Of course.. context is key i believe is a favorite phrase to go to.Always be careful with data.
It's only meant to be used in conjunction with other tools, and should never be the whole picture when analyzing a player or a game.
In my world, more data is good.
It helps to expand the picture or clear up some fuzzy areas of detail.
What advanced stats can't do, is paint the whole picture.
so a player had 14 shots on goal, that's great.
Where were they from, what type or shot, was he alone or were there others around who had better shots available, etc.
That he had 14 shots is a statistic.
The context of those 14 shots is important.
Take Kyper with a mountain of salt.
I've always had him in the same category as Simmons, Cox, Feschuck, and even the older Toronto Sun columnists...out for attention and clicks/reads.
I'd be shocked if they didn't help author this to be honest.
I've heard that the teams have access to much much more detail than we do.
They have shift by shift data, not just big picture stuff.
If i share opinions on players and what i think of them i can only do thatbif i watch them - i could never in good faith read their data book and conclude
On the flip side i enjoy looking at some of these things mainly to see if my opinions are just.. i mean it is fascinating and i have to limit myself as i can go for hours on this type of thing.. i used to build my own reports in my old job because i didnt like the company's.. and used to build projection models because they didnt have them
I can go deep down.. i have to limit myself haha