I understand perfectly what you said.You're not getting my point about Hartman. What do you think 1.7M gets you on the open market? We are a cap strapped team... he is an asset as a 3rd liner at that price ,let alone a guy who is a RHS who can also play C. You don't let those guys go. If he was making 3-4M it would be a different story.
Again, he lead the team in playoff points... I mean, what are your expectations for 1.7M/yr?
All those XXXX's How do you propose to fill them in? With what cash? Where are we going to get not only one, but two, first liners to play with Kaprizov?
Ryan “good for a penalty against every game” Hartman. He’s not a good center. He sucks at faceoffs, a key point of contention for the second straight playoffs. Maybe 42% is good in your books, but it’s not in mine. He’s not top line quality. He barely plays any sort of special teams. If the reason he’s on the roster is because of his cap hit and not his play, that’s a lame ass reason.
He might be “good value” for $1.7M, but his play is not good value for his spot in the lineup. He gets absolutely diffed by the other team’s top center. Oh, Hartman had 5 points in 5 games? Hintz had 12(!) in 6 games. Hintz was also 60% on the draw. You cannot win with that being your 1C v 1C matchup.
As for the lineup, there are always bargain bin players to be signed.
If Zucc+Foligno are gone, that’s $9.1M right there. Nyquist might come cheap with a “prove it” deal. Put up or shut up time for Rossi. You could trade for a center with that amount of cap space too.
If they go into next year with virtually the same lineup, I will be beyond irate.
At least if you have guys like Rossi/Walker in, it’s a win-win situation. If you are winning, that’s great. If you are losing, hello top draft pick to help the team.
Which is crazy, because he was almost certainly the guy who was gapped the most by his counterpart 1C on the Stars.At least Hartman showed up in this series. Other than Nyquist probably our best forward.