I wonder how Kyper would possibly know this. Why would Matthews side leak such specific information? This reminds me of Dreger and his Marner reporting. Although some of it might ring true in the end, I am thinking he is drawing it out of his ass.
Hopefully Treliving isn't that stupid.I guess we'll see.
Yup - Dubas banked on the Cap going up.
This is the only guy who gets excuses made for him
Having a rough stretch? Wrist injury
No show in the playoffs? Wrist injury
Got paid significantly more than comparables? But…but he score goals
We don’t talk about other superstars like this. Mackinnon and pastrnak weren’t talked about getting 13-14. Why the hell should he, when he’s been overpaid on the current contract on the entirety of it
This next contract is idiotic. He shouldn’t get anything more than 13x8. If it’s shorter term than less AAV, why are we trying to revolutionize resigning a player. We did it with RFAs and paying them off potential and it ruined us. If a player takes less years, he should not get as much AAV. On a 3-4 year deal i wouldn’t pay him a dollar over 12.
It's not even the money that is the problem as much as it is him not realizing he is just making the team weaker by asking for 14-15M. That's the part that irks me...if he asks for something stupid like that after having low priced guys like Bunting playing on his wing for the last couple of years...I don't know what to say.I offer him 13.5 x 8. You are the highest paid player in the league by a significant gap, you get security, you get 130+ million career earnings and the potential for another contract still, but you also give the team a chance to win with that number.
If we are into 14-15M, trade him. That simple.
"Dubasites" keep using the excuse about the cap being stagnant...but that wasn't as big an issue as paying 3 guys over $10M. We also had bargain bin players that we got for a lot less than we would have if the cap kept going up. It's the PERCENTAGE of the cap that we allocated to 4 similar players...all on offence that did us in. Do you think you are getting Kampf for 1.5M if the cap was going up steadily? or Bunting for 900k? Not a chance...so even if the cap went up..Dubas would have still faced a similar if not exact problem.I guess we'll see.
Yup - Dubas banked on the Cap going up.
Perhaps they learned from a GM who staged his own power play and last minute changes to contracts. One who is currently trying to build his own hierarchy now in Pittsburgh.Oy...
How did all the Leaf players end up being so selfish? Isn't there one who's willing to set an example?
Ovi had a 65 goal, 112 pt season. Its pretty comparable to Matthews paces last year
It's crazy that a player who hasn't ever been close to winning an individual award only became the highest paid player in the league at a time the cap has been flat (albeit artificially) for the last 3 years?It's crazy to me how a guy like Mackinnon who just won his cup and was underpaid for years was happy with a 12.6 x 8. He needed to push the needle past McDavid but didn't go for a crazy amount like 13+ when he had all the reasons to
Now we're likely sitting here about to open the chequebook on ~13 for a MEDIUM term deal with AM34
Money is important, the no trade clause is MOST importantIf Matthews wants anything over 13 million you need to decide if you want to keep him.
And if you do, you should be trading Marner the next day and locking up Nylander to under 10 million.
There are your two higher paid forwards (now divert funds to D) and once Tavares is finished, you can fill out more.
Not a Selke Candidate, notably more physical and top 10 in hits, while nabbing Hart, Rocket and Lindsay (at that time). Pretty decentWas he also top 10 in Selke voting while winning the Hart, Pearson, Rocket?
Leading the league in various defensive metrics....
He was a damn good bit more physical, that's for sure.
Good..it'll kickstart trade talks (hopefully)...And???
There is no guarantee the NHL will get a better deal with Canadian TV. There is no guarantee the cap will go up. If it doesn't, 8x$14M+ will kill this team.
That's fair but do you really think Marner (and his dad) will agree? It will get ugly fast.
Mackinnon finished runner up for MVP twice and has been a finalist 3 times....saying he was never close is just wrong, especially when one of those years the winner was particularly scrutinized (Hall MVP). He's consistently been a top 5 player in hockey since 17-18Was he also top 10 in Selke voting while winning the Hart, Pearson, Rocket?
Leading the league in various defensive metrics....
He was a damn good bit more physical, that's for sure.
It's crazy that a player who hasn't ever been close to winning an individual award only became the highest paid player in the league at a time the cap has been flat (albeit artificially) for the last 3 years?
It's not that crazy.
ovie had four 50+ goals 100+ pt seasons in his first 5 yrs....sooo....Ovechkin never put up a season as good as Matthews did last year. Ovi's physical game is traded off for Matthews defensive game.
So that leaves us with what exactly?
A dependent and a fader. Matthews stops scoring when it gets rough and Marner becomes pedestrian. So what is the solution? Trade the goal scoring C so that the winger can get a more hard nosed group around him?
May as well blow it all up then if I am reading this situation right, and I think I am. Trade them both maybe keep Nylander for his McDavid like speed,
When you get paid like a top 10 player in the league you should drive your line no matter who you play with.With the right guys around him, he's a much different player.
Did you watch his memorial cup run with the Knights. He led his team, I mean truly led them, he scored something like 3 points a game throughout the playoffs. He was surrounded with the right players, players that didn't give up on pucks, took hits to make plays
When Matthews slumps they always put Mitch on his wing to get him going again, it always works and that's fine in the regular season.
In the playoffs though when Matthews does the disappearing act because of the tough going, sure Mitchs' points are going to disappear too.
I didn't see any of that 200 foot Matthews against Florida. What are you supposed to do when the main cog on your line isn't functioning, isn't participating. What happens is you end up being outmanned two or three to one in the Ozone. There aren't many guys that have ever played in the NHL that can beat those odds.
Was he also top 10 in Selke voting while winning the Hart, Pearson, Rocket?
Leading the league in various defensive metrics....
He was a damn good bit more physical, that's for sure.
It's crazy that a player who hasn't ever been close to winning an individual award only became the highest paid player in the league at a time the cap has been flat (albeit artificially) for the last 3 years?
It's not that crazy.
I know there's a lot of negatives around here about Doug MacLean, but he was very clear that Matthews isn't the kind of guy who can lead a team, and also sees him as at the top of his pay scale. He knows hes a great guy to have on your team, as he can really put the puck into the net, but he just isn't a playoff performer and has never been one. So you shouldn't be paying him as the focus player.
I've said this right from the start pretty much, at least after the glow of the 4 goal game had worn off. It was an incredible feat for a rookie, but there seemed to be a kind of lack of intensity to his play.
It may seem dumb, but how many hat tricks have slipped away from him. If he gets two goals early and the Leafs have a lead, he kind of goes into low idle, almost like "great I've done my job, now I can coast"
If Matthews doesn't want to sign for 7 or 8 at a price point that's reasonable for what he has normally and statistically delivered, so considering on cap forecasts I'd say 12 to 12.5 for 6 years and 13 for a 7 to 8 year deal.
There has to be money left for a solid supporting cast
WAT?
Bro has been runner up on the Hart a few times
He carried his team to a cup at 26
He put up 111 points in 71 games this year
MacK is undoubtedly a top 5 player in the league, are you ok?
Unfortunately, that's true. I'm just amazed that Matthrews and Marner are as greedy as they are. Even if one set an example, it might make a difference.Perhaps they learned from a GM who staged his own power play and last minute changes to contracts. One who is currently trying to build his own hierarchy now in Pittsburgh.
Learning from guys like Marleau and Thornton who took short term paydays and never won anything. Or a Tavares who made a fanbase believe he was committed with one foot out the door.
It’s not about team here, it’s about what you can get.