Agree to disagree. Being critical isn't necessarily being negative. It's actually coming from a place of wanting to see this team succeed.
I.E. I like Lindgren as a target. I'm not thrilled with the price we paid.
Mittlestadt needs to play better for us to have a shot. That's just a fact. He's been objectively terrible for a large stretch of the year.
EDIT: I'll add too that if CMac was proactive with goaltending in the summer, we likely don't need to move Kovalenko in the Blackwood deal. The writing was on the wall with Georgiev. It might seem like nitpicking but continue to add unnecessary value to trades adds up over time.
I agree many here could take a more even keel approach, but it's coming from a place of passion.
I agree that being critical is not automatically being negative. But I read the whole thread and believe me it was definitely negative.
Those things you said here are definitely more critical than negative, but that's not how you and others were writing before.
I agree CMac should have tried to move Georgiev in the summer, but a) we don't know for sure that he didn't try and b) I respect him for fixing the mistake as quickly as he did - most GMs would not have done so.
Lastly, I'll strongly disagree with "Mittlestadt needs to play better for us to have a shot.". Mittlestadt could play like absolute garbage and we'd still have a shot as long as MacKinnon, Makar, Blackwood, Toews, Nichushkin, Drouin, Necas, etc play well. This is a team with quite possibly the best forward and best defenseman in the league, so to hear people say we have no shot in the playoffs and then claim it is fact is frankly ridiculous.
Don't let the negative nancies get you down. Some folks on here just want to bitch and moan and call it being objective/critical. I say let them. It gets pretty obvious when someone is determined to have a bad time here
I'm fine with ignoring individuals. It starts to bother me when the negativity starts to be treated as common knowledge, which people then build arguments upon. It starts with "Mittlestadt sucks" and then moves on to "The Avs MUST make a move", "The Avs don't have a 2C", "CMac should be fired", "We can't make any moves if it prevents us from getting a 2C", "We can't win in the playoffs with Mitts". etc, etc..
The exhausting part is that in order to argue against any of those points, it's necessary to first address the underlying assumption. But since that underlying assumption has essentially become an object of faith after so much repetition, it's difficult to challenge it.
And if it helps, replace Mittlestadt with Toews from earlier in the season and you can see why it's a problem.