Yeah, I think it takes a real proactive approach to rebuilding, man. You gotta be willing to just rip the band-aid off, accept that shit's gonna suck for a good number of years, and hope you hit some draft scores through exceptional scouting and a colossal amount of luck.
I'm dreading the possibility that this team goes out and signs somebody like Larkin for huge dollars to try and remain pseudo-competitive once the era's finally over. That sorta half-assed, cut corners bullshit just makes rebuilds even longer.
A team like the Rangers lucked into a top-3, maybe top-2 blueliner in Fox, Panarin wanted to live in NYC, they hit big on the Brassard-Zibanejad thing, lucked into two top-2 picks and they're still pretty mediocre unless Shesterkin's gulping down some of Ovechkin's horse steroids.
Yeah, no, I agree. My point is that by and large, that's just NHL coaches--with very few exceptions. It's pretty rare to have a guy be as open and willing to work with youth and accentuate a roster's strengths when the alternative is so much easier and, because this league sucks, safe as far as success goes. Nobody loves their no-name loser 4th line vets and bottom pairing d-men who slop the game up and make for an awful product like the NHL and its execs/coaches.
This f***ing organization, man.
Hell, the city's cursed when it comes to coaches, I hear. But f*** the Steelers, I don't know shit about that team or Tomlin.