Auston Matthew 50 in 50 watch (37 in 42 so far)

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,425
16,829
My prediction at start of year wasn't necessarily 50 in 50, but rather 70+ goals overall. He likely falls short of 50 in 50, even though he's putting a hell of a run towards it - but 70 goals seems very real. Would be insane.
 

Goose

Registered User
Apr 18, 2006
3,284
3,150
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.
 

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,541
1,865
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.
Don’t disagree, but if he keeps playing and doesn’t produce much year after year he’ll no longer be looked at that way….but yeah, he’s tracking as an all time great goal scorer right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeE eL DuBoiS

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,527
6,254
Visit site
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.

10th in Playoff GPG doesn't help his case.

 

DamonDRW

Registered User
Dec 23, 2007
3,164
1,776
Tampere, Finland
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.
Contrarily to Bossy, Bure, Ovie, and other great goal scorers he also has an excellent skill of dissappearing in the playoffs.

Give me Claude Lemeaux and keep your Matthews.
 

The90

Registered User
Feb 27, 2017
6,143
4,926
That's worth emphasizing. A lot of people have dismissed Gretzky's best goal-scoring years because the league was much higher scoring than today. True, there were more goals per game - but nobody was even close:

View attachment 803043

Gretzky was 67% ahead of the next closest player (Mike Bossy - who was at/near his peak, and universally considered a top ten goal-scorer in NHL history). Granted, there were some weaker players in the top ten, but Gretzky nearly doubled the output of Hall of Famers like Messier, Dionne and Ciccarelli - and he did this while being 1st by far in assists.
Gretzkys records are further ahead than any other sports all time great. There was a great DVD that came out in the mid 2000’s that was called Ultimate Gretzky, went into detail about how far ahead he was to his next closest competitor.

That being said, where would Mario have been with full health?

 

Attachments

  • D2074763-680E-4056-B3E7-887880BD20FE.jpeg
    D2074763-680E-4056-B3E7-887880BD20FE.jpeg
    109.5 KB · Views: 3

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,921
1,929
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.
How does that really blow you away? He is pacing but still really early, if he is pacing this way after 500-600 goals the talks will heat up, but there’s nothing but speculation to suggest he’s going to separate himself from the likes of Stamkos, Iginla, Sakic, etc because it’s just too early to tell

Tbh he doesn’t rely on speed so I can see him compiling similar to Selanne but he simply doesn’t have the shot for me to really see him among the goal scoring GOATs like OV, Mario, Hull, etc. and if I’m being honest, we probably have already seen enough from him to say that even if he passed Bobby or Mario in the leaderboard he would never be considered better than those guys.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: authentic

WingsFan95

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
3,512
274
Kanata
Gretzkys records are further ahead than any other sports all time great. There was a great DVD that came out in the mid 2000’s that was called Ultimate Gretzky, went into detail about how far ahead he was to his next closest competitor.

That being said, where would Mario have been with full health?
Wilt Chamberlain should really ring a bell if we're looking at obliterating colleagues in league development years. And I know the NHL dated back long before NBA but the truth of the matter is six teams is six teams. Don Hutson in the NFL early days, Jim Brown in their modern era, etc.

The greats are greats for a reason. You can play it both ways with Gretzky. Hockey requiring more further equipment and additional skillset while paying less? That can create a storm of its own and I think Lemieux's accomplishments showcase at least one other legitimate peer meaning Gretzky wasn't a complete outlier by himself, just in career numbers, but then look at Tom Brady in the NFL who very much like Gretzky has arguably unreachable numbers and what's more is one of those is Championships while in Gretzky's era he captured less titles (yes it's unfair but point remains).
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,620
How does that really blow you away? He is pacing but still really early, if he is pacing this way after 500-600 goals the talks will heat up, but there’s nothing but speculation to suggest he’s going to separate himself from the likes of Stamkos, Iginla, Sakic, etc because it’s just too early to tell

Tbh he doesn’t rely on speed so I can see him compiling similar to Selanne but he simply doesn’t have the shot for me to really see him among the goal scoring GOATs like OV, Mario, Hull, etc. and if I’m being honest, we probably have already seen enough from him to say that even if he passed Bobby or Mario in the leaderboard he would never be considered better than those guys.
Through 8 seasons, Sakic had 51 fewer goals than Matthews has now. Iginla had 86 fewer. Stamkos was much closer at just 24 back, but it'll likely be somewhere around 50 back since Matthews still has the rest of the season to go.

You can question whether he'll maintain the separation between them, but there's no question he's already separated himself to this point in their careers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic and banks

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,572
19,991
Las Vegas
Through 8 seasons, Sakic had 51 fewer goals than Matthews has now. Iginla had 86 fewer. Stamkos was much closer at just 24 back, but it'll likely be somewhere around 50 back since Matthews still has the rest of the season to go.

You can question whether he'll maintain the separation between them, but there's no question he's already separated himself to this point in their careers.

3 guys that played in some of the lowest scoring eras in league history. Matthews plays in the high flying 80s compared to the late 90s/00s
 

WingsFan95

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
3,512
274
Kanata
Through 8 seasons, Sakic had 51 fewer goals than Matthews has now. Iginla had 86 fewer. Stamkos was much closer at just 24 back, but it'll likely be somewhere around 50 back since Matthews still has the rest of the season to go.

You can question whether he'll maintain the separation between them, but there's no question he's already separated himself to this point in their careers.
Selanne was a .645 after his 3rd Rocket (7th season)
Bure was .645 after his 3rd Rocket (10th season)
Yzerman was .587 after his 10th season never leading the league (way more games as he missed little time)
 

Busher

Registered User
May 17, 2021
208
227
Selanne was a .645 after his 3rd Rocket (7th season)
Bure was .645 after his 3rd Rocket (10th season)
Yzerman was .587 after his 10th season never leading the league (way more games as he missed little time)

Selanne, Bure and Yzerman are Matthews’ goal scoring comparables.

Those other three (Sakic, Iginla and Stamkos) are not. Matthews has already proven to be a higher caliber goal scorer.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,425
16,829
What blows me away is that there are still people on the site who disagree that he’s on pace to be one of the greatest goal scorers of all time.

Even if he retired today, with only 500 games played or whatever, he’d still be remembered and talked about, probably similar to how people remember Bure as one of the great goal scorers even though he only played 700ish games and never scored 500 goals.
Who disagrees? And also - it depends what you mean by one of the greatest goal-scorers of all-time. Do you mean top ~10-15? Or top ~3-5?

Short of any huge career injury or falling off a cliff dramatically, to me he's going to finish ~10th all-time minimum. But also - anything above 10 is far from guarantee. That's where you get into the Brett Hull or Mike Bossy or some of those guys territory...and that's without even talking of guys like Bobby Hull, Gretzky, Lemieux or Ovechkin.

So ~10th all-time he's on target for.
Top 5? Nope. Maybe if he ages like Ovechkin, but seems unlikely.
Top ~6-9? Maybe. but we'll see.
 

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,921
1,929
Through 8 seasons, Sakic had 51 fewer goals than Matthews has now. Iginla had 86 fewer. Stamkos was much closer at just 24 back, but it'll likely be somewhere around 50 back since Matthews still has the rest of the season to go.

You can question whether he'll maintain the separation between them, but there's no question he's already separated himself to this point in their careers.
So are you just talking about statistically, and his ability to pass them on the leaderboard?

Matthews will likely pass Bobby and Mario, but it’s pretty evident he isn’t on their level in goal scoring.
 

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,921
1,929
Selanne, Bure and Yzerman are Matthews’ goal scoring comparables.

Those other three (Sakic, Iginla and Stamkos) are not. Matthews has already proven to be a higher caliber goal scorer.
Going to disagree as pre-leg injury Stammer was just as good as Matthews. Let’s hope Matthews doesn’t have something big happen to him, and hope his wrist problems are behind him.
 

kevsh

Registered User
Nov 28, 2018
3,647
5,109
50/50 is still very doubtful but what he's doing so far is still incredibly impressive. Looking past that I'm watching to see if he breaks 60 again.

The Leafs have 39 games left for AM to score 23 goals for 60, which means that unless he misses a significant # of games (at least 5+), he's probably getting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,257
6,620
3 guys that played in some of the lowest scoring eras in league history. Matthews plays in the high flying 80s compared to the late 90s/00s
League GAA during their first 8 years
Stamkos 2.58
Iginla 2.59
Matthews 2.82
Sakic 3.31

Sakic's first 8 were '88-'89 to '95-96. Fair on Iginla and Stamkos, since they definitely started off in a lower scoring era, but Matthews era is closer to theirs than it is to Sakic's.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $613.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $185.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 7
    Staked: $52,190.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $185.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad