Auston Matthews is one of the worst even-strength scorers in the entire league

I'm just saying, it's not ridiculous to suggest that Matthews hit his peak already, it's actually quite likely. Like you said, he'd have to defy the age curve to peak after his mid 20s.

The crux of my comment isn't centered around the examples I picked, it was just to illustrate how it happened to the best in the games.

Also fwiw, P. Kane "peaked" in his age 26-27 season, hasn't won an award after that.

But like I said earlier, those are averages and the decrease in production usually pretty slow, saying Matthews might have hit is peak after an amazing 60 goals in 73 games season =/= Matthews is done lol

My point is that the top scorer age curve is just a proxy measurement for "guys who were most likely to get seriously injured by 25". The players who drop off don't have gradual reductions in play from 23 to 24 to 25, they have a specific moment where they get concussed or break their leg in half that fundamentally changes how they play for the next few seasons and drops their productivity. Matthews could very well run into such an injury but it's not going to be just a gradual fall-off with no explanation other than "age curve", it's going to be something like a concussion, back injury, or complete wrist reconstruction that takes him out of commission for 40+ games and he never comes back the same.

Most top scorers come into the league at 18 or 19 weighing 185 pounds soaking wet and are expected to play 20+ minutes a night while being the other teams #1 checking target. You don't get to do that and stay healthy for very long until you build up adult mass and on-ice awareness from experience.
 
Last edited:
My point is that the top scorer age curve is just a proxy measurement for "guys who were most likely to get seriously injured by 25". The players who drop off don't have gradual reductions in play from 23 to 24 to 25, they have a specific moment where they get concussed or break their leg in half that fundamentally changes how they play for the next few seasons and drops their productivity. Matthews could very well run into such an injury but it's not going to be just a gradual fall-off with no explanation other than "age curve", it's going to be something like a concussion, back injury, or complete wrist reconstruction that takes him out of commission for 40+ games and he never comes back the same.



Here's two different analysis on the subject of the age curve. The first one approaches it using WAR, the second using points per game.

Thousands of data points - obviously concentrated around the mid-20's for obvious reasons.

But, the age curve is defined by the 3 star players who had big injuries, and Matthews is a parangon of health and durability and will likely have a season higher than 60 goals and 106 points.
 


Here's two different analysis on the subject of the age curve. The first one approaches it using WAR, the second using points per game.

Thousands of data points - obviously concentrated around the mid-20's for obvious reasons.

But, the age curve is defined by the 3 star players who had big injuries, and Matthews is a parangon of health and durability and will likely have a season higher than 60 goals and 106 points.

Yes this chart is a slam dunk proof that every player will peak at 22, plateau through 25-28, and then drop off.
Screen-Shot-2018-08-05-at-4.09.16-PM-768x438.png


You understand that an aggregate curve with thousands of data points is not the actual expectation for how any individual career in that sample goes right? The average person has a little under one breast and one testicle but I haven't seen many of those around recently.

Something has to actually happen for their games to fall off like league scoring dropping, injury, or a coaching change that neuters their offense a la Ovi with Hunter. On aggregate it'll look like a smooth curve down because for every top scorer that has a sudden drop in scoring for the above reasons, there's 5 others that don't have a major setback and maintain their peak production +/- 10%.
 
Last edited:
hey OP thanks for the anti-jinx thread.

Many Thanks!

Signed,
Leafs Nation
Yea, that' ll break the slump.

Hey, Austin can go on a heater or extend his current slump......as long as he keeps his pants on in public ..... it's all good !
 
He's led the league in 5v5 goals in 4 of his 6 seasons, and the seasons he didn't he was injured. But, yeah, one of the worst ES goal scorers in the league off a 17 game sample. Even factoring in these 17 games, from the start of the 2020/21 season he has 11 more ES goals than 2nd in 10 less games, and 20 more than 3rd with 10 less games.
 
Yea, that' ll break the slump.

Hey, Austin can go on a heater or extend his current slump......as long as he keeps his pants on in public ..... it's all good !

hey at least Auston's club doesn't draft disgusting people into the franchise or force him to learn "french:

:laugh:
 
Over the past four seasons Matthews has cumulatively led the league in ESG/60.

Small sample size.

That said, it’s entirely possible he peaked last year in terms of winning the Richard/Hart. Will be hard to replicate that.
 
Yes this chart is a slam dunk proof that every player will peak at 22, plateau through 25-28, and then drop off.
Screen-Shot-2018-08-05-at-4.09.16-PM-768x438.png


You understand that an aggregate curve with thousands of data points is not the actual expectation for how any individual career in that sample goes right? The average person has a little under one breast and one testicle but I haven't seen many of those around recently.

Something has to actually happen for their games to fall off like league scoring dropping, injury, or a coaching change that neuters their offense a la Ovi with Hunter. On aggregate it'll look like a smooth curve down because for every top scorer that has a sudden drop in scoring for the above reasons, there's 5 others that don't have a major setback and maintain their peak production +/- 10%.

Yep.

Which is why I don't understand why it's egregious to suggest that Matthews has peaked already.

Especially after he put up insane numbers last year, and winning the Hart/Rocket?
 
Yea, that' ll break the slump.

Hey, Austin can go on a heater or extend his current slump......as long as he keeps his pants on in public ..... it's all good !

Shouldn't you be saying this to Logan Mailloux?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rob Brown
I've been waiting for the right thread to say this and somewhat random, perhaps..

But TOR coach has GOT to stop saying "our elite players" in interviews. It's divisive, alienating and likely builds envy & resentment. Creates an us vs them mentality and I can imagine it can get cliquey. He should just say "our scorers" or "top 6 players".

Cos think about this for a second, even the worst player on TOR would score 15-30 goals in a beer league game. They're ALL elite players. They worked their ASS off to get where they are, and all players PRIDE themselves at being elite.

It basically sends a message that if you don't score-- you're not 'elite'. Well guess what? Bottom 6 players absolutely ID as being elite defensively or however way they can help out. They identify as being elite as young as pre-teenage years.

Even bottom 6 players were the best of the best under age 16 and likely dominated games.

To say "our elite players" you're basically saying everyone else sucks.

It's not cool. There's plenty different phraseologies to ID certain players & communicate the message.


-My humble 0.02

Ya, that’s what the leafs need. More coddling.

Everyone on the team knows what these guys make. They are professionals, and if they get upset they’re not being referred to as elite, well… be better.
 
Ya, that’s what the leafs need. More coddling.

Everyone on the team knows what these guys make. They are professionals, and if they get upset they’re not being referred to as elite, well… be better.

I can see this thread being bumped a few times as soon as Matthews goes on a tear.
 
Yep.

Which is why I don't understand why it's egregious to suggest that Matthews has peaked already.

Especially after he put up insane numbers last year, and winning the Hart/Rocket?

It's not insane, maybe he did have his peak GPG season but the "drop" would be to the mid-high 50s and 100+ points, not to 40-50 with 80 points like posted in here. This would hold through either his early 30s or first major injury/league scoring shift, whichever comes first.

Again the point is that people look at the aging curve and act like if you hit 50/100 at 23 you're going to score 45/95, 40/90 at 24/25 and settle in as a 35/85 player through rest of your 20s. The reality is that you're going to score 52/106, 42/98, 49/95 and then get injured and drop down to a 30/80 player when you come back. Actual careers aren't as smooth as the graph and the drop from peak is usually much more sudden and has a clear cause and effect.

I genuinely can't think of a player who had a a smooth decay from his 23-25 peak like that graph does, players don't just slowly get marginally worse at that age without outside factors influencing it.
 
Last edited:
He has a minuscule 2 EV goals in 18 games despite some of the highest ice time for forwards across the NHL. He might not even hit 35 goals this year overall.
Nice…your losing sleep over AM34 huh! :laugh:

He has won back to back ROCKETS. Hart, Ted Lindsay, Calder…. Yeah.

How many Rockets has McDavid win again?


1668826090460.jpeg

1668826151451.jpeg
 
just a reminder, even strength goals since Matthews joined the NHL

1. Matthews - 198 (425 games)
2. McDavid - 181 (459 games)
3. Ovechkin - 168 (454 games)
4. Drai/Pasta/Marchand - 141

pretty big gaps there tbh
First is worst, haven't you heard?
On pace for 9 ES goals . Lol

Yea, that' ll break the slump.

Hey, Austin can go on a heater or extend his current slump......as long as he keeps his pants on in public ..... it's all good !
You seem to live a sad life.
 
First is worst, haven't you heard?



You seem to live a sad life.

Shouldn't you be saying this to Logan Mailloux?
Was he on the team when the Habs eliminated Matthews and the leafs?

hey at least Auston's club doesn't draft disgusting people into the franchise or force him to learn "french:

:laugh:
No, although his "club" has a well know record of employing much worse at Maple Leaf Gardens .
 
Last edited:
What lol?

The past 3 seasons (half of his NHL career) he was was pacing for 93 points (closer to 100 than 82), 104 points and 124 119 points.

Mans been the best 5 on 5 goal scorer since entering the league and because hes in a slump some Habs fan gotta make a thread about it trying to act like the dude is washed.

Hes also shooting 6% lower than his career average atm.
Troll threads like these are made purely to bait serious responses. Don't feed the trolls as they say...
 
lol at all the haters, i'm sure he'll shut you all up when he ends the season with 20 goals provong once again how generational he is

he'll add about 4 goals in 7 playoffs games too
 
  • Like
Reactions: PuckG

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad