MarotteMarauder
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2022
- 536
- 531
I seriously question the concept of quarterback "development". Most of the successful quarterbacks of recent vintage were all good from the get go.It's just amazing to me what a dumpster fire this organization is. I don't trust them to develop any players. Is it the Bears drafting the wrong players, or their total ineptitude at developing them? I'm of the opinion that, had the Bears drafted Mahomes, they would have ruined him... I'm at the same point with the Bears that I am with the Sox. I don't trust them to do anything, or have a competitive organization at any point in my lifetime.
Many others never succeed or bounce around.
I think most of it lies with the QB himself and it doesn't take "that" long to see if he has "it" or not. I think Fields doesn't have "it" and will be a Jameis Winston, Jacoby Brissett, Mitch Trubisky.
Edwards is less productive than Sanborn.Initially it was assumed Jack Sanborn was the low-cost replacement for Smith. Yippee! But then in the off-season, they signed Tremain Edmunds who has had even less ball production than Smith, at a mere 2mil/yr in discount, because "Oh look, 6'5! So long. So much length!"
We need former players, Bears preferably, to help identify guys that CAN PLAY. I am so tired of all the analytics overruling the eye test.