Kershaw
Guest
Re-read what I wrote. It's not just about TOI on the PK, it's also about the situations in which he's used. I'd argue that Callahan's 20+ TOI is actually a detriment to his game. He's always out there in the worst situations where he's needed for his defense. Pascal is a good penalty killer, no doubt. So is Callahan.
Exactly! That is my point!
Callahan is not good enough of a player to be leading a NHL team in TOI/PG. Your team is very flawed if that's what it comes down to! Callahan would play a role similar to Dupuis on the Penguins.
NYR's PP has been woeful going on 3 years for whatever reason. And, honestly, I think Staal and Sullivan are roughly comparable to Dubinsky and Richards. That's not a slam dunk in the Rangers favor by any stretch. Dubinsky had a **** year last year and scored a whopping two goals this year. Jordan Staal is #2 C on most teams in this league.
lol. Brad Richards and Brandon Dubinsky are way better players than Jordan Staal and Steve Sullivan. Let's not get silly here. Callahan's had better linemates.
4 minutes per game with Crosby is 4 more than Callahan had. And how about this year?
I'm not sure where you got the 4 mins from. But yes, Dupuis has played with Crosby a lot this year and is producing like a 1st liner. While bringing in all those intangibles.
Your analysis didn't resemble "very comparable". I think you were trying to make it clear that Dupuis > Callahan, not that Dupuis = Callahan.
I think Dupuis is a vastly superior ES player and PK player. So yeah, imo Dupuis > Callahan. Dupuis has never got a shot on the PP, but Callahan is pretty good at it.
Wind the clock back to Dupuis @ 28 and Ryan Callahan @ 28 and their careers aren't even in the same ballpark. 76 goals for Dupuis, 105 for Callahan. 76 assists for Dupuis. 93 for Callahan.
Can't do this because players progress at far different rates. Compare Drury at 27 with Martin St. Louis at 27 and you'd think Drury is the much better player for the future.
A lot of this has to do with the relative strengths of the teams they play for, too. Pittsburgh is obviously a loaded team with a roster that decimates most NHL rosters by a mile. Having success with a team like that (that's been consistently at the top of the league for years) isn't isolated to players like Pascal Dupuis.
A perfect guy to use is Ruslan Fedotenko. Look at his production with the Pens and then with the Rangers in roughly the same amount of games. Pens production is roughly 25% greater. How about Jordan Staal, who went from the third line in Pittsburgh to 1st/2nd in Carolina and saw his production decrease?
Ask yourself if Dupuis was a Ranger would he have similar production? I don't think so.
It's not all about production, it's how effective the player is when he's on the ice. To me, it's more than point and goal totals. I prefer Dupuis since he is a significantly better player at ES and SH, thus I prefer him. Just my opinion.