GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,792
- 10,790
Do you think it's more likely or less likely that he returns and has a long, successful, NHL career?
Yes. It's more likely.
Do you think it's more likely or less likely that he returns and has a long, successful, NHL career?
It’s probably better to just not include Byram in trade proposals, his value is just too tough to accurately gauge and the risk is too high for both sides. If he continues to have problems his value will plummet but if he returns to form he is worth too much to trade unless it’s for a young cost controlled asset. Much easier to just take him out of the discussion and treat him as an untouchable.
The value of a Newhook level prospect is a lot easier to define. Krebs, Brannstrom, & Suzuki have all been dealt in recent history and are similar in value to Newhook today.
I remember havlat , I forgot who else but the point is Hossa was very much a key difference maker , and after he went out on injury you could see how much he meant to the team and toews performance.Outside of Havlat leaving in FA, which really good players did they also move? It was basically the same team that went to the conference finals the year before with Hossa replacing Havlat
It certainly was when he couldnt skateI definitely would not say vastly more.
Kane is 33 years old, signed for 2 more years.
Agree that Eichel's cap hit is much, much larger which is obviously a huge detriment, but he is signed for 4.5 years, and is 25 years old, just now entering his statistical prime. The argument could go either way on which is better imo, but the difference between the two is not vast imo.
Sure but its hard for Colorado to offer much more value wiseReally risky to trade for a guy who might have a very short career.
Untouchable prospects must become touchable when you're talking about a player like Kane.Difference between Alex Newhook and a lot of the recent comparables (Krebs, Suzuki, Branstromm) is that Newhook is already producing well at the NHL level. He's not particularly a what-if at the moment, he's pacing for 45-50 points as a rookie
Byram had 4 goals 7 assists in 18 games as a rookie defender before injury, if that doesn't seem like the "untouchable prospect" realm then I'm not sure what would
Byram has posted 11 points in 18 games with only 1 point on the powerplay (he's only got 20mins PP time total this year).To all the avs fans who are so wedded to Byram and newhook.
Byram is still in his entry level contract
He played 19 games last year a whopping 2 points
This year he has played 18 games and a total of 11 points
Let's be honest here his numbers don't scream future all star or hall of fame. Could he become great maybe but his numbers currently don't scream in untouchable
Nor does newhook...
Untouchable prospects must become touchable when you're talking about a player like Kane.
I am literally interested in nothing the Avs have to offer other than Newhook and Byram. Both or go pound sand.Go eat some pork snagglins or a can of Butter Da
I am literally interested in nothing the Avs have to offer other than Newhook and Byram. Both or go pound sand.
You're delusional to think you can acquire Kane without at least Newhook as the centerpiece.
Arguably the most dangerous team already. No point in gutting our young talent pool to add another high end point producer. We score enough goals.Yes Colorado acquiring kane makes them a serious and dangerous team
I am literally interested in nothing the Avs have to offer other than Newhook and Byram. Both or go pound sand.
You're delusional to think you can acquire Kane without at least Newhook as the centerpiece.
Good thing Joe Sakic called Kyle Davidson and asked what the King of Town is literally interested in
You're delusional if you think better players haven't been traded for less
I hear what you’re saying.
Kaut + 1st.
Honestly that's too much at this point IMO. Kane will probably walk at the end of his deal anyways.I hear what you’re saying.
Kaut + 1st.
Don't disagree at all.Sure but its hard for Colorado to offer much more value wise
Karlsson is the best recent example although he was a lot younger at the time of the trade and was considered a top 3 defenceman in the league so carried more value. A comparable trade today to EK would be Compher (Tierney), Barron (Norris), Kaut (Balcers), Demelo (3rd) a 1st expected in the 20’s, a second, and some conditional picks.Unfortunately in the real world both GMs have those discussions and decisions to make. Kane is still producing 80 plus points a season and a 3 time stanley cup champ, your not going to find in recent years a player of his caliber being traded , so his cost is completely different than eichel or anyone else in recent history. Byram there isn't a guarantee one way or another with him but if both teams agree than I guess he becomes part of the deal... Chicago won't move kane unless both kane agrees and chicago can't pass up the deal...