thegazelle
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2019
- 318
- 539
Interesting...thanks for pointing that out. It's funny, I never thought of it that way - it truly still a tie game.There are actually MORE ties now than ever before. Teams used to average about 10 ties per season; today the average is about 13-14 tie games. Last season, a few teams played to a tie for an astounding 26 games.
Of course the OT/SO tacks on a 'win' after the real hockey game's done, but the price for that gimmick is many more 60 minute games where teams play more cautiously, knowing they can steal an extra point in 3-on-3 or shootout. Previously, the only way to get 2-points was to win the actual game. Thanks to OT/SO, teams are turtling more during the game, in the hope of grabbing the extra point afterwards in a skills competition.
You know, I used to ponder what ways to resolve this dilemma with trying to get rid of the traditional tied game = 1 point each. Lots of people have posited ideas over the years and I am sure there are handsomely paid people at the NHL who have been churning the idea in their heads.
I always though the way to get rid of the tie is to just reward points to the winner. No loser points. But then to determine the winner, how long is the league willing to subject the players in the regular season insofar as extra time - and would the fans bore quickly. Do we want to see 4 overtimes in the regular season?
I thought of one option as perhaps incentive for not ending in a tie game. If the game remains tied in regulation and in a five minute sudden death overtime...NO ONE gets any points - and you move on to the next game. I am uncertain whether the NHL brain trust will ever try something like that. But even then, some teams may be happy then to keep the tie so that their opponent doesn't move up either in any particular matchup scenario