Michoulicious
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2014
- 7,511
- 8,259
Kapanen by default because he can't go to the AHL.... But contract situation aside, ABB is my choice.
Depends if they decide to keep 13 or 14 forwards. They could keep two if they only have 13 forwards if Roy is sent down.Erhmmm... Two of those players will remain, no?
I’d keep Kap, Hein, and Tuch before Roy.Id send Roy and ABB in the AHL , keep Heineman and Kapanen. Roy sucks
Unless there's a good reason to keep 8 D-Men or 3 netminders that I'm not aware of, 14 forwards will remain up.Depends if they decide to keep 13 or 14 forwards. They could keep two if they only have 13 forwards if Roy is sent down.
Id send Roy and ABB in the AHL , keep Heineman and Kapanen. Roy sucks
Be honest and admit that you just want Armia on the second line.I’d keep Kap, Hein, and Tuch before Roy.
The guy is lazy, and was invisible. Scary to think people are pushing this guy to be on the 2nd line.
No I’d like to see Kap or Hein.Unless there's a good reason to keep 8 D-Men or 3 netminders that I'm not aware of, 14 forwards will remain up.
No reason to send Roy down, unless you really, really want Joel Armia on the second line.
Be honest and admit that you just want Armia on the second line.
Gally will get injured and that's almost for sure. So there will be opportunity for the third name on the list.I wished both ABB and Kapanen would stay but for it to happen MSL would have to sit one of Gally or Anderson so it won't happen.
I voted for ABB because Kap is still young and another year in Europe would not be detrimental.
But if MSL has guts he will sit Anderson. The guy is useless.
Gally had a decent end of the season so I'm not against giving him another chance.
I like both a lot. I purely choose Kapanen because otherwise he's gone to Europe.I don't know if Harvey-Pinard has a spot anymore. Probably comes back and gets sent on a conditioning stint in Laval then becomes the 13th forward.
I'd pick between Kapanen and Heineman... hard to chose which as I like both. Probably Heineman.
Agreed..........he has been here in NA playing in the AHL waiting, and he has been good during camp.I like what Heineman brings of these three. Kapanen looks good but I would send him back to Europe and play him next year.
Let's say management has Kapanen as the best of the 3. So they keep Kaoanen.Kapanen for me.
All three I thought had good camps. ABB I dismissed out of hand but he surprised me. If he clears waivers, he'd be a great injury call up who can actually hang.
With Heineman, there's something there. Might need another year but I think he's worth a look.
I think so. We don't need 8 D when the guys sitting are not the age of ABB or Pezz.Let's say management has Kapanen as the best of the 3. So they keep Kaoanen.
Do we then keep 14 forwards instead of risking putting Pez or ABB through waivers? We'll see...
I think so. We don't need 8 D when the guys sitting are not the age of ABB or Pezz.
I think our four top defenders are Matheson, Guhle, Savard and Struble, with Hutson the offenceman. Xhekaj and Barron will split 6th/7th duties. Mailloux and Engstrom to Laval instead of press box.
It is better for ABB to be in the NHL if he is top 14.They could also go 13 forwards, 7 dmen, and 2 goalies.
Is it better to have ABB playing in Laval, but risk losing him to waivers, or sitting in the stands?
Remember when we had Frolik but never played him? Frolik later said that ruined his career. I suppose we could keep ABB as the 13th/14th forward and then if there are no injuries and he doesn't play for long stretches, send him down later.It is better for ABB to be in the NHL if he is top 14.