Player Discussion Artem Zub (D) Part 2 [Extended 4 years @ $4.6M]

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
His injury this year was a broken foot from blocking a shot. One of his injuries last year was
a broken jaw from a puck to face.
Do you think those mean he's injury prone?
I don't.
You missed this years concussion from your list, and the other previous ones.

It’s the numerous concussions that are the concern, with each one taking a longer recovery. It’s not the broken foot that is concerning.
 
He looked much better against the Wings.

It would be a significant positive change if he gets back to form and we can roll out 2 legit top 4 pairings.

Also nice to see the D activating more, we need more goals from the back end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy and armani
Playing like the Zub of old. Can he play healthy enough and long enough? I am sgill not sold on him long term, and find that him being injury prone can lead him to being a trading chip
 
people who wanna trade this guy be crazy.
I don't actively want to move him, but he does have a concerning injury history. If there's a deal that lets us acquire a top 3 RD from a rebuilding team with Zub going the other way, Staios has to consider it (Rasmus Andersson type guy). I hope he stays in Ottawa long term as a healthy regular shutdown RD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darude and coladin
I love Zub, but he's like Christopher Tanev. Vital when he plays, but you're holding ur breath a bit when he's out there.

If we can flip him for a Rasmus Andersson or a more healthier version, it's a no brainer. Otherwise, foolish to trade him, even with injuries as he only makes 4.5 million.

Guys like Brodin/Zub/Tanev... excellent defensive and play with their hearts, will miss about 15-20 games more often than not.
 

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad