in camp]
for
Byram + _____________________ [mutually agreeable add]
Value must reflect this unfortunate possibility
Ekblad looked like HUGE risk, but happily, has managed to endure
presumably it is not all about only ptsWhy would the NYR “need” a guy with 3pts in 20 games?
It would be a substantial add from the Rangers
You can make the average Avs fan salivate like Pavlov's dog merely by saying "second line center". It's an obsession.Makes no sense for Colorado to move him
if healthy makar and toews can eat a bunch of minutes but that might break them down at the end of the year. what would the avs 2nd pair be? manson and one of jj or jones. sounds very riskyThis I agree on. Especially because Girard is out for reasons that are much tougher to gauge than most.
Byram has been frustrating for sure, but moving him now would leave a sizable hole in the lineup.
IF Colorade trade Byram it will not for another DI offered Zub not long ago and was laughed at...
Typically that is what happens when you say stupid thingsI offered Zub not long ago and was laughed at...
Hard pass, offer a package without dumping Risto on usFrost and Risto for Byram and Drouin?
Not even remotely closeLindgren + Sykora (a better C prospect, possibly competing next yr in camp]
for
Byram + _____________________ [mutually agreeable add]
Makes no sense for Colorado to move him
Lindgren + Sykora (a better C prospect, possibly competing next yr in camp]
for
Byram + _____________________ [mutually agreeable add]
OkIt actually makes a lot of sense. Our 2nd line is a disaster and we need a 2C in the worst kind of way. Timing isn't great because of Girards health issues, but moving Byram to fill a more important need makes a lot of sense.