The Apologist
Apologizing for Leaf garbage since 1979
Not all of us get to hang out with them after work like you I suppose.Publicly
Not all of us get to hang out with them after work like you I suppose.Publicly
I didn't say that I hung out with the players, nor did I claim to have ever spoken to a player.Not all of us get to hang out with them after work like you I suppose.
Look at the results my good man. There is more imagining. Poor little Mitchy took a face wash...oh my. AM was frightened. Not one ounce of leadership. Gutless.That's just a fancy way of saying you're judging on team success. The only personal success they're lacking thus far is team playoff success.
High character individuals are always targeted by teams, and especially so when the majority of your core is quite young, and when you're adding to a team mid-season. They also tend to be either some of the best players available at the deadline, or the players nearing the end of their career who are willing to take less to go to a destination in the offseason, who we'd want to target anyway. That doesn't equate to Matthews being a bad leader.
Lol. No they didn't. What are you even talking about.
Good lord. You imagining Matthews making some face and arbitrarily concluding the reasons for it based on nothing is not an argument. I'm not sure why anybody would think somebody would care about taking a faceoff, but the funniest part is that the number of faceoffs Matthews took pre and post deadline didn't even meaningfully change.
Look at the results my good man. There is more imagining. Poor little Mitchy took a face wash...oh my. AM was frightened. Not one ounce of leadership. Gutless.
If Keefe and Dubas thought AM was a leader, then why supplement the team and pay for O'REILLY. A third line or 4th line player will not give their body and soul to a team for leaders who do not show leadership. That is the TML team of 22/23
The difference being Mario (with a bad back) was 10x the player Matthews is when healthy. Mario fought cancer and returned the same season to mop the ice with the rest of the league, scoring at Gretzkys 215 point pace. Mario was also a playoff demigod whereas Matthews comes up small. I do agree that Matthews has some "Lemieux" in him where he would rather be left alone to perform -- remember Mario's "garage league" diatribe? But, when Mario got angry, he would put a team through the shredder by himself. When Matthews gets angry, Steven Stamkos ragdolls him around the ice like a sack of potatoes.I feel like Auston Matthews is a bit like Mario Lemieux. Kind of an unknowable, remote persona, gifted player who doesn’t like being jostled in the fray. Not a natural and easy leader but can lead by virtue of being the lead dog in terms of dominance. But he can also be very chameleon-like in his play style. Sometimes it’s power on power. Sometimes there’s a bite and fire to his game. Sometimes there isn’t. He’s defensively committed. But then he’s not to a catastrophic result. He’s physical and he’s not. It’s like he’s so gifted he can mime just about any play style. And he gets most into trouble the more he gets on that frequency with Mitch.
The results don't indicate that they are bad leaders.Look at the results my good man.
Because competitive teams like upgrading their team at the deadline, and O'Rielly was one of the best options out there.If Keefe and Dubas thought AM was a leader, then why supplement the team and pay for O'REILLY.
Not going to continue this debate, AM has shown to be a very good player, better in past years than the last year. He lost his push, played at slower pace, lost his incredible shot but did play more D.The results don't indicate that they are bad leaders.
Because competitive teams like upgrading their team at the deadline, and O'Rielly was one of the best options out there.
That's a club that no one wants to join.
You are just stating the obvious. I cannot fathom why everyone else cant. The results ( or lack there of) speak for themselves....Not going to continue this debate, AM has shown to be a very good player, better in past years than the last year. He lost his push, played at slower pace, lost his incredible shot but did play more D.
But his inability to be the leader, to be strong when required, to become the best man on his team not the best player means we will be waiting past 56 yrs.
Matthews has shown to be one of the best players in the entire cap era, and a good leader, and the only thing that happened last year was he played injured.AM has shown to be a very good player, better in past years than the last year. He lost his push, played at slower pace, lost his incredible shot but did play more D.
But his inability to be the leader, to be strong when required, to become the best man on his team not the best player means we will be waiting past 56 yrs.
Disagree 100%. He is not a leader period. Give examples of where he demonstrated that or willed a team to win like Messier did at will...like I said, wishful thinking. Now, by comparison, Mackinnon is a leader....as an exampleMatthews has shown to be one of the best players in the entire cap era, and a good leader, and the only thing that happened last year was he played injured.
The reason we're waiting past 56 years has nothing to do with his leadership.
People making claims that he's not a leader are not only bringing absolutely nothing to support that position, but are also contradicting everybody that would actually know.Disagree 100%. He is not a leader period. Give examples of where he demonstrated that or willed a team to win like Messier did at will...like I said, wishful thinking. Now, by comparison, Mackinnon is a leader....as an example
Now you have no idea if he was injured. You argued when I said the talking heads have not chased down what he has done if anything to help this yr. If he had serious injury one of those all talk reporters surely had some inside info. No info, no injury, no treatment, no excuse.Matthews has shown to be one of the best players in the entire cap era, and a good leader, and the only thing that happened last year was he played injured.
The reason we're waiting past 56 years has nothing to do with his leadership.
Talk is just that.... talk! His team mates can claim he is or will be one but he has to prove it on the ice where the game is played. This is a results orientated business. That's why he gets paid big bucks. He can be a great scorer, but that does not infer he's a great leader....that involves intangibles he does not have....or...has not developed yet, if that is even possible. I believe they are born with those qualities. These are just my opinions...People making claims that he's not a leader are not only bringing absolutely nothing to support that position, but are also contradicting everybody that would actually know.
"Auston has really transformed into a leader in this locker room,” Spezza said. “His daily habits have always been exceptional, but he’s having conversations with guys away from the group, he’s having conversations at the right time in the dressing room.
“He has pushed us at times to be better. He has a great mind for the game and we’re starting to see it now in the room.
“And he also knows when maybe it just wasn’t (going on a certain night) and you have to move on quickly. It’s good to have a fresh take on things sometimes and he’s been able to give that.”
Leafs coach Sheldon Keefe has taken note of the change in Matthews.
“We’ve seen him stepping up vocally, whether it’s talking to the team on the bench or in the dressing room, or pulling guys aside and communicating with them,” Keefe said. “Whether it’s encouragement or correction, or just strategizing, he’s taking a lot more initiative.
“We’ve talked about that evolution in his leadership, but he’s taken a lot of it on himself, knowing that’s a big part of being a great player, is to lead the way and make others better and set the standard and have a level of accountability."
There are multiple different ways to lead effectively, you don't see the majority of ways in which players lead, and winning the cup is about way, way more than the leadership of one individual.
Messier didn't will his teams to win. Mackinnon hasn't demonstrated any leadership qualities beyond Matthews. That's not why they won.
In fact, Mackinnon's leadership is the most questionable, considering the stories about him and how he treats his teammates.
He literally confirmed it himself.Now you have no idea if he was injured.
Their talk on Matthews' leadership means a heck of a lot more than your talk about Matthews' leadership, considering they would actually know and you wouldn't.Talk is just that.... talk!
This one is a bit of a conundrum.
Matthews full delivered on his $11.634 million cap hit in 2021-22 during his Hart, Rocket, Everything year, and I'd say emerging as that level of a player has certainly put him in line for being highest paid on the next deal, next in line to Mackinnon etc.
Where it kind of goes wonky on me is he had a very disappointing 2022-23 follow up season by his standards and once again did not really build on his playoff resume.
But why is Matthews' value impervious to down seasons, seemingly the only superstar pegged to the future cap increase, and the only guy not looking for full term security?
Don't get wrong, I'm still jumping at the chance to lock him up at $13.5 million or whatever has been reported. But when David Pastrnak has just surpassed Matthews single season best and only at $11.25 million on an 8 year deal months before Matthews negotiation?
We're definitely paying a Toronto only tax for a player whose value does not seem tied to any real precedent in the league.
I'm using talk in contrast to action. He has not acted nor demonstrated to be a leader. I don't want to go off forever & bandy words with you....if you dont get it - I dont want to try & convince you....He literally confirmed it himself.
Their talk on Matthews' leadership means a heck of a lot more than your talk about Matthews' leadership, considering they would actually know and you wouldn't.
So far, only one of them is on record as saying he wants to be a Maple Leaf.I would seriously offer Auston a very short contract just so he and McDavid become UFA in the same year.
Then we’ll see who wants to be a Maple Leaf more.
Yes he has, even if some don't want to acknowledge it due to team playoff results.He has not acted nor demonstrated to be a leader.
You're correct.I'm using talk in contrast to action. He has not acted nor demonstrated to be a leader. I don't want to go off forever & bandy words with you....if you dont get it - I dont want to try & convince you....
So far, only one of them is on record as saying he wants to be a Maple Leaf.