Pez68
Registered User
Of course it is. I know you know how science works, you're not dumb.
When new evidence comes along to change your opinion, you're supposed to do it.
Your thought process is broken. You are not supposed to form opinions WITHOUT EVIDENCE. Which you do. Constantly. Then you continue to ONLY look at evidence to support your flawed opinion. Until the evidence to the contrary is so overwhelming that you have no choice but to concede you were wrong. This is not logical thinking. This is not critical thinking.
It's like flipping a coin three times, and then coming up with the opinion that coin flips are ALWAYS heads. Because it landed on heads three times. Completely ignoring sample size and other alternatives.