Perhaps you are a new Blues fan.
Im getting old, can your nuub eyes read those join dates for me?
Like it or not there’s hardly any argument about where the organization was going into this offseason. It’s **** or get off the pot time. You don’t get to horde all your prospects only to not play them.
Is there hardly any argument, or do they have a choice to shit or get off of the pot? Hoarde what prospects? Thomas, Kostin and Kyrou all have 3 years left on their ELC. They are all 19 or 20. I think you have it backwards, this is precisely the time you spend on veterans, when you have some talented youngsters who can supplement them.
But seriously, when people say you need to shit or get off of the pot, they are usually wrong.
The Blues have Steen, Sobotka, Berglund, Perron, and Bozak taking up 5 of the top 9 slots for the next 3 years (except Sobotka for 2 more years)
Tarasenko, Schwartz, and Schenn bring that total to 8 out of the top 9. Fabbri makes it 9. Thomas should never play on the 4th line. Who gets bumped to the 4th line, Berglund, or Sobotka? That’s piss poor asset management. Berglund should never have been resigned before he had to be. Once the Blues did commit to Berglund they should have traded Sobotka’s rights.
Unless they are traded, gone in the expansion draft, bought out, injured, or just put on the 4th line. Even if Kyrou doesnt start the season on the Blues, Sobotka might start on the 4th line. Just because we have them under contract doesnt mean that it is set in stone for the next 3 years. Things change. I dont get the Berglund hate either, he started slow after coming back from injury but still finished on pace for 20 goals. Sobotka is 20/20 hindsight, everyone was happy to have him back two years ago. And his contract is small enough to move without much trouble, and I think he will look better next season where he is going to be expected to shoulder as much offensive responsibility. If Thomas is as good as advertised, he wont be on the 4th line for long.
Bad asset management? Maybe, but every team has a couple of bad contracts, at least our's are playing a 2.5 m player 2.6 or a 4m player 5. Much, much worse contracts have been moved in this league, and a lot of them.
This team as is has too much 3rd line depth. The organization is an oxymoron. We hear from Army again and again that the NHL is getting younger and faster. His solution to that realization is Perron and Bozak?
I’d rather see a youth movement rebuild. I don’t want to watch 3 more years of mediocrity. It’s a waste. The way this roster is constructed there’s no this team is competing for a cup.
Convince me it’s better for the organization to tread water for 3 years, possibly barely making the playoffs, only to lose in the early rounds vs playing every kid possible and getting a top 10 pick for 3 years.
Convince me Petrangelo, Schenn, and Schwartz would stick around after 3 years of sucking. Convince me a bunch of top 10 picks move the needle. Even if we played every youngster we have, the rest of our roster is good enough that we would be picking in the back half of the lottery.
Vegas went to the cup a bunch of over the hill players and third liners. The Caps won the Cup despite everyone saying that they were treading water the last few years. No roster in this league is perfect, and the ones that are closest are going to be in cap hell in the coming year or two (NAS, WIN, TB).
The organization is an oxymoron.