Let me see your phone. I'm still on page 29.
Why didn’t you mention his issues in Toronto and Detroit ? Why is a player wanting their coach to understand them a bad thing?why shouldn’t the star players, with the “mega” contracts have a say?
That's a pretty bizarre takeaway from my post.
If I was him I would stay away. You know that some people are going to come up some BS to get him you fired.
Has a Columbus player come out and said Babcock literally took their phone from his hand and started looking through their phone? Or has the NHL said this is what Babcock did?
Not so much covering for him, but as a captain how can you go and release that statement then have your teammates talk to the PA about Babcock.
Being a priest is a tough job. A lot of things should stay between a priest and children.
going to be interesting to see what the locker room atmosphere will be like. invasion of privacy is serious, but as others pointed out, if the younger players didn't feel comfortable they could have a) said no (easier said than done if it's your boss asking) or b) raising it to the C or A. spilling it to an outside party instead of the first two options won't sit well with the rest of the team I believe. this is not about sweeping under the rug, but like in other organizations, you voice it to a designated person internally to be addressed. if he/she don't act on it, this is a different matter then.
I'm just assuming not every player was treated the same, and Jenner just spoke to what happened with him.
It does.
I didn't want to get into a legal discussion with you - but I guess I need to.
Here:
Privacy
Privacy generally refers to an individual’s right to seclusion or right to be free from public interference. Often privacy claims clash with First Amendment rightsfirstamendment.mtsu.edu
Do you believe the NHL CBA takes precedence over the 1st amendment right to privacy? It does not.
I specialize in privacy and data protection law. Day in and day out, it is all that I do. I can confirm that there is most definitely no 1st Amendment right to privacy (and in any event, it would only apply to government infringement on an individual’s privacy). The 4th Amendment prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure (again, by the government) is as close as the US Constitution gets, but a couple of cases in the mid-late 70s (Smith and Miller) resulted in the establishment of the 3rd Party Doctrine, which effectively says that as soon as you share personal information with a 3rd party (online service provider, telecom, internet provider, etc.), you no longer have any reasonable expectation of privacy regarding that information. State and sectoral privacy laws abound in the US (and a new one seems to be enacted every week) but there is no comprehensive US federal privacy law (which is partly to blame for recent tensions and friction with the EU re: Schrems II).did you literally google "First Amendment Privacy" and take the second result and offer it up as a legal argument?
sorry, I know I said I was out before... but I can't anymore. you probably shouldn't either.
A hockey locker room is not a therapy session, you're getting payed millions of $$$ to play a game, the coach is not there to babysit your ass and hold your hand. young guys today are soft as butter. I have an idea why not get rid of all coaches ad let the players coach themselves, I mean thats what they're doing right now anyway. Why have coaches then?
