GeeoffBrown
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2007
- 6,315
- 4,426
Then why didn't you just take your high school money and do it over and over again until you became a millionaire?But he didn’t so it doesn’t matter
There is also an American saying as well.There's a saying in french that says something like "One that you get is better than two you will get", excuse me for litteral translation, but it means you're better to take what you can get for sure now than hope to get better when you aren't certain of it
4OA for... hope for something like 4OA next year?
I'd trade 4OA, in a vacuum, for unprotected 1st 2025 + 2nd 2024 + 3rd 2025.
There's a chance you are trading 4OA for 12-15th overall and a year later.
That was Jiricek lmfao, Sillinger was from the 11th pick we already had.The last time we had such a chance at a lottery pick with Chicago, it got us Cole Sillinger. I think I'd rather have Lindstrom.
How high though? Chicago could finish around ten. You never know with a player like Bedard on the team.I get the whole a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush approach but that pick will definitely be high again, and the centers in next year's draft are better than this years imo
He’s not even close to that type of player. This isn’t the NBA.How high though? Chicago could finish around ten. You never know with a player like Bedard on the team.
Bedard could absolutely get 90+ points next year but that doesn't prevent the other team from scoring. Unfortunately for Bedard he can only be on the ice so much and even when he is on his defensive game is currently really bad.How high though? Chicago could finish around ten. You never know with a player like Bedard on the team.
Bedard could absolutely get 90+ points next year but that doesn't prevent the other team from scoring. Unfortunately for Bedard he can only be on the ice so much and even when he is on his defensive game is currently really bad.
I disagree. A star player could absolutely transform a team from bottom 5 to 12 last.He’s not even close to that type of player. This isn’t the NBA.
the only hope they have is if a goalie becomes unconscious and goes .930 for a full season. When Seth Jones or Taylor Hall is your Robin, it doesn’t matter who your Batman is.I disagree. A star player could absolutely transform a team from bottom 5 to 12 last.
Yes, this isn't the NBA, where a star can drag a team to a championship. But we're not talking about winning a championship.
No way the Hawks finish out of drafting top 10 next year. Way too many holes on the team.
This could have given Columbus two lottery eligible high 1st picks for 2025 (if they don't do well in the standings), you get to double that dice roll.
While I understand Columbus turning it down, I wouldn't have done so for Lindstrom. Then again, if I was Kyle Davidson I'd have drafted Demidov first then went for Levshunov.
A power forward with back issues at 18 is a much bigger risk than Chicago's pick somehow only being seventh overall or something of that sort.I'm pretty sure CBJ management said Lindstrom was #2 on their list only behind Celebrini. In any case they got a player they really wanted. Makes no sense to take a gamble in that case, unless you are 100% convinced the next year's draft is gonna be so deep at the top even a 5OA or something would net them a better player. Even then CBJ have abundance of prospects if anything and want to start getting better. Also Chicago would've had all incentive to start patching those holes in an aggressive manner.
So it really comes off as a high risk with most likely a neglible, if any, reward.
Okay cool.A power forward with back issues at 18 is a much bigger risk than Chicago's pick somehow only being seventh overall or something of that sort.
Or he does stay healthy and the team gets the player they envisioned to begin withDisaster of a decision.
Lindstrom may never be able to stay healthy enough to be a pro hockey player. At the very least, there’s no way he goes in the top 10 if they had a redo. Passing up what might be the 1OA and is at minimum going to realistically be a top 5 pick is going to set that franchise back even more.
Chicago would have been way more aggressive in free agency had they not been concerned with tanking again.Disaster of a decision.
Lindstrom may never be able to stay healthy enough to be a pro hockey player. At the very least, there’s no way he goes in the top 10 if they had a redo. Passing up what might be the 1OA and is at minimum going to realistically be a top 5 pick is going to set that franchise back even more.