Whitesnake
If you rebuild, they will come.
- Jan 5, 2003
- 91,405
- 41,061
It's inevitable that after trades, some players improve, some stay the same, some worsen, and it's probably unfeasible for the team to maximize the trade value of every player. That's a heavy burden on the coach, who also needs to either win games and/or develop young players.
Point is...with what Bergevin was given. And what he also got. There is NO reasons that we didn't win a Cup during his tenure. And be a competive team for way more than we were.
Aren't you all tired of the constant ''he wouldn't have been that great here'' comment we keep making? Doesn't it say everything that needs to be said?
I get where you’re coming from, but you’re looking at it through the wrong lense.
It’s a great trade. Exactly the kind that you and I have advocated us to make for years. And it’s exactly the kind of trade I hope we make again in the near future.
And again, I guess it's semantics..but to me thinking we made a fair trade does NOT equal to already calling a move a WIN-WIN. Call it semantics. I'm just saying, I see the difference. That's just me I guess.
To me a win comes with proven results. Nobody would have called a win for the Avs if they are already out and Lehky missed 20 open nets.
Yes, I've advocating for flushing out our waste. To get picks and rookies. In their respective draft year, I was high on Heineman. I didn't have an opinion on Smilanic though later on, I acquired him for in my simulated hockey league. And wasn't that much of a fan in Barron. Nowadays, I do have a higher opinion on Barron. But I can't say that of all the 3 guys we acquired, that I was ecstatic with 1 of them. But we got 2 1st rounders. 1 of which we know is low. 1 of which we should still think it will be low. But at least we didn't waste those guys. For sure. And I still hope that we will find a way to really unload our REAL waste like Armia, Byron and Cie. But that would take a miracle. Thanks a lot, again, to the past management.
Last edited: