July 1, 2023I have a question
When can the Leaf sign him to a new contract
Yeah, this season has really demonstrated how horrible the so-called "eye test" actually is for a lot of people here. A lot of people are only capable of seeing the end result of goals and making assumptions based off that, instead of understanding what's actually happening.He hasn't really sacrificed offense though he's just shooting well below his carerr average of 16.4%. If he continues his pace and get's back to that rate he'd be on pace for 59.7 goals this year. He's been snakebitten and shooting just 11% so far.
Players with 1-year contracts can be re-signed starting January 1st.No idea why but I thought it was Jan 1st
Since Matthews entered the league no one has svored more goals.I remember a prophetic post I read here after the 2019 Dubas vs rfa's fiasco.
It said to pay attention to the following every year going forward.
1. NO other offseason will have anywhere near the "offersheet" hysteria than 2019. It was a made up narrative to rationalize the Dubas unprecedented dramatic overpayments. And this one has been true. Not a peep about offersheets. You don't ever hear anything about it to anywhere NEAR the same level. Only in 2019.
2. NO other season will focus on /60 stats. The leaf forums became a meme NHL wide for literally out of nowhere relying on /60 stats because our players had mediocre real stats. Never since has this forum been flooded with /60 stats in relation to rfa numbers. That was a very uniquely 2019 statistic... and leaf fans are still mocked for it sometimes.
3. The very second... the very SECOND... Matthews starts putting up REAL elite numbers, the /60 gaslighting scheme will be 100% abandoned. And it has. lol. (well, other than when he's off his game. It rears its ugly head sometimes when that happens).
4. If Matthews has a bad year offensively the narrative will immediately change to how "well" he's playing defense. Lol, and here we have it. Matthews is 18th in points and goals and only TWO players above him have a higher aav than him. He's underperforming his contract BIG TIME. And so look at this forum FLOODING the board with his defensive stats. Lol, so predictable.
Like I said, it was a prophetic post. And it all came true.
He's not earning his contract THIS year. He earned it last year (in the regular season anyways). He demanded being paid as (tied for) the best player in the league (when term is included) so I expect at the very least a Richard and Hart every season. He's currently 18th in points and almost THIRTY points behind the player he demanded to be paid the same as.Since Matthews entered the league no one has svored more goals.
So he is not underforming his contract.
I suppose you choose to ignore every post/article/podcast that talks about per 60 as it is still widely used all over the place and not just mentioning the Leafs.
Whatever wild fascination you have will dramatic unprecidented overpayments just let it go and stop inventing ways to falsely pat yourself on the back.
I'm just curious if at all you've considered that the Leafs playing better defensively has affected things. Like McDavid is McDavid and he will put up points, but the Oilers play pond hockey and are on the pp for half the game. What I am getting at is if the Leafs play closer to the Islanders than they do the Oilers, the offensive numbers will be lower. If you don't really care how they play and it's just point totals vs. dollars you care about, fine.I remember a prophetic post I read here after the 2019 Dubas vs rfa's fiasco.
It said to pay attention to the following every year going forward.
1. NO other offseason will have anywhere near the "offersheet" hysteria than 2019. It was a made up narrative to rationalize the Dubas unprecedented dramatic overpayments. And this one has been true. Not a peep about offersheets. You don't ever hear anything about it to anywhere NEAR the same level. Only in 2019.
2. NO other season will focus on /60 stats. The leaf forums became a meme NHL wide for literally out of nowhere relying on /60 stats because our players had mediocre real stats. Never since has this forum been flooded with /60 stats in relation to rfa numbers. That was a very uniquely 2019 statistic... and leaf fans are still mocked for it sometimes.
3. The very second... the very SECOND... Matthews starts putting up REAL elite numbers, the /60 gaslighting scheme will be 100% abandoned. And it has. lol. (well, other than when he's off his game. It rears its ugly head sometimes when that happens).
4. If Matthews has a mediocre year offensively the narrative will immediately change to how "well" he's playing defense. Lol, and here we have it. Matthews is 18th in points and goals and only TWO players above him have a higher aav than him. He's underperforming his contract BIG TIME. And so look at this forum FLOODING the board with his defensive stats. Lol, so predictable.
Like I said, it was a prophetic post. And it all came true.
Good D doesn't pay the big bucks. You don't pay a guy as the highest paid player in the league (when term is included) and then say "focus on D". Defensive specialist forwards make 3-4 mil. Not 11.6I'm just curious if at all you've considered that the Leafs playing better defensively has affected things. Like McDavid is McDavid and he will put up points, but the Oilers play pond hockey and are on the pp for half the game. What I am getting at is if the Leafs play closer to the Islanders than they do the Oilers, the offensive numbers will be lower. If you don't really care how they play and it's just point totals vs. dollars you care about, fine.
You don't need to come back screaming with your UDO shtick (worried me giving it an acronym cause I'm too lazy to type it all will cause it to stick) or that Matthews is a disgrace or yada yada. I'm just wondering yes or no if you've at all considered it or if it's just pts totals vs. $ regardless of how the team plays.
What is more important?He's not earning his contract THIS year. He earned it last year (in the regular season anyways). He demanded being paid as (tied for) the best player in the league (when term is included) so I expect at the very least a Richard and Hart every season. He's currently 18th in points and almost THIRTY points behind the player he demanded to be paid the same as.
Does my position seem unreasonable? Outrageous even? Damn right it does.
Outrageous contracts come with outrageous expectations.
There was offer sheet hysteria in 2019, but it was never to "rationalize unprecedented dramatic overpayments". "Unprecedented dramatic overpayments" never existed in the first place, much less at that point in time. It was just a catchphrase you repeated ad nauseum to misrepresent our signings, despite it being repeatedly proven to you that the contracts had a ton of precedence and were consistent with the history of post-ELC contracts.1. NO other offseason will have anywhere near the "offersheet" hysteria than 2019. It was a made up narrative to rationalize the Dubas unprecedented dramatic overpayments. And this one has been true. Not a peep about offersheets. You don't ever hear anything about it to anywhere NEAR the same level. Only in 2019.
First off, per-60 statistics are still used just as much, if not more. I don't know where you've gotten the idea that they've disappeared.2. NO other season will focus on /60 stats. The leaf forums became a meme NHL wide for literally out of nowhere relying on /60 stats because our players had mediocre real stats. Never since has this forum been flooded with /60 stats in relation to rfa numbers. That was a very uniquely 2019 statistic... and leaf fans are still mocked for it sometimes.
3. The very second... the very SECOND... Matthews starts putting up REAL elite numbers, the /60 gaslighting scheme will be 100% abandoned. And it has. lol.
1. Matthews is not underperforming his contract.4. If Matthews has a mediocre year offensively the narrative will immediately change to how "well" he's playing defense. Lol, and here we have it. Matthews is 18th in points and goals and only TWO players above him have a higher aav than him. He's underperforming his contract BIG TIME. And so look at this forum FLOODING the board with his defensive stats. Lol, so predictable.
I think Willy being more of a shooter than Mitch helps, as it splits focus - Matthews is 13.4% since the switch.He hasn't really sacrificed offense though he's just shooting well below his carerr average of 16.4%. If he continues his pace and get's back to that rate he'd be on pace for 59.7 goals this year. He's been snakebitten and shooting just 11% so far.
This is bang on.Since Matthews entered the league no one has svored more goals.
So he is not underforming his contract.
I suppose you choose to ignore every post/article/podcast that talks about per 60 as it is still widely used all over the place and not just mentioning the Leafs.
Whatever wild fascination you have will dramatic unprecidented overpayments just let it go and stop inventing ways to falsely pat yourself on the back.
Matthews had his best shooting percentage years with Marner, and 13.4% is still well below his average, so that's a weird conclusion.I think Willy being more of a shooter than Mitch helps, as it splits focus - Matthews is 13.4% since the switch.
I think his conclusion is drawn off the presumption that having another legitimate shooting threat opens up more opportunity for matthews.Matthews had his best shooting percentage years with Marner, and 13.4% is still well below his average, so that's a weird conclusion.
Correct, and I was also replying to a post speaking about this year.I think his conclusion is drawn off the presumption that having another legitimate shooting threat opens up more opportunity for matthews.
However I believe it has helped Nylander more than it has helped matthews.
I think it’s due to most defence and goalies anticipating Matthews shooting vs Nylander. Plus Matthews is a better playmaker vs JT.Correct, and I was also replying to a post speaking about this year.
I agree that it also helps Nylander, but I'm not sure whether it's more playing with Matthews or not playing with JT.
I remember a prophetic post I read here after the 2019 Dubas vs rfa's fiasco.
It said to pay attention to the following every year going forward.
1. NO other offseason will have anywhere near the "offersheet" hysteria than 2019. It was a made up narrative to rationalize the Dubas unprecedented dramatic overpayments. And this one has been true. Not a peep about offersheets. You don't ever hear anything about it to anywhere NEAR the same level. Only in 2019.
2. NO other season will focus on /60 stats. The leaf forums became a meme NHL wide for literally out of nowhere relying on /60 stats because our players had mediocre real stats. Never since has this forum been flooded with /60 stats in relation to rfa numbers. That was a very uniquely 2019 statistic... and leaf fans are still mocked for it sometimes.
3. The very second... the very SECOND... Matthews starts putting up REAL elite numbers, the /60 gaslighting scheme will be 100% abandoned. And it has. lol. (well, other than when he's off his game. It rears its ugly head sometimes when that happens).
4. If Matthews has a mediocre year offensively the narrative will immediately change to how "well" he's playing defense. Lol, and here we have it. Matthews is 18th in points and goals and only TWO players above him have a higher aav than him. He's underperforming his contract BIG TIME. And so look at this forum FLOODING the board with his defensive stats. Lol, so predictable.
Like I said, it was a prophetic post. And it all came true.
You can't really say Matthews is a combo of players and not include Ovechkin's goal-scoring ability.
He's like if Malkin, Datsyuk, and Ovechkin got smushed together.
Literally one of the rarest players we'll ever see.
You arnt wrong in the sense that Willy is no Mitch Marner defensively which has had a slight effect on the Matthews line this season but even so:
Since start of 2020 to the present:
Ranking of some of the top defensive centers in the NHL 5v5:
Shots Against/60:
1. Bergeron
2. Matthews
3. Danault
4. Kopitar
5. Barkov
6. O'Reilly
Scoring Chances Against/60:
1. Bergeron
2. Barkov
3. Matthews
4. Danault
5. Kopitar
6. O'Reilly
High Danger Scoring Chances Against/60:
1. Bergeron
2. Matthews
3. Barkov
4. O'Reilly
5. Danault
6. Kopitar
xGA/60:
1. Bergeron
2. Matthews
3. Barkov
4. Danault
5. Kopitar
6. O'Reilly
Takeaways/60:
1. Matthews
2. Barkov
3. O'Reilly
4. Bergeron
5. Kopitar
6. Danault
Blocked Shots/60:
1. Kopitar
2. Matthews
3. Danault
4. Barkov
5. Bergeron
6. O'Reilly
Bergeron is the defensive god we all think he is but not only is Matthews great defensively but he is far better than some of the guys people think are elite.
Barkov is the most interesting to me as Matthews has had better defensive stats than him pretty much his whole career including the year Barkov won the Selke.
I really do think the wildly uneven goaltending has really contributed to him not getting recognition as there are too many morons in the press that equate Goals Against = D. If you have a tire fire in net, no amount of great D is going to help. Its not rocket science.
The two most underrated defensive players in the league are Matthews and Erikisson EK IMO.