AVSfan2daMAX
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2006
- 5,535
- 6,844
Watch MacKinnon go on an absolute heater to end the season now. We got a championship caliber squad now.
Yeah, I'm guilty of this. But Ritchie was our best trade piece, would have loved to see it used to help with both this playoff run and the next. Time will tell whether the gamble was worth it!Haha this f***ing site is hilarious.
We've apparently been wasting years of Mack and Mak primes.
But also fawning over some prospect who may or may not have panned out.
Do you want to win it now or not? Ritchie doesn't help us at all right now.
CMac has massive cajones this year. Let's go.
Keep him.Do we want to trade Mitts now or we keep him at 3C?
If we trade him we have no middle 6 center for next year unless we keep Nelson. Now that Ritchie is gone we have no one possibly coming up either.
I think @RoyIsALegend is too high on Nelson but you're too low. We'll all meet in the middle.Holy shit, what an awful trade.
We gave up more than Pittsburgh did for Marian Hossa, just to get a way inferior player. Nelson is above-average, but he looked f***ing awful in the Four Nations and IMHO doesn't tilt our team to a contender. And we gave up our future 2nd line centre in return with a ton of RFA years on top of that.
I immensely dislike this all around.
Brother did you seriously compare this trade to one made 17 years ago? LolHoly shit, what an awful trade.
We gave up more than Pittsburgh did for Marian Hossa, just to get a way inferior player. Nelson is above-average, but he looked f***ing awful in the Four Nations and IMHO doesn't tilt our team to a contender. And we gave up our future 2nd line centre in return with a ton of RFA years on top of that.
I immensely dislike this all around.
I think if this team wants to win, they need a 3rd liner with speed and skill to add some offensive punch.Agreed on this, but we need a another RD over a depth forward I believe.
Smart pro scouting, offseason signings, and cap wizardry are what make a successful team. Draft picks and futures do not. The Buffalo Sabres are a prime example of this.Vegas has been good example of how to do this. You can hate them as much as you ever want, but the fact is they have been successful doing this. They "always" trade the first rounders away and concentrates on the current season and worry about the future later. They don't necessarily win that many cups, but they are almost without exception serious contenders.
Holy shit, what an awful trade.
We gave up more than Pittsburgh did for Marian Hossa, just to get a way inferior player. Nelson is above-average, but he looked f***ing awful in the Four Nations and IMHO doesn't tilt our team to a contender. And we gave up our future 2nd line centre in return with a ton of RFA years on top of that.
I immensely dislike this all around.
and which pending UFA you have in mind?You do understand that there's a thing called "UFA market", right?
Yeah kinda.Do we have the cap for a depth RD? Or am I too greedy?
mitts is def gone
Also aggressive trading - which of course requires that smart pro scouting, but when there are jackeichels and noahhanifins available you go and get them instead of this what this thread shows as "oh I think he might someday maybe become an ok player if lucky and i feel like it might have been a bad move to maybe consider moving him". You pull the trigger and actually go for it.Smart pro scouting, offseason signings, and cap wizardry are what make a successful team. Draft picks and futures do not. The Buffalo Sabres are a prime example of this.
It is just four games, 100% accurate, but it is a pretty big tournament not only for yourself internally, but also to compare yourself against the best of the league. It's not a "random sample size" brethren. The Stanley Cup playoffs, especially going in the deeper rounds, is more of the best of and he didn't stand up to the test.lol, why are you constantly harping on how he looked in the 4Nations??
It’s a random 4 game sample with a bunch of guys with no structure.
Islanders won this trade already. Relieved as a Jets fan because I didn't want us to trade for Nelson.
I am predicting Brock Nelson is going to be the biggest disappointment amongst trades go at the deadline.
I don't see an issue, both are pure rental trades.Brother did you seriously compare this trade to one made 17 years ago? Lol
Well start from Mikko Rantanen for example.and which pending UFA you have in mind?
That would have been an awful trade as well.We literally purposed this trade for Lindholm last year so I don't see why we'd hate it now for Nelson.
Ah yes, middle 6 center Mikko Rantanen.Well start from Mikko Rantanen for example.
Seriously? There is no sense in comparing a trade made in 2008 to one made in 2025.I don't see an issue, both are pure rental trades.