GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 193,412
- 43,695
Either one of 2030 or 2034I read that 2034 Olympics are a slam dunk for Salt Lake, I don't know how true this is.
Either one of 2030 or 2034I read that 2034 Olympics are a slam dunk for Salt Lake, I don't know how true this is.
That simply isn’t the reporting right now.
Either one of 2030 or 2034
So I actually know someone who used to work for Enron. Yes they were surprised.
It's the old line about bankruptcy - it happens very slowly - then all at once. You can tell that something doesn't look sustainable, but the situation lasts for years and years and years - until all of a sudden it doesn't.
So look, this is some of the most negative reporting about Arizona I've seen in over a decade of following the story. But that doesn't 100% mean the team is relocating - since I was 100% convinced back in 2010-2011 the team was moving, and clearly I was wrong.
Let me say I will mourn for all Coyotes fans - it sucks to lose your hockey team. I went through that in 1996 (Winnipeg) and wouldn't wish that on any hockey fan.
What interests me the most is the reported cost of $1.2 Billion - that's nearly double the cost of Seattle just a few years ago. And I very much want to watch how the cost breaks down in terms of purchase price versus "relocation fee". The "relocation fee" was only ever charged once that I can tell, for Atlanta to Winnipeg, but it seems to cover the idea that the league wants to avoid a windfall to an otherwise failed ownership group.
Nash, Pitt, Ott, and TB all sold in the past 3 or so years. Anywhere from $800 mill odd mill to TB's $1.4 mill valuation. For those not familiar with Valuation is the price of 100% of the team, thus like TB, if you sell 40% of the team, you get 40% of $1.4 billion or $560 mill.Seattle was an expansion franchise. Its not he same thing. Senators just sold for a billion dollars (or close to it).
NHL definitely expected a Seattle bid at that time, but the success of Vegas definitely changed the game. If they had an open process, they’d get 6 or 7 bids from people who at least thought they were serious.Nash, Pitt, Ott, and TB all sold in the past 3 or so years. Anywhere from $800 mill odd mill to TB's $1.4 mill valuation. For those not familiar with Valuation is the price of 100% of the team, thus like TB, if you sell 40% of the team, you get 40% of $1.4 billion or $560 mill.
This is how any future expansion will be. All behind the scenes, like Seattle was and how this relocation is happening. NHL is done with the open bidding process they had with LV and QC as the only 2 applicants back in 2015 or so. I think the NHL was a bit embarrassed by the low turnout for a new team. With the money involved and arena situations, you kind of know who you are dealing with.
You also know who the players are for any city, due to arenas and what not. I mean in SLC, right now it was only with Smith as he owns the Jazz and likely controls the Delta Center. Same with Houston and Fertitia. Any talks about going into an NBA city would likely have to involve the NBA owner. Unless there is an entity willing to build another arena like in ATL.NHL definitely expected a Seattle bid at that time, but the success of Vegas definitely changed the game. If they had an open process, they’d get 6 or 7 bids from people who at least thought they were serious.
Timing is everything. Ryan Smith has it. No one else does.You also know who the players are for any city, due to arenas and what not. I mean in SLC, right now it was only with Smith as he owns the Jazz and likely controls the Delta Center. Same with Houston and Fertitia. Any talks about going into an NBA city would likely have to involve the NBA owner. Unless there is an entity willing to build another arena like in ATL.
So, very easy to have a conversation behind the scenes with these individuals.
I think the plan would be for Arizona to get an arena and then an expansion team. The NHL seems to want 36 teams. Houston, Atlanta, Arizona, and then one of KC/QC/TOR/???.So if this does happen does Arizona jump over Houston as the top expansion candidate if the arena gets built?
Or would this kill any talk of a new arena?
If the Jets can play in a permanent 14k seat arena, Salt Lake is more than fine to have that as a temporary home. With the Olympic bid it's pretty much a foregone conclusion they'll have a new rink. Just a matter of when and where.Wikipedia lists Delta Center at 14,000 for hockey. There are apparently some changes the NHL is going to require to play there, so it's possible that number changes slightly.
Wikipedia lists Delta Center at 14,000 for hockey. There are apparently some changes the NHL is going to require to play there, so it's possible that number changes slightly.
I read that 2034 Olympics are a slam dunk for Salt Lake, I don't know how true this is.
Many people are missing that most of those sales also came with buildings or real estate for a building or development. People keep saying the sens sold for X, they didnt. the sens, arena, land, AND the rights tto exclusive negotiiation for LeBreton development sold for X.Nash, Pitt, Ott, and TB all sold in the past 3 or so years. Anywhere from $800 mill odd mill to TB's $1.4 mill valuation. For those not familiar with Valuation is the price of 100% of the team, thus like TB, if you sell 40% of the team, you get 40% of $1.4 billion or $560 mill.
This is how any future expansion will be. All behind the scenes, like Seattle was and how this relocation is happening. NHL is done with the open bidding process they had with LV and QC as the only 2 applicants back in 2015 or so. I think the NHL was a bit embarrassed by the low turnout for a new team. With the money involved and arena situations, you kind of know who you are dealing with.
Many people are missing that most of those sales also came with buildings or real estate for a building or development. People keep saying the sens sold for X, they didnt. the sens, arena, land, AND the rights tto exclusive negotiiation for LeBreton development sold for X.
The Yotes "selling" for 1b is so disingenuous. The league is handling the sale and AM is no way getting 1B out of the deal, but the valuation of the sale will be to the tune of 1B whether that is debt forgiveness, credits to future expansion, and whatever else. There is a reason the league is negotiating and handled the sale while AM and RS groups are not dealing with each other at all. The league can walk out "values" as the "sale price" and protect the franchise values it has built up over the years. Any ability to say the coyotes sold for 1b only makes it easier for the league to ask for 1.5b-2b for the next expansion series.
100%.This is another thing that to me points to a "NHL was leaning towards expanding to SLC, and Smith was willing/eager to be a solution for the Coyotes arena problem with a franchise switch-a-roo."
Because in that scenario the "flow of money" doesn't really matter, it's all just Smith's expansion fee money being passed around over 3-5 years. Doesn't matter what the Coyotes are worth, as long as you collect the expansion number, minus a little discount to Smith for giving up the lead time for branding and taking the Coyotes 25th place roster instead of an expansion draft.
I don’t know how this makes any sense. It’s not news that they’re looking for a building. They were kicked out of one municipality, skunked in another, and some believe basically stonewalled from Phoenix by Ishbia. There’s been urgency for two years and no one’s been amenable to that.So thinking about it - the "Arizona has first shot at an expansion franchise - if there's a new arena" is not a bad thing for AM. It may in fact give him more leverage.
Right now the team is already in the Phoenix area. AM can threaten to move the team, but ASU doesn't really care. ASU is happy to have the Yotes pay rent at Mullett, but doesn't otherwise bring them much value. The various municipalities in Phoenix might not mind to have the Yotes play in their specific municipality, but there's no urgency as the team is already in Phoenix.
If the team is gone though - now there's an incentive for Phoenix/Scottsdale/Tempe/wherever to try and lure them back.
Just a thought.
Oh, you'll see the Utah fans show up.Anyone notice there is no one from Utah around here?
When Vegas was closing in on getting a team, there was couple of Vegas people hanging around here. Ditto for Seattle.
The thing is that people are amenable to hockey in Arizona... they just don't want the damn Coyotes, if that makes sense.I don’t know how this makes any sense. It’s not news that they’re looking for a building. They were kicked out of one municipality, skunked in another, and some believe basically stonewalled from Phoenix by Ishbia. There’s been urgency for two years and no one’s been amenable to that.
Expand the number of play-off teams from 16 to 32 in a 40 team NHLToo many teams already face issues with fans checking out once they are out of contention for a playoff spot. This can't be good if they keep expanding which would result in more teams being out of contention earlier than normal.
It is different when the league has done all it has to keep the team in the state. at some point it becomes a situation that people/politicians just start to believe that the league will never change course, that the league would never move the team. now that it looks to be happening does that shake some people loose? do some of the people that have not helped the coyotes find stability start to reconsider and try to be a part of a solutions?I don’t know how this makes any sense. It’s not news that they’re looking for a building. They were kicked out of one municipality, skunked in another, and some believe basically stonewalled from Phoenix by Ishbia. There’s been urgency for two years and no one’s been amenable to that.
If the owner has a good reputation, the rest won’t matter. I don’t think this will happen under Meruelo.It is different when the league has done all it has to keep the team in the state. at some point it becomes a situation that people/politicians just start to believe that the league will never change course, that the league would never move the team. now that it looks to be happening does that shake some people loose? do some of the people that have not helped the coyotes find stability start to reconsider and try to be a part of a solutions?
I think part of what also needs to be remembered here is there are people in the state that just do not trust the league based on the extortion tactics it played on glendale for years. the league in some ways tainted itself with the political world of the state. no one wanted to be the next to be burned by the NHL. now with the NHL leaving (hopefully only for a bit) maybe this will give the market and the state itself a chance to breathe and come back with a different willingness for all parties to work together.
BTW Ishbia could very well have just run a strategy play of denying access unless he got the team at a sweetheart price. it didn't happen, neither side blinked and this is just another part of why the team is moving. in a lot of ways no one can blame Ishbia based on the history of coyote owners and how/what their purchases looked like a long with just how dire the situation got. in his mind he is thinking he has the ONLY viable NHL type home for the team so why should he have to pay top dollar to do the league a favor? if the league is getting 1b for the team from RS then it's not like they or AM would have sold it to Ishbia for 500m
I also believe it is entirely possible that AM is the guy that gets the development done, gets the team back from the NHL per the agreement with the NHL, and then sells the actual arena and team to another party after he gets the development finished.If the owner has a good reputation, the rest won’t matter. I don’t think this will happen under Meruelo.